#1  
Old 16-07-2013, 11:14 AM
Star Hunter
Registered User

Star Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ellesmere, Qld
Posts: 208
Lodestar: Are they worth it?

Can anyone pleases tell me if this camera is worth getting as an AG and imaging camera?

Has anyone used this camera as a stand-alone AG or do you use it only with a SX camera?

Thanks,

James
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-07-2013, 01:56 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
JaBar,
The Lodestar is not a stand alone guide system. It's just "another" CCD camera....
I use one with PHD to guide my C11 on the NEQ6pro mount.
It is very sensitive and has never let me down. I've never really tried it as a formal imaging camera - I use an ATiK314L for that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-07-2013, 02:18 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
No matter what my target, the lodestar always gets a guide star and hangs onto it. I have tried a myriad of other cameras, but the lodestar always works.
As Ken said though, it is just a camera, you will need an OAG or guidescope to use it with. I use the SX Off Axis Guider, it is super slim and the lodestar screws straight in. Well worth the investment for trouble feee guiding night after night.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-07-2013, 02:31 PM
Star Hunter
Registered User

Star Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ellesmere, Qld
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
JaBar,
The Lodestar is not a stand alone guide system. It's just "another" CCD camera....
I use one with PHD to guide my C11 on the NEQ6pro mount.
It is very sensitive and has never let me down. I've never really tried it as a formal imaging camera - I use an ATiK314L for that.
Thanks, Ken for your input. This guider is now in my sights.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-07-2013, 02:35 PM
Star Hunter
Registered User

Star Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ellesmere, Qld
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poita View Post
No matter what my target, the lodestar always gets a guide star and hangs onto it. I have tried a myriad of other cameras, but the lodestar always works.
As Ken said though, it is just a camera, you will need an OAG or guidescope to use it with. I use the SX Off Axis Guider, it is super slim and the lodestar screws straight in. Well worth the investment for trouble feee guiding night after night.
Thanks Pete. Both you and Ken have nailed it for me. It's now in my sights. Just gotta break it to the other half. Maybe I should buy it for the wife's b/day. I can just see her face when it arrives....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-07-2013, 03:33 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Hunter View Post
Thanks Pete. Both you and Ken have nailed it for me. It's now in my sights. Just gotta break it to the other half. Maybe I should buy it for the wife's b/day. I can just see her face when it arrives....
I'm sure she'll like the Lodestar, James. They are very cute

I'm using one as a guide cam with SX, SBIG and Apogee cameras. It works very well when used with full calibration. Since it is uncooled you'll get some hot pixels and a bit of glow down one edge if uncalibrated.

The only other comparable guide cam is probably the SBIG ST-i.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-07-2013, 06:21 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
+1 for the lodestar. What they said.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-07-2013, 04:45 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
+2
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-07-2013, 07:45 AM
Strawb's Avatar
Strawb (Dave)
Registered User

Strawb is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Townsville Australia
Posts: 243
Moravian G1-300 works for me - cooled too
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18-07-2013, 06:22 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
I had a lodestar but found the ZWO ASI120MM to be a far better guide camera with PHDguiding and to be an excellent planetary camera. The last point is that it's half the price of the lodestar and I feel a bit more sensitive.
Just my 2c
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 18-07-2013, 07:26 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
I also have a ASI120MM and find it to be about the same as the Lodestar in sensitivity, but it is heavier and over twice as wide, and doesn't screw nicely into my OAG. It is a good option but will depend on your setup and mounting requirements etc.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 18-07-2013, 07:38 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poita View Post
I also have a ASI120MM and find it to be about the same as the Lodestar in sensitivity, but it is heavier and over twice as wide, and doesn't screw nicely into my OAG. It is a good option but will depend on your setup and mounting requirements etc.
May be twice as wide but the ZWO is 1/4 the length. It fits perfectly on my QSI583wsg.
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 18-07-2013, 07:49 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,156
2 x loadstars and 2 x asi 120mm's. always good to have a spare
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 20-07-2013, 10:45 AM
torsion (Bram)
Registered User

torsion is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 88
The QHY5L-ii uses the same sensor as the ASI120MM, but has a similar form factor as the lodestar (see QHY5-ii series).

There is an interesting thread on CN Detailed Lodestar vs. QHY5L-ii study worth reading. Initial performance seems to favour the QHY5L-ii.

Saving up for a QHY5L-ii (~A$350 @gamaelectronics, I know not 'too' much but over here deals need to be made)

cheers,
Bram
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22-07-2013, 11:12 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,937
Jimbo, first I can imagine your wifes expression now. Ah memories.

The Loadstar is the camera. I would have got one had I not committed to the ST-I cameras. Both are essentially the same. They both have shutters and that will mean something when you go fully automated. My ST-i's do their dark prior to the first calibration image and then away it goes. The Loadstar is most likely very similar and I have heard nothing but good things about it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22-07-2013, 12:38 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Just a note for those with a qsi583wsg camera. The ZWO ASI120mm camera just screws down onto the imager as far as it will go and it's perfectly in focus with the main camera. How good is that.
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 22-07-2013, 02:36 PM
Star Hunter
Registered User

Star Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ellesmere, Qld
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Jimbo, first I can imagine your wifes expression now. Ah memories.

The Loadstar is the camera. I would have got one had I not committed to the ST-I cameras. Both are essentially the same. They both have shutters and that will mean something when you go fully automated. My ST-i's do their dark prior to the first calibration image and then away it goes. The Loadstar is most likely very similar and I have heard nothing but good things about it.
Mate, your and I go way back and we both had a great time during the start-up SEQAS. You were my star Astrophotography student!!! Ahhh.. the times we and other members had at the Manly Obs. near Wynnum, shooting film left, right and centre... Remember Dave Larkin? Davo is still vertical and send his regards.

Anyway, will the Lodestar work as good on its own with PHD or does it work better with say the SXVR M25C? (which I have on order from AEC). I've got my Starizona C14 Hyperstar (tapered model) up for grabs on Gumtree so if I can sell that off, it will pay for the Lodestar. I'm also looking at setting up a robotic telescope center at home here with three, LX200 GPS 14's with Hyperstar optics and SXVR M25C cameras.

BTW, do you know of anyone who has used or is using, the SBIG guider? I know its expensive but SBIG never fault on their products. Will call you tonight.

Jimbo

Last edited by Star Hunter; 22-07-2013 at 03:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 22-07-2013, 02:58 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Hunter View Post
Mate, your and I go way back and we both had a great time during the start-up SEQAS. You were my star Astrophotograohy student. The times we and other membersspent at the Manly Obs. shooting film left, right and centre...remember Dave Larkin? Davo is stiill vertical and send his regards..

With the Lodestar, will it work just as good on its own with PHD or does it work better with say the SXVR M25C (which I have on order from AEC). I've got my Starizona C14 Hyperstar (tapered model) up for grabs on Gumtree so if I can sell that off, it will pay for the Lodestar.

BTW, do you know of anyone who has used or is using, the SBIG guider? I know its expensive but SBIG never fault on their products. Will call you tonight.

Jimbo
Ah yes those were the days, falling asleep at the guider EP. Things have changed a lot in the interim. Say hello to Dave for me.

Do I know someone using an SBIG guider ? Yep me. I have two of them and each works really well and connects perfectly. It takes darks automatically and that improves its ability to pick a guide star.

I can't help with the loadstar but as I understand it they are very similar to the SBIG ST-I (almost carbon copies), based on what I have experienced with the SBIG I would say the Loadstar would be a good buy too.

Give me a call tonight.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 22-07-2013, 02:58 PM
naskies's Avatar
naskies (Dave)
Registered User

naskies is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by torsion View Post
There is an interesting thread on CN Detailed Lodestar vs. QHY5L-ii study worth reading. Initial performance seems to favour the QHY5L-ii.
One important point made by the author is that although the QHY5L-ii is more sensitive than the Lodestar per unit area, the Lodestar can often be more sensitive overall due to its substantially larger pixels. Interestingly, the QHYL-ii apparently can't do on-chip binning (as a CMOS sensor) therefore I assume that its smaller pixels may make it a better guide camera for short focal length imaging (better star sampling)?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Hunter View Post
With the Lodestar, will it work just as good on its own with PHD or does it work better with say the SXVR M25C (which I have on order from AEC).
I use my Lodestar with an SBIG camera (and an SX AO unit) - works great.

Quote:
BTW, do you know of anyone who has used or is using, the SBIG guider? I know its expensive but SBIG never fault on their products. Will call you tonight.
I have an SBIG ST-i that came with my camera, currently in use as an over-priced finder. The Lodestar has a larger chip (6.2x4.9 mm on the Lodestar vs 4.8x3.6 mm for the ST-i) and therefore larger field of view.

One *big* plus for the ST-i is the mechanical shutter - automatic dark frames at the ambient temperature means that the images are usually cleaner. My Lodestar doesn't have a shutter, but I use a dark library that works pretty well most of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 22-07-2013, 11:54 PM
johnnyt123 (John)
Registered User

johnnyt123 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belmore, NSW
Posts: 363
I need a guide cam.
So which is the better one?

ASI120MM, SBIG STi, qhy5l-ii or lodestar???

Decisions decisions.......
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement