Quote:
Originally Posted by Quopaz
Thanks, Anth I took plenty of Mars pics with the 60D (unmodified), it's just that when I changed to the 462 I noticed a massive improvement in detail over what I was able to get with the Canon. The brightness I could handle by turning down the ISO to 200 with shutter speed on 60. I think maybe the frames per second has a lot to do with it. The Canon topped out at 60fps and the 462mc is getting around 250fps.
|
Thanks Nick, that makes sense. I've found the same with the guide cam I'm using - heaps more detail and the canon is a little top heavy for planetary too.