#1  
Old 02-09-2009, 03:32 PM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
Stellarvue SFF7-2 Flattener

Stellarvue has a relatively new flattener out, designed with a 2" focuser in mind. It is optimised for f/7, with a claim that it will work from f/6 to f/8.

It is stated as a non-reducing flattener, with a 1x result.

Pricing is $265 US at all the vendors I could find it at, not including a t-ring. This puts it a fair amount cheaper than the Borg DG-L, and the same price as the Televue 0.8x.

Has anyone given this flattener a try? I suspect it would be a good match for the Megrez 90. Stellarvue claims that it has good corner performance, in part due to its non-reducing design.

Regards,
Eric
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2009, 11:05 AM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Here are a couple of pics using a SV105 and an STL11K. Note that the SFF7-2 is designed to flatten the field for APS sized chips.

http://www.starscapeimaging.com/M48_Feb09.html
http://www.starscapeimaging.com/M44_Feb09.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2009, 11:40 AM
MrB's Avatar
MrB (Simon)
Old Man Yells at Cloud

MrB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 3,435
I was looking at this flattener when trying to decide between it, the $150 AstroTech one and a WO FF4.
Have ordered the FF4, but might look at getting one or both of the others at a (much) later date for comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2009, 12:11 PM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal View Post
Here are a couple of pics using a SV105 and an STL11K. Note that the SFF7-2 is designed to flatten the field for APS sized chips.

http://www.starscapeimaging.com/M48_Feb09.html
http://www.starscapeimaging.com/M44_Feb09.html
Is M48 a full frame? If so, it would seem to do quite a good job at the APS-C size, given that the curvature is outside of that area.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2009, 12:11 PM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrB View Post
I was looking at this flattener when trying to decide between it, the $150 AstroTech one and a WO FF4.
Have ordered the FF4, but might look at getting one or both of the others at a (much) later date for comparison.
Are you getting the new, 0.8x version of the FF4? If so, I'll be curious to see your results.

Regards,
Eric
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-09-2009, 10:40 PM
MrB's Avatar
MrB (Simon)
Old Man Yells at Cloud

MrB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 3,435
Yeah the v3, should be here soon, though it will be a while before I can do any testing... need a mount.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-09-2009, 07:52 AM
glasseyes's Avatar
glasseyes (John)
Registered User

glasseyes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SA
Posts: 107
Jerry Lodriguss review of the Televue SFF7-2

Jerry Lodriguss has written a review of the SFF7-2 flattener when used on the Stellarvue SV70ED scope. He compares the performance with an Astro-Tech 2" (AT2FF) flattener and the "William Optics 0.8x combined field flattener / telecompressor", which could be the WO flattener 2 (or perhaps an earlier model?)
Jerry's review is here
http://www.astropix.com/HTML/I_ASTRO...STS/SV70ED.HTM

There is also some relevant discussion here
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthrea...sed/sb/5/o/all

Last edited by glasseyes; 14-09-2009 at 08:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-09-2009, 05:16 PM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
Given the processing date embedded in the nebula shot near the end, which was in May, it would have to be either the WO Flat 2 or 3 to be 0.8x.

The Stellarvue definitely out performed the others tested for that focal ratio.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-09-2009, 06:49 PM
glasseyes's Avatar
glasseyes (John)
Registered User

glasseyes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SA
Posts: 107
Hmm . . . quite possible Eric, but I also found this model which is a ZS66SD APO Reducer/Flattener.
http://www.pulsar-optical.co.uk/prod.../flatener.html

See also here http://www.frontieroptics.com.au/Focal%20reducers.html

Perhaps this is the one that Jerry tested on the Stellarvue SV70ED scope?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (zs66flattener261.jpg)
13.7 KB39 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-10-2009, 05:32 PM
glasseyes's Avatar
glasseyes (John)
Registered User

glasseyes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SA
Posts: 107
Stellarvue SFF7-2 with W.O. Megrez 90

I bought a Stellarvue SFF7-2 flattener and tried it on my WO Megrez 90 with the Nikon D90 DSLR.
I have added a crop from the extreme top left region of the frame, which is where I notice the problem the most. The images were taken a week or two apart so there is a little bit of rotation present.

The SFF7-2 seems to do a pretty good job straight out of the box with no extra spacers fitted, didn't quite flatten everything right to the extreme corners of the image, but a very good result for the money.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Top left - no flattener.jpg)
60.6 KB121 views
Click for full-size image (Top left - with SFF7 flattener.jpg)
61.0 KB117 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-10-2009, 02:26 AM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
Not bad, and clearly better than the results with the WO Flat 3.

Thanks John!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-10-2009, 02:43 AM
MrB's Avatar
MrB (Simon)
Old Man Yells at Cloud

MrB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 3,435
Better than the Flat4 too, can't even get focus
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement