Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-06-2020, 12:31 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,157
100 perscent luna - doesnt smell like strawberries

captured last night - 100 percent luna
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2020-06-05-1337_3-Moon_lapl4_ap8680rspsorientedweb.jpg)
199.8 KB75 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2020, 12:50 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
captured last night - 100 percent luna
Nicely done. I got up at 5.00am to see whether the penumbral eclipse was worth imaging...it wasn't...a geez it was cold ....I bailed and went back to bed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2020, 01:15 PM
Quopaz (Nick)
Registered User

Quopaz is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: South Australia
Posts: 236
Nice moon, I haven't worked out how to fit the whole moon in my DSLR yet. With a 2x barlow it's too big and doesn't fit. Without the barlow I can't get focus. Only way I can do it is with my little camera, afocally through the 25mm eyepiece. Not ideal. Moon looked pretty good when it was full a couple nights ago but I was at work.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2020, 01:16 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Nicely done. I got up at 5.00am to see whether the penumbral eclipse was worth imaging...it wasn't...a geez it was cold ....I bailed and went back to bed.
Peter I just got to the 100 % mark and called it, I did have an aldi pink heated blanket over my legs and lap set on high. It was 4 degrees in the dome
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2020, 01:18 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quopaz View Post
Nice moon, I haven't worked out how to fit the whole moon in my DSLR yet. With a 2x barlow it's too big and doesn't fit. Without the barlow I can't get focus. Only way I can do it is with my little camera, afocally through the 25mm eyepiece. Not ideal. Moon looked pretty good when it was full a couple nights ago but I was at work.
You might need a 2inch extension which you can get from one of the astro emporiums.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2020, 07:42 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,943
Nice capture, I was out with Binos from 445 to 525 but moon was so bright I could not see any shadow area at all. Glad I did not setup was cold , not as cold as Monday night though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-06-2020, 10:01 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 25,759
What a fantastic shot mate !!!!

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-06-2020, 11:59 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,157
OK so I played with some other data from Friday night, these images were native capture, is without a reducer, and had to be stitched together. So there is a subtle differences between the two. Question is does it appeal to any one?
Seeing as though most people don't look at lunar shots I could die holding my breath on a response..........
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (fullmoon05062020rspsweb.jpg)
201.2 KB15 views
Click for full-size image (fullmoon05062020rspssatweb.jpg)
204.5 KB10 views
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-06-2020, 12:39 PM
jahnpahwa (JP)
Registered User

jahnpahwa is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Canberra, AUS
Posts: 593
Yeah, I like the native capture here, the cooler hue version in particular.

I'm a newcomer, but I've been spending a lot of time thinking about astroimages and I guess a spend a fair bit of time thinking about them. Your first post shows more contrast and seems to reveal a bit more detail, but while it does that, it seems to bring the subject closer and seems "louder" and more accessible. Your native, cool version (and even the warmer yellower one) give the impression of a huge thing a very long way away, while not really giving up much detail at all. Its subtle, and perhaps this wasnt the feedback you were after?

In general, I think keeping things (solar system and beyond) looking like they're a long way away is good, and while it's impossible to convey a sense of the size of things (especially DSOs) I think an imager has done well when I look at something and think "whoa thats massive!". I've been struggling with my images, thinking that they all look like cartoons that depict something real, rather than looking real themselves, and wonder if I'm loosing that realness in my quest for detail.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-06-2020, 01:56 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by jahnpahwa View Post
Yeah, I like the native capture here, the cooler hue version in particular.

I'm a newcomer, but I've been spending a lot of time thinking about astroimages and I guess a spend a fair bit of time thinking about them. Your first post shows more contrast and seems to reveal a bit more detail, but while it does that, it seems to bring the subject closer and seems "louder" and more accessible. Your native, cool version (and even the warmer yellower one) give the impression of a huge thing a very long way away, while not really giving up much detail at all. Its subtle, and perhaps this wasnt the feedback you were after?

In general, I think keeping things (solar system and beyond) looking like they're a long way away is good, and while it's impossible to convey a sense of the size of things (especially DSOs) I think an imager has done well when I look at something and think "whoa thats massive!". I've been struggling with my images, thinking that they all look like cartoons that depict something real, rather than looking real themselves, and wonder if I'm loosing that realness in my quest for detail.
Thanks for your feedback. I'd rather get feedback like that than politeness. There is a definite fine line between good and oh dear what have you done
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement