Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-10-2014, 06:00 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Guiding and mount control??

OK, I've got to ask.....
Our "usual" guiding software (PHD etc.) can provide guide correction signals (+/-RA and +/- Dec) to within 0.1 arc sec (depending on the guide set-up) but how accurate are the actual MOUNT corrections??
Even if you pulse the corrections do you ACTUALLY get this level of drive control from your mount???
I'm thinking of the generic HEQ5/NEQ6 SW mounts.
Open to discussion/ comment.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-10-2014, 10:24 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Hmmm - no comments?
The NEQ/HEQ mounts have 1.8 degree stepper motors and a gear ratio of 1:705 this gives 9.19 arc sec/ step.
The guide rates in Synscan go down to x0.125 Sidereal rate (=15 arc sec/ sec / 8 = 1.8 arc sec/ sec
By my reckoning too achieve a guide correction of 0.1 arc sec, the motor would have to be micro-stepped at 9.19/0.1 = 1/92 steps to give the required correction.
Based on the lowest Synscan guide rate it would require a pulse of 1/18 sec....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-10-2014, 04:25 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Andy from the PHD2 team has replied:

PHD2 will attempt to send small pulses in the 1-10 ms range to the mount. Some mounts are able to honor these small guide pulse commands; but, if the guide pulse duration is too short for the mount, the mount ignores it. The tracking error accumulates, and PHD sends a larger pulse. In this way PHD and the mount can reach a kind of equilibrium to achieve tracking performance close to the error that phd2 can measure on the guider chip and the smallest pulses that the mount can react to.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-10-2014, 04:54 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
Andy from the PHD2 team has replied:

PHD2 will attempt to send small pulses in the 1-10 ms range to the mount. Some mounts are able to honor these small guide pulse commands; but, if the guide pulse duration is too short for the mount, the mount ignores it. The tracking error accumulates, and PHD sends a larger pulse. In this way PHD and the mount can reach a kind of equilibrium to achieve tracking performance close to the error that phd2 can measure on the guider chip and the smallest pulses that the mount can react to.
That makes sense, the actual mount movement doesnt matter really, given setting agressiveness is a suck it and see excercise, and as above, if a correction is too much/little, the next one compensates.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-10-2014, 05:33 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
I understand....but what if your mount doesn't/ won't react to the short pulse commands......
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-10-2014, 09:41 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,064
Then I think you're in for a world of pain. I can't see how you'd be able to get decent results with such a setup, since the corrections would either be large or ignored?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-10-2014, 05:12 AM
SteveInNZ
Registered User

SteveInNZ is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 239
It's a closed loop system like you, the gas pedal and the speedo when you're driving. You give it a little bit and nothing noticeable happens so you give it a bit more until something does happen. That will probably take you too far so you'll back off a little and then a little more. Eventually you'll settle at a point where the on again/off again matches the minimum amount of controllable movement the car/mount (system) can work over.
Control loop tuning is a form of wizadry that plays off optimum response against stability. You really want to be at the stable end.

Steve.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-10-2014, 07:39 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
The question is why would you want to make a correction of 0.1" when the seeing is probably never going to be better than 1.5"? Your mount will be trying to make unnecessary corrections that will never be visible. The fewer corrections you have to make, the better will be your guiding. See here http://www.ccdware.com/resources/autoguidercalcv4.cfm for a good discussion.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-10-2014, 08:05 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Geof,
I agree.
The issue was if the guider has a significantly different plate scale from the imaging system, say 10:1, a 0.1 arc sec guide correction may result in a 1 arc sec "correction" in the imaging...
I was just interested to see how the mount could interact with the guide signals to achieve such an outcome.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement