ANZAC Day
Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-09-2017, 08:34 AM
PKay's Avatar
PKay (Peter)
Registered User

PKay is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: DEPOT BEACH
Posts: 1,643
Filters - Basic understanding

Hi All

Most of you will find this a very basic question, but I wouldn't ask if I didn't know...

When you use for example a Ha filter (656 nm).

Does the filter stop that frequency, or only allow that frequency?

What is the difference between a 5nm and 7nm filter (aside from 2nm)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-09-2017, 08:53 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Peter,
Each filter works by blocking certain wavelengths and transmitting others.
The Ha filter (DSO imaging) is designed to block all wavelengths other than those centred on the Ha wavelength.
If you look at the transmission curve of each filter the transmission width is usually given as the FWHM (Full Width Half Max) in Angstroms or nm. (1 nm =10A)
The narrower the FWHM the less background light (around the target wavelength) from the surrounding area is allowed through - highlighting the selected emission band (ie Ha).
Similar for the other DSO filters - Sii, OIII, H beta etc.
Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-09-2017, 04:34 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
I've got a 3nm Ha filter, it allows 656 +-1.5nm so it allows 654.5-657.5nm to pass through. A 12nm filter will pass 656 +-6nm so 650-662nm.

The tighter the filter the more contrast you get as you're blocking more of the unwanted light.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-09-2017, 07:57 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
Is it sort of a bell curve relationship? eg using Colin's example 656 +-1.5nm would 656nm wavelength be 100% transmitted (ignoring loss from filter glass etc) and 657.5nm be almost 0% transmitted, say 0.1%, 657.4nm maybe 0.23%. Not in a straight linear relationship, but more akin to a bell curve?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-09-2017, 08:23 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,943
3nm means wavelength 1.5nm away from centre will be attenuated by 50% (3dB down, for RF people)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-09-2017, 08:43 AM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by PKay View Post
Hi All

Most of you will find this a very basic question, but I wouldn't ask if I didn't know...

When you use for example a Ha filter (656 nm).

Does the filter stop that frequency, or only allow that frequency?

What is the difference between a 5nm and 7nm filter (aside from 2nm)?
That sort of filter is a bandpass filter (allows a certain frequency band to pass). In astro people often refer to it as a narrowband or line (spectral line) filter. In your example, the centre frequency for that filter has a wavelength of 656 nanometers (nm) and has a bandwidth (width of the range of wavelengths passed) of between 5 or 7 nm, and when specified fully, usually by the manufacturer, is based on a given signal intensity limit such as the 3dB, 6dB or other dB or possibly even %Signal Intensity bandwidth. The 3dB and 6dB bandwidths are commonly used in science, eng. , electronics etc... and for example:
* The 3dB bandwidth is the width of this band from the lower -3dB (~71% signal*) extreme to the upper -3dB (~71% signal*) extreme whereas,
* The 6dB bandwidth is the width of this band from the lower -6dB (~50% signal*) extreme to the upper -6dB (~50% signal*) extreme.
A pic is better and I'll post one if I can find it.

Best
JA

*Percentage quoted is for signal, NOT signal power

Last edited by JA; 19-09-2017 at 08:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-09-2017, 08:49 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Here's a typical filter transmission curve ....
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Harrison Fig 4_3.jpg)
32.1 KB12 views
Click for full-size image (ofil-bp-fhal-1-2.jpg)
73.1 KB12 views
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-09-2017, 10:37 AM
ChrisV's Avatar
ChrisV (Chris)
Registered User

ChrisV is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,738
We often stretch the hell out of our pictures - well I do anyway.

Given that we are boosting small signals relative to larger ones I imagine that the "effective width" of our bandpass filters is a lot more than than the half width stated in the filter specs ? Or maybe the bandpass filters have a really steep slope at the cuff off frequencies so this is negligible ?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-09-2017, 11:04 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Google: astrodon filters transmission curves

The attached is pretty typical...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (astrodon_rgb_filter_transmission_series_E.gif)
15.6 KB9 views
Click for full-size image (G_HA_12nm_u_6nm.png)
86.2 KB10 views

Last edited by Merlin66; 19-09-2017 at 11:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-09-2017, 07:29 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV View Post
We often stretch the hell out of our pictures - well I do anyway.

Given that we are boosting small signals relative to larger ones I imagine that the "effective width" of our bandpass filters is a lot more than than the half width stated in the filter specs ? Or maybe the bandpass filters have a really steep slope at the cuff off frequencies so this is negligible ?
The "stray" signal is mixed with the "real" signal in pixels so they both get stretched together by the same amount. There's no mechanism that stretches the extreme ends of the pass band more than the middle.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement