Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-08-2018, 03:32 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
A pair of spiral galaxies in Indus

After 10 months of almost exclusively using the 4deg X 4deg wide field FSQ106EDX4-PL16803 combo, I felt like doing some high resolution imaging again ...so I changed over to the AG12 this week (Just a 10sec USB cable switch around and a couple of different boxes ticked in the camera control software..easy!) and hit some galaxies

NGC 7125 and 7126 in Indus are 160 Million light years away, so are fairly faint (especially NGC 7126 - the upper galaxy which has a low surface brightness) and both quite small on the sky too at under 3 arc min in size each (a far cry from what I have been hitting with the FSQ-FLI setup in recent times ). There aren't many shots of this pair on the net which is surprising really, as they do make for a nice photogenic pair of spiral galaxies. I like the faint sweeping outer arms of NGC 7126, they remind me of NGC 1300 in Eridanus or NGC 1566 The Spanish Dancer galaxy in Dorado. There are plenty of back ground and much more distant galaxies sprinkled throughout the field too.

Conditions weren't too bad either and it was fun to be back in the higher resolution seat again...hope you enjoy the view

NGC 7125 / 7126 in Indus (full frame view)

Cheers
Mike
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC 7125 small.jpg)
112.7 KB145 views

Last edited by strongmanmike; 19-08-2018 at 03:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-08-2018, 03:41 AM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Magnificent!

A beautiful contrast between the two galaxies brought out by careful processing: one has tightly wound but faint spiral arms and a very bright warm coloured centre, the other has a small central bar and loosely wound arms with intense star formation.

As you said, the field is studded with distant galaxies and is pretty and fun to explore.

Extremely deep for 9 hours, suggesting dark skies and excellent processing.

:thum bsup:
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-08-2018, 03:57 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
Magnificent!

A beautiful contrast between the two galaxies brought out by careful processing: one has tightly wound but faint spiral arms and a very bright warm coloured centre, the other has a small central bar and loosely wound arms with intense star formation.

As you said, the field is studded with distant galaxies and is pretty and fun to explore.

Extremely deep for 9 hours, suggesting dark skies and excellent processing.

:thum bsup:
Thanks Mike (or is it Trish?...I'm guessing Mike ...) Yes, I really liked the out come, a lovely field, was well worth the two work nights I went out to my observatory and the barely 4 hrs sleep each night before going to work....

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-08-2018, 09:01 AM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
A beautiful image Mike. I missed your fantastic images of less known gems of the nightsky - please keep them coming
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-08-2018, 11:55 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Good one Mike. Good detail for such small objects. I'll miss the wide fields though.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-08-2018, 12:35 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
A beautiful image Mike. I missed your fantastic images of less known gems of the nightsky - please keep them coming
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff45 View Post
Good one Mike. Good detail for such small objects. I'll miss the wide fields though.
Geoff

Ha ha yeah sorry guys...I'll probably try and mix it up a bit more now that the novelty of the beautiful FSQ and the wide fields, has waned a little The two systems are so easily switched between and both work essentially perfectly, it sure is a cool duo to have at my fingertips

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-08-2018, 12:44 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
Nice galaxy duet Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-08-2018, 01:00 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
Nice galaxy duet Mike
Yeah it is huh?...love galaxy pairs and trios

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-08-2018, 04:43 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Hi Mike,
that's a good result on a very dim pair of galaxies.
I wanted to know more.


It seems that NGC 7125 is 163.4 Mlyrs away
https://in-the-sky.org/data/object.php?id=NGC7125
and NGC 7126 is 134.3 Mlyrs away.
https://in-the-sky.org/data/object.php?id=NGC7126
So we can assume they are not an interacting pair.

This was the only other good picture I could find:
http://server7.wikisky.org/imageView?image_id=803

Hubble did take some data but not of the entire NGC 7126
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F..._08597_606.png


cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-08-2018, 06:43 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Mike,
that's a good result on a very dim pair of galaxies.
I wanted to know more.


It seems that NGC 7125 is 163.4 Mlyrs away
https://in-the-sky.org/data/object.php?id=NGC7125
and NGC 7126 is 134.3 Mlyrs away.
https://in-the-sky.org/data/object.php?id=NGC7126
So we can assume they are not an interacting pair.

This was the only other good picture I could find:
http://server7.wikisky.org/imageView?image_id=803

Hubble did take some data but not of the entire NGC 7126
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F..._08597_606.png


cheers
Allan
Yes saw those in my search too Al, I would love Jim Riffles 18" F2.8 fork mounted Centurion 18 beauty!..in fact I know his folio of work with that scope well, in the early 2000's it was some of the best amateur imaging being done in the World and he had one located at Leyburn QLD that took that picture.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-08-2018, 06:20 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Yes saw those in my search too Al, I would love Jim Riffles 18" F2.8 fork mounted Centurion 18 beauty!..in fact I know his folio of work with that scope well, in the early 2000's it was some of the best amateur imaging being done in the World and he had one located at Leyburn QLD that took that picture.

Mike

Thanks Mike,
I didn't know that.
He certainly wasn't shy about leaving noise in his picture
yet it still looks great - a lot of detail & he's gone deep.


cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-08-2018, 10:53 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Thanks Mike,
I didn't know that.
He certainly wasn't shy about leaving noise in his picture
yet it still looks great - a lot of detail & he's gone deep.


cheers
Allan
Yes, noise in images is a little overated IMO but still, it would have been better had he collected a bit more data I am sure. Having sad that I have captured more galaxy extensions than he did and smoother, so more exposure on a smaller slower (not much slower F2.8 vs F3.8) scope can still work

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20-08-2018, 11:45 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Nice pair Mike! I also like looking around the rest of the field with cute background galaxies. There is one lot on the lower left that kind of looks like gravitational lensing. But it probably just the position of them.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 20-08-2018, 12:46 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Nice pair Mike! I also like looking around the rest of the field with cute background galaxies. There is one lot on the lower left that kind of looks like gravitational lensing. But it probably just the position of them.
Yeah I think so, capturing faint gravitational lensing arcs might be theoretically achievable with my rig and location... but rather difficult I'd say...

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 20-08-2018, 02:21 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
Been enjoying your wide field stuff, but I reeeaaaaally enjoy your obscure tiny stuff - the little galaxies and planetaries. Looking forward to more...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 20-08-2018, 02:50 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by troypiggo View Post
Been enjoying your wide field stuff, but I reeeaaaaally enjoy your obscure tiny stuff - the little galaxies and planetaries. Looking forward to more...
Yeah yeah...there will be some more coming

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 20-08-2018, 06:44 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,901
A couple of faint fuzzies eh Mike? Got the itch for some galaxies. A good image, really a 40 hour job but it still turned out well.

Pretty cool you can just quickly change a few leads and you're good to go.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 20-08-2018, 07:48 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
A beautiful result, Mikester. Needs a few worms though More seriously, good to see you doing high res imaging again just as I've gone wide-field. Ying/Yang?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 20-08-2018, 08:59 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
A couple of faint fuzzies eh Mike? Got the itch for some galaxies. A good image, really a 40 hour job but it still turned out well.
Naaah as a non automated imager, me never gunna spend that amount of time on this sort of shot, just not worth it, don't think it would have revealed anything much else anyway

Quote:
Pretty cool you can just quickly change a few leads and you're good to go.
Yeah it's great, looking forward to my next target


Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
A beautiful result, Mikester. Needs a few worms though More seriously, good to see you doing high res imaging again just as I've gone wide-field. Ying/Yang?
Yeah I used Decon too, so it can be done without unearthing those dreaded worms...it can Heck you have a mega wide field mate...camera lenses of all things ...some nice results though

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 21-08-2018, 10:10 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,944
Interesting looking pair Mike. The back ground galaxies also add to the interest.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement