#1  
Old 09-05-2009, 09:46 AM
Shnoz's Avatar
Shnoz (Sophie)
Shnoz

Shnoz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lismore, Australia
Posts: 59
Choosing a Camera

Hi, I was thinking of getting into astrophotography after just observing for a few years. But I don't know too much about cameras.
I've heard that DSLR's and CCD's are good for astrophotography, but are there any specific cameras anyone would recommend?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-05-2009, 10:45 AM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Sophie, why not start with something like a lower end DSLR?

Say, maybe a Canon 1000D? Or, maybe a 2nd hand 350D. You can shoot with them as is, or pay a few hundred dollars to get them modded - which will make them far more sensitive to Red areas of the spectrum.

Dedicated CCD cameras maybe down the track, I'd really recommend from everything I've read and seen to start off with a DSLR first before investing too heavily.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-05-2009, 04:23 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
What is your budget?

The easiest is really to start with a DSLR like Canon 350D, 400D, 450D, 100D. (pick your budget)

Start with wide field shots using a standard camera lens.

Depending on your budget you may have other options available like dedicated astronomy CCD cameras.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-05-2009, 04:59 PM
toryglen-boy's Avatar
toryglen-boy (Duncan)
Scotland to Australia

toryglen-boy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
Sophie, why not start with something like a lower end DSLR?

Say, maybe a Canon 1000D? Or, maybe a 2nd hand 350D. You can shoot with them as is, or pay a few hundred dollars to get them modded - which will make them far more sensitive to Red areas of the spectrum.

Dedicated CCD cameras maybe down the track, I'd really recommend from everything I've read and seen to start off with a DSLR first before investing too heavily.

Dave

excellent post.

I had this choice last week, and bought a Canon 1000D twin lens kit and havent looked back, mine was $870 from Dick Smiths, in truth its not as good as the 450D, and it feels a little cheaper, and its lighter because of it (450g) but its an excellent place to start off

Duncan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-05-2009, 05:13 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Light is probably good Duncan - less stress on the focuser and less flexure.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-05-2009, 11:43 AM
Shnoz's Avatar
Shnoz (Sophie)
Shnoz

Shnoz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lismore, Australia
Posts: 59
Thanks for you recommendations!
I was thinking about a Canon 1000D, it seems the best balance I can so far find between quality and money. I'm still looking around, but now I have somewhere to go from!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-05-2009, 12:46 PM
toryglen-boy's Avatar
toryglen-boy (Duncan)
Scotland to Australia

toryglen-boy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shnoz View Post
Thanks for you recommendations!
I was thinking about a Canon 1000D, it seems the best balance I can so far find between quality and money. I'm still looking around, but now I have somewhere to go from!

Dick Smiths do the twin lens kit, for $870 ish

cant go wrong !!

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-05-2009, 08:31 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
That's a pretty good price for what you get.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-05-2009, 08:10 PM
pirate of skies's Avatar
pirate of skies (Rob)
Registered User

pirate of skies is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Loganholme,Brisbane
Posts: 47
I saw online at
http://www.aoe.com.au/ccdphotography.html

A bottom end CCD (CMOS) usb camera with shot button.
I dont understand why it says CCD, then says cmos. I though these were two diff animals...

specs,

CCD USB Camera with shot button
Sensor: Ultra-sensitive 1/3"CMOS
Video Format: 24-bit
Shutter: Electronic controlled
Resolution: 640x480 Pixels: 300,000
Frame Rate: 30fps(CIF), 15fgs (VGA)
Minimum Illumination: 3 lux
S/N Ratio: Equals to 48dB or above
Aperture: 1.25" Power: USB (5V)
Operating Environment: 0-40ºC


I am new to this game, so maybe something I am missing.

Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (SaxCCD.jpg)
9.3 KB13 views

Last edited by pirate of skies; 26-05-2009 at 08:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-05-2009, 08:40 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate of skies View Post
I saw online at
http://www.aoe.com.au/ccdphotography.html

A bottom end CCD (CMOS) usb camera with shot button.
I dont understand why it says CCD, then says cmos. I though these were two diff animals...

specs,

CCD USB Camera with shot button
Sensor: Ultra-sensitive 1/3"CMOS
Video Format: 24-bit
Shutter: Electronic controlled
Resolution: 640x480 Pixels: 300,000
Frame Rate: 30fps(CIF), 15fgs (VGA)
Minimum Illumination: 3 lux
S/N Ratio: Equals to 48dB or above
Aperture: 1.25" Power: USB (5V)
Operating Environment: 0-40ºC


I am new to this game, so maybe something I am missing.

You're correct: CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) and CCD (Charge-coupled devices) are not the same.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-05-2009, 12:14 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Typically CMOS consumes less power and has a better S/N ratio than CCD technology.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-05-2009, 02:36 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
Typically CMOS consumes less power and has a better S/N ratio than CCD technology.

Dave
I don't agree about the better S/N ratio. Have a look at these sites
http://gadgetophilia.com/a-guide-to-...or-technology/

http://www.dalsa.com/corp/markets/CCD_vs_CMOS.aspx

http://www.photo.net.ph/blogalicious...gital-cameras/

Certainly the gap is closing and you'll know that CMOS has overtaken CCD when SBIG puts out a camera with a CMOS chip
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27-05-2009, 03:37 PM
NeilW
Registered User

NeilW is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 296
What would be the best option if I wanted to use a device just to "look" through a scope via a computer, rather than capture images? My eyesight isn't what it used to be, and I was wondering if I could use a CCD or similar rather than looking through an eyepiece.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27-05-2009, 06:40 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghsmith45 View Post
I don't agree about the better S/N ratio. Have a look at these sites
http://gadgetophilia.com/a-guide-to-...or-technology/

http://www.dalsa.com/corp/markets/CCD_vs_CMOS.aspx

http://www.photo.net.ph/blogalicious...gital-cameras/

Certainly the gap is closing and you'll know that CMOS has overtaken CCD when SBIG puts out a camera with a CMOS chip
I was talking from a DSLR point of view - Canon has used CMOS technology for many years now and it has kicked all of the competitors butts quite badly that stuck with CCD. Ambient temperatures. Having used both (original EOS1D was CCD), I can say CMOS is far better in every area.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-05-2009, 10:15 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Sophie,

Would you also use the camera for terrestrial daytime photography?

If it is purely for astrophotography, I would heavily recommend a modified Canon EOS-350D or, if you can stretch the budget, a modified EOS-40D.

The 350D is tried and tested and produces magnificent results. The 40D has the added advantage of LiveView, which will allow you to focus very quickly and easily by chimping on the LCD preview screen. It also has a 14-bit sensor which captures more dynamic range, and is also built a lot sturdier than the older 350D.

If you're intending to use the camera for both terrestrial and astrophotographic purposes, and, if you're an absolute beginner, then, you might want to try the new Canon EOS-500D.

Having said that, you can still use a modified camera (modification involves removing the stock infra-red/ultraviolet block filter and replacing it with a third party filter which allows the hydrogen alpha wavelength of light to pass through to the sensor -- this is the portion of the spectrum that contains all that beautiful red diffuse/emission nebulosity) -- you just need to set your white balance either through a custom setting in the camera (instructions are in the manual) or manually when you post-process your images by using the white balance tool in your chosen software, and clicking on a portion of the image which you think should be white.

I hope this helps. If you have questions, feel free to ask.

Regards,
Humayun
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement