#1  
Old 09-04-2018, 02:42 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Tracking or guiding??

The attached image is an extract from a full frame Canon D1000, 1 min image with no tracking or RA drive. The length of the trail is in RA.

The interest is the fact that although the bright star was slightly out of focus (to focus on the spectrum being obtained) the track shows the amount of atmospheric movement recorded over a one min period.

The Air Mass at the time was around 1.6

Good tracking would have compressed this wobbly line, hopefully into a "blob" which contains the extreme edges....good guiding, it is hoped, would effectively follow this "wobble" and result in smaller rounder images.

An interesting exercise.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (alp cen tracking.jpg)
2.5 KB85 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-04-2018, 07:23 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Do fluctuations in the guiding/tracking affect spectrographic readings Ken?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-04-2018, 08:11 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Good question!

For transmission gratings working "slitless" the resolution is 100% controlled by the seeing disk. The better the seeing the better the results.

For serious slit spectroscopy we use a reflective slit plate and guide on the slit gap/ target star. With good guiding (PHD2 or AstroArt) it's possible to hold a target star image on the 20 micron slit gap almost indefinitely - ten minute subs are not unusual. Total exposures can be up to two hours on faint targets.
The key is to get enough signal to give a SNR >100.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-04-2018, 11:03 PM
alex-borek
Registered User

alex-borek is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 36
Wind and some vibrations from walking around etc can do that to the image, I guess..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2018, 07:27 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Alex,
There was no wind, and during the exposure I was sitting quietly.

Comes down to Seeing and atmospherics.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2018, 07:41 AM
astro_nutt
Registered User

astro_nutt is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,013
Hi all. Now here's something to try when testing atmospherics before imaging. Brilliant!
Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2018, 07:40 PM
alex-borek
Registered User

alex-borek is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 36
What was your setup? I don't think seeing would impact that much to the image... unless it was under REALLY bad atmospheric conditions!

Last edited by alex-borek; 11-04-2018 at 01:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2018, 01:05 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Alex,
I had the ED80+transmission grating + Canon DSLR mounted on the HEQ5.
No drives operating. A 1 min exposure.
I do admit later similar images showed a much better, quieter trace.

The exercise I hoped was to give some insight into what could be determined from just a 1 min un-driven track.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-04-2018, 01:56 AM
alex-borek
Registered User

alex-borek is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 36
It seems a bit heavy for the SW standard focuser, so I am gonna stick to the wind theory! If we estimate that the "blob" was around 6" wide and the bad seeing moved it 3" (should be way more than 6" though, I get 1.36"/pixel), it would make it impossible to do any imaging, since the smallest stars you would be able to image would be just dancing around .
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-04-2018, 07:16 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Alex,
The target star was out of focus - to give a better focus on the spectrum....

I was holding the DSLR remote and having problems with the 2" adaptor - the "safety recess" (definitely the Devil's work) so I probably could have contributed to the vibration.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement