Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-09-2017, 11:19 PM
Terere (Dom)
Registered User

Terere is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Gold Coast Hinterlands
Posts: 6
Ngc 253

First test run getting a guided shot. This is one frame straight from the camera (well compressed a good deal when I moved it from my camera to my phone)
Esprit 80, Fuji X-M1, 8 minutes at ISO 200, some light pollution.

Previously I was lucky to get 90 seconds, so I'm feeling like I'm getting somewhere.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2017_0912_22103400.jpg)
43.4 KB88 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-09-2017, 07:20 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,920
And you should be happy with such a fine result.
Get a few more do a stack and procees and I think you will have arrived.
Great effort.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-09-2017, 08:05 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
Yes, excellent start. Get some more and add them up.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-09-2017, 09:39 AM
doppler's Avatar
doppler (Rick)
Registered User

doppler is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mackay
Posts: 1,656
That's a great start, nice pin point stars so good focus and tracking. My only question is why go so low with the iso? Most camera's have a "sweet" spot re iso below which you greatly increase exposure time with little gain in lowering noise levels. My canon 1100d is best at 800 iso.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-09-2017, 11:34 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
Great start Dom, good to see another Fuji user

The sweet spot for the Fujis tend to be at ISO800 (pure coincidence with some Canons, the sensors are not related). You'll see a lot more signal at 800 and no more noise, and you'll be able to get away with shorter exposures.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-09-2017, 12:57 PM
Terere (Dom)
Registered User

Terere is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Gold Coast Hinterlands
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by doppler View Post
That's a great start, nice pin point stars so good focus and tracking. My only question is why go so low with the iso? Most camera's have a "sweet" spot re iso below which you greatly increase exposure time with little gain in lowering noise levels. My canon 1100d is best at 800 iso.
I was just seeing how long I could get an exposure for this as a test, just kept halving the iso and doubling the exposure till I got to the lowest iso setting on my camera to compare results.

In the full resolution there are tiny little tails on the stars at all exposures. Not sure if that's just a bit of wind or some movement between the T adapter and the camera body. Any good suggestions on some really thin material I could make a shim with to see if that changes anything?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-09-2017, 04:49 PM
doppler's Avatar
doppler (Rick)
Registered User

doppler is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mackay
Posts: 1,656
A little tail would suggest some sort of vibration on one axis, I have had that happen on occasion with a slight breeze. Guiding errors just tend to make stars oval shaped. Aluminum cans are pretty thin and make good shim material.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement