#1  
Old 10-12-2012, 10:56 PM
Langaandy (Andrew)
Registered User

Langaandy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 28
Focal ratio

Hi guys,

Just a question on f ratios.

What is better for DSO and astrophotograhphy in general. It's lower isn't it. Eg f/4 is better than f/5. And does this affect viewing at all.

Also my camera is connecting prime focus

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2012, 12:04 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Huge can of worms you're opening here. Ask three people this question and you'll get six different answers. See these links for interesting discussions:
http://www.stanmooreastro.com/SamplingFratioMyth.htm
http://www.stark-labs.com/help/blog/...ioAperture.php
The second one is the easiest to understand.

Also here is a long thread on Cloudy Nights on this topic
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthrea...2/Main/3085977

If you google "focal ratio myth" you'll get a lot of hits.

Geoff

Last edited by Geoff45; 11-12-2012 at 12:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2012, 12:24 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Faster f ratios favour nebula, slower f ratios favour stars.....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2012, 01:21 PM
Langaandy (Andrew)
Registered User

Langaandy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 28
okay so after a lot of reading, Cheers for the sources.

ive come to the conclusion that an 8" f/4 vs 8" f/5 for the same price is 6 of one half a dozen of the other.

i guess it comes down to the camera you are using as well.

Thanks guys
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2012, 01:29 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
I use a Vixen Fl102S refractor for my astrophotography. I operate it at f/9 (a little more, but may as well say f/9). It handles anything I point it at well, in fact VERY well, and is only "hampered" by a lack of aperture (I don't perceive it as much of a hampering really!).

I also have a dedicated f/4 astrograph R200SS Newtonian (8"). The exposures are shorter for a comparable result (not as aesthetically pleasing IMHO because of the darned diffraction spikes).

I have never put a focal reducer on the Fl102S (though do want one), but at present, I can live with it being f/9. I have taken better pictures with it than all the other scopes I have/had.

The only time I use the R200SS is when there is cloud about, as I can fit in more exposures in a shorter time span.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:35 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,837
I look at it with respect to the field of view. Lower F Ratios provide a wider FOV which is good for large nebulae, whereas higher ratios are good for a closer view, for example galaxies.

Guiding requirements vary in both as well, with the lower ratios more forgiving on errors than longer focal length.
Hence why some people have RC's at F/10 as well as Newt's at F/4 or 5.
I personally prefer lower F Ratios.
You also have to deal with Coma at faster ratios.

I guess its upto the nature of objects you want to image, your guiding setup, pixel scale, etc.
Similar for viewing. Longer focal lengths are better for planetary viewing, and shorter ones for wider views. exact same applies to Eyepieces. 9mm's are good for planets and 20mm or above is suited for DSO's.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:30 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langaandy View Post

i guess it comes down to the camera you are using as well.

Thanks guys
Yes, if you double the pixel size (or bin 2 x 2) the effect is similar to halving the focal ratio.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement