ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Gibbous 74.8%
|
|
17-03-2019, 04:03 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
|
|
Did I buy the right camera ZWOi178MC ?
Looking for advice ,very new to all that is Modern Astronomy.
I just want to start with Planets and some deep sky stuff. May be get a small refractor down the track.
After a lot of looking and some research the ZWOi178MC at 6 megapixels seems a good fit for my Meade 6"ACF 1540mm Focal Length, originally looked the at the 120MC and MM and then the 224MC.
Someone tell me I did the right thing. I would have started with a DSLR but don't have one.
Thanks for any input,
Cliff
|
17-03-2019, 04:14 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 889
|
|
For planets, yes. It should do well. For deep sky, absolutely not. The tiny pixel size will result in massive oversampling, tiny sensor at f/8 will be very limiting and to top it off, uncooled
Imo if you can, get a refund and buy a cheap DSLR, which will perform MUCH better than the 178. Again, if you are only interested in planets it should work great
|
17-03-2019, 08:11 PM
|
|
Drifting from the pole
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
|
|
Indeed, the 178 has very good QE, so should work well for planets and don’t forget Lunar
The larger chip (than the 120 or 224) will get you more in the FOV.
|
17-03-2019, 08:14 PM
|
Feel free to edit my imag
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Llandysul, WALES, UK
Posts: 1,381
|
|
Too late now anyway it is a good camera I have one, but for The Moon it will be great
|
17-03-2019, 10:29 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
|
|
Thanks Jeremy I guess the Moon will be my first target anyway. Maybe the Sun also .
|
17-03-2019, 10:32 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
|
|
Thanks Dunk,
Yes I looked at the sensor size and FOV handy calculators online. Also the Sony back illuminated Sensor. Have to start somewhere.
|
17-03-2019, 10:35 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
|
|
Thanks Logan, probably start out with Planets anyway. Maybe i'll still look for a cheap DSLR.
|
17-03-2019, 10:53 PM
|
|
Local Korean Millennial
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charleville
Posts: 2,063
|
|
im sure you know this, but always worth mentioning NOT to look at the sun without a front aperture filter! especially with the 6" SCT
|
18-03-2019, 08:09 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
|
|
Yep quite aware Tony, the Scope came with the proper Front filter. Used to image the Sun on an a Tasco years ago on a piece of Card but of cause refractors are a different thing.
|
18-03-2019, 10:17 AM
|
|
Not even a speck of dust
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
|
|
Yes the 178 can do deep sky stuff. Its not ideal camera for anything, but superb for solar system and able to do long exposure stuff as well. Not useless. Its why I got mine and dont regret it. Solar system (planets, moon, sun) imaging require ultra fast frame rates while deep sky(galaxy,nebulae)and comets require longer exposure and usually lots of pixels too. All zwo cameras can be broken up into those two camps. The can all do both to varying degrees, some are great at one and poor at the other, the 178 is a good compromise camera of both. not ideal at either but strong for solar system but not useless at wider field.
|
18-03-2019, 07:01 PM
|
|
kids+wife+scopes=happyman
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 4,979
|
|
Cliff,
Use it and learn with it. You got it for a reason, and now is not the time to begin double guessing yourself and doubting the camera, your gear or yourself.
Get a larger sensor camera will cost you a packet more, and you will still have the same mountain to climb educating yourself. You've done your money now, so use this capable camera to learn. When you are ready for the next step, that larger sensor camera will be cheaper or superseded by a much better camera.
Enjoy this camera. Learn to use focal reducers with it and shorter focal length scopes to get a wider image scale. The sensor size isn't everything. Give the camera a go, it will surprise you.
Alex.
|
19-03-2019, 09:50 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
|
|
Thanks Steve,
I did research it and seemed the best compromise as you say, I guess I was attracted by the modern Sony back illuminated sensor and 6 Megapixels. I have a more technical background than Astronomer.
cheers
Cliff
|
19-03-2019, 09:50 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
|
|
Thanks Alex,
Got your PM wont add more here
|
19-03-2019, 11:03 AM
|
|
Drifting from the pole
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff
I did research it and seemed the best compromise as you say, I guess I was attracted by the modern Sony back illuminated sensor and 6 Megapixels. I have a more technical background than Astronomer.
|
Cliff, the 178 is a good sensor...I use an ASI178MM-Cool for Deep Sky
One of the bonus features of the 178 compared to many others is the 14-bit ADC...so if you get a night of pretty stable seeing, you can dial the gain all the way down to zero and get the full dynamic range that the camera is capable of...on the Moon and the brighter planets (Venus, Mars, Jupiter) it should be a winner! (just remember to use 16-bit output in your capture program)
|
19-03-2019, 11:59 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
|
|
Hi Dunk,
Yes I noticed the 14bit ADC.
Later I could add my own Peltier cooling I guess. Just starting out.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Rate This Thread |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:59 PM.
|
|