Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-03-2019, 04:03 PM
Cliff (Clifford)
Registered User

Cliff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
Did I buy the right camera ZWOi178MC ?

Looking for advice ,very new to all that is Modern Astronomy.

I just want to start with Planets and some deep sky stuff. May be get a small refractor down the track.

After a lot of looking and some research the ZWOi178MC at 6 megapixels seems a good fit for my Meade 6"ACF 1540mm Focal Length, originally looked the at the 120MC and MM and then the 224MC.

Someone tell me I did the right thing. I would have started with a DSLR but don't have one.

Thanks for any input,
Cliff
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-03-2019, 04:14 PM
Lognic04's Avatar
Lognic04 (Logan)
Registered User

Lognic04 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 889
For planets, yes. It should do well. For deep sky, absolutely not. The tiny pixel size will result in massive oversampling, tiny sensor at f/8 will be very limiting and to top it off, uncooled
Imo if you can, get a refund and buy a cheap DSLR, which will perform MUCH better than the 178. Again, if you are only interested in planets it should work great
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-03-2019, 08:11 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
Indeed, the 178 has very good QE, so should work well for planets and don’t forget Lunar

The larger chip (than the 120 or 224) will get you more in the FOV.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-03-2019, 08:14 PM
Ukastronomer (Jeremy)
Feel free to edit my imag

Ukastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Llandysul, WALES, UK
Posts: 1,381
Too late now anyway it is a good camera I have one, but for The Moon it will be great
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-03-2019, 10:29 PM
Cliff (Clifford)
Registered User

Cliff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
Thanks Jeremy I guess the Moon will be my first target anyway. Maybe the Sun also .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-03-2019, 10:32 PM
Cliff (Clifford)
Registered User

Cliff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
Thanks Dunk,

Yes I looked at the sensor size and FOV handy calculators online. Also the Sony back illuminated Sensor. Have to start somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-03-2019, 10:35 PM
Cliff (Clifford)
Registered User

Cliff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
Thanks Logan, probably start out with Planets anyway. Maybe i'll still look for a cheap DSLR.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-03-2019, 10:53 PM
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy (Tony)
Local Korean Millennial

that_guy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charleville
Posts: 2,063
im sure you know this, but always worth mentioning NOT to look at the sun without a front aperture filter! especially with the 6" SCT
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18-03-2019, 08:09 AM
Cliff (Clifford)
Registered User

Cliff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
Yep quite aware Tony, the Scope came with the proper Front filter. Used to image the Sun on an a Tasco years ago on a piece of Card but of cause refractors are a different thing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18-03-2019, 10:17 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
Yes the 178 can do deep sky stuff. Its not ideal camera for anything, but superb for solar system and able to do long exposure stuff as well. Not useless. Its why I got mine and dont regret it. Solar system (planets, moon, sun) imaging require ultra fast frame rates while deep sky(galaxy,nebulae)and comets require longer exposure and usually lots of pixels too. All zwo cameras can be broken up into those two camps. The can all do both to varying degrees, some are great at one and poor at the other, the 178 is a good compromise camera of both. not ideal at either but strong for solar system but not useless at wider field.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 18-03-2019, 07:01 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 4,979
Cliff,

Use it and learn with it. You got it for a reason, and now is not the time to begin double guessing yourself and doubting the camera, your gear or yourself.

Get a larger sensor camera will cost you a packet more, and you will still have the same mountain to climb educating yourself. You've done your money now, so use this capable camera to learn. When you are ready for the next step, that larger sensor camera will be cheaper or superseded by a much better camera.

Enjoy this camera. Learn to use focal reducers with it and shorter focal length scopes to get a wider image scale. The sensor size isn't everything. Give the camera a go, it will surprise you.

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-03-2019, 09:50 AM
Cliff (Clifford)
Registered User

Cliff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
Thanks Steve,

I did research it and seemed the best compromise as you say, I guess I was attracted by the modern Sony back illuminated sensor and 6 Megapixels. I have a more technical background than Astronomer.
cheers
Cliff
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-03-2019, 09:50 AM
Cliff (Clifford)
Registered User

Cliff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
Thanks Alex,

Got your PM wont add more here
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19-03-2019, 11:03 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff View Post
I did research it and seemed the best compromise as you say, I guess I was attracted by the modern Sony back illuminated sensor and 6 Megapixels. I have a more technical background than Astronomer.
Cliff, the 178 is a good sensor...I use an ASI178MM-Cool for Deep Sky

One of the bonus features of the 178 compared to many others is the 14-bit ADC...so if you get a night of pretty stable seeing, you can dial the gain all the way down to zero and get the full dynamic range that the camera is capable of...on the Moon and the brighter planets (Venus, Mars, Jupiter) it should be a winner! (just remember to use 16-bit output in your capture program)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19-03-2019, 11:59 AM
Cliff (Clifford)
Registered User

Cliff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 130
Hi Dunk,

Yes I noticed the 14bit ADC.

Later I could add my own Peltier cooling I guess. Just starting out.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement