Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-11-2018, 10:53 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Kit lens test + reply to Bojan

I decided to try my kit 55-250. 600D, 55-250 @ 70mm, f/4, 5 x 15 secs
@ ISO 6400. 6400 was used as I had a strange tailing of stars, but not
caused by poor tracking, so something had to be moving during the exposure,
leaving me with a 15 sec max exposure. Lots more subs would have reduced the noise, but got clouded out.
Bojan, the Yongnuo 100MM f/2 lens is faulty, the right hand third of the field from top to bottom does not focus quite as sharply as the rest of the field, resulting in slightly larger stars. Fine for for normal photography, but naff
for astro.
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (70mm LMC irf.jpg)
147.3 KB64 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2018, 09:25 PM
Mickoid (Michael)
Registered User

Mickoid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,441
Raymo,, that's still a reasonable result. You must tell everyone you're using a Nano Tracker on a tripod now and we will be even more impressed!

The movement may be the camera connection at the ballhead. I have found if I'm shooting an object to the west of the meridian, the weight of the heavier longer focal length lens will actually loosen the screw connection as it is weighted anti clockwise on the thread.

You must make sure that connection is tight because if not, the camera will move during the exposure and cause star trailing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2018, 09:48 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
I hear what your'e saying Michael, but the camera was tight on the upper ball joint, and the upper ball joint was tight on the lower ball joint,and the lower ball joint was tight on the tracker. more importantly the target was way east of the meridian. If it stays clear I will try and sort it out tonight. Thanks for the comments.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2018, 01:18 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,915
I would be happy with that Raymo.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2018, 01:47 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Thanks Alex, yes it is o.k. for what it is; I'm currently having trouble with the
P.A. on my tracker, so am limited to very short subs.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2018, 07:23 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
...
Bojan, the Yongnuo 100MM f/2 lens is faulty, the right hand third of the field from top to bottom does not focus quite as sharply as the rest of the field, resulting in slightly larger stars. Fine for for normal photography, but naff
for astro.
raymo

The lens is not necessarily faulty, maybe just tilted. Perhaps you shoud try first if you can achieve fosul at all in that particular corner.... if yes than perhaps a piece od cirarette paper (or thin alu foil) on flange could help bringing the whole FOV into focus at the same time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement