Can anyone recommend a good OTA that would suit a NEQ6 pro mount that i could use for planetary imaging? I'm going to use my modified canon dslr, a televue powermate and backyard EOS to capture. My budget would be around $1500 if i can sell my beloved 12inch dob...(i was contemplating to somehow use the dob on the mount but i think it would be too heavy)
Hmm. As i have a 102mm f5.1 refractor, i'm wondering if something like a 5x televue powermate may give me the focal length i need? Am i being too naive? Any thoughts ?
Thanks for the replies..
I have an Edge HD8 for sale in the Classified's right now, it's a pretty good planetary scope native f10 focal length is 2032mm, and that goes out to f20 @ 4064mm with a 2x Barlow. It is light enough for an NEQ6.
I would be buying a planetary camera capable of high frame rate video, that way you do not have to worry about guiding (and long focal length guiding is a real art which requires good gear). The ASI224MC is a reasonablly priced planetary camera.
Even better was a 12” tri-schiefspiegler that Barry Adcock built (ASV) long ago. From memory probably f/23. I can recall photos taken of the planets - on FILM - through that which were superb even compared to modern efforts.
Hmm. As i have a 102mm f5.1 refractor, i'm wondering if something like a 5x televue powermate may give me the focal length i need? Am i being too naive? Any thoughts ?
Thanks for the replies..
Small aperture will significantly limit resolution for planetarny imaging. So while a 4" scope is quite capable for long exposure astrophotography, it is not the best choice for planetary imaging if one is after sharp and detailed planetary images.
Thanks for all your help. While my dob is great, it's collapsible so the truss slides into tubes on the outside of the ota - so tube rings wont go around it to secure it to the mount.
I think the best way foward is to sell my dob and modded dslr. I'm leaning toward a c9.25....
A C9.25" will ride comfortably on your proposed mount, and even on a Celestron AVX, both for visual and for imaging.
Using a high frame dedicated planetary camera is the best way forward to do planetary imaging (along with a good quality 1.25" Barlow to achieve the necessary long focal length).
A key benefit of the C9.25" is that it is the only one in the range with a primary having a focal ratio of f2.5 - the rest being f2. This results in the C9.25" having the reputation of consistently better optics than the rest of the bunch as figuring a f2.5 mirror is easier than a f2 mirror.
I was at a friend's house last night observing from his C9.25" actually - on the AVX and we went through about 40 objects in just under two hours. The mount performed flawlessly.
As for planetary, he has used his C9.25 lately for Neptune and Jupiter - again, no issues with the mount.
The C9.25 being anything special is anecdotal. Celestron's shift in manufacturing from the USA to China is much more significant. Since that happened, there are a lot of reports of their SCTs in all sizes with good optics. Damian Peach once used a C9.25 but now uses a C14.
Regardless of what scope you use, what's most important is good collimation, good focus and good seeing
The C9.25 being anything special is anecdotal. Celestron's shift in manufacturing from the USA to China is much more significant. Since that happened, there are a lot of reports of their SCTs in all sizes with good optics. Damian Peach once used a C9.25 but now uses a C14.
Regardless of what scope you use, what's most important is good collimation, good focus and good seeing
Damian Peach has the luxury of a permanent setup (lucky him!).
The C9.25 despite having a larger central obstruction, has been noted many times as having good optics relative to the other scopes in the range. And while many reasons have been flouted for this, the usual one is the "gentler" focal ratio of the primary mirror.
As to it's status as special - no, it's not. It will not do wonders Vs the others in the range, but it is relatively much more portable than a C11. Of course, usual rules about aperture mattering do apply, subject to proper cooling along with the other parameters you mention
Steven you collimate with a star, it's free and the best way to go. I use Metaguide to assist with the process and once you have learnt the software it's really easy and best of all Metaguide is free.
Another option is to stack the focused star images or video and then sharpen a little bit to judge which way you have to move the secondary mirror. This method probably doesn't suit beginners in my opinion.
Best of luck
p.s
Planetary imaging can be really frustrating at first, but stick with it and eventually the results will come once you overcome the steep learning curve
͡° ͜ʖ ͡°
Yes. The 6" Mak by skywatcher.
It's surprisingly good for the price, and is often available around $400 S/H.
With an f12 and 1800mm, it gives good contrast, colour, and magnification.
Coming in late....
I’ve used all the Meade Lx200,8”,10”,12” and then moved to Celestron....
I had the C925 for a few years, then stupidly sold it!! Big mistake. It was one of the best SCT I ever used.
Replaced it and was VERY happy, until my wife bought me a C11...
I couldn’t sell HER telescope so the C925 went......
The C11 meets all my needs for spectroscopy........but I still miss the C925.
No matter what is said, it definitely punches above it’s weight.
If I needed another SCT it would definitely be a C925.
I'm leaning toward a c9.25....
