Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-08-2015, 07:34 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,898
Tilt /tip adapters

I am thinking about putting a tilt tip adapter in my imaging setup just in front of my camera filter wheel. At the moment I have 2 packers packing out the top of my camera as it flexes slightly downwards.

Does anyone know of an adapter on the market for this? The FLI Filter wheel has about a 75mm opening.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-08-2015, 08:57 AM
Joshua Bunn's Avatar
Joshua Bunn (Joshua)
Registered User

Joshua Bunn is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albany, Western Australia
Posts: 1,462
Hi Greg,
Optec make one...http://www.optecinc.com/astronomy/catalog/19380.htm

Josh
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-08-2015, 10:17 AM
cfranks (Charles)
Registered User

cfranks is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tungkillo, South Australia
Posts: 599
I made a very similar device to the above, a couple of years ago. The two plates are spring loaded together and forced apart by tapered screws. My springs were 35Kg load but there was still a movement of the plates with different telescope position. I subsequently made one similar to http://www.optcorp.com/telescope-acc...rc6-and-8.html where the two plates are locked together and thus no variable sag, as it were. A much better design. There are various sizes at Optcorp, Telescop-express.de and Bintel (I think) and you should be able to get something suitable for your rig

Charles
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-08-2015, 11:23 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Bunn View Post
Thanks Josh. Looks to be almost perfect but no longer made. Also too thick. I only have 8mm to spare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfranks View Post
I made a very similar device to the above, a couple of years ago. The two plates are spring loaded together and forced apart by tapered screws. My springs were 35Kg load but there was still a movement of the plates with different telescope position. I subsequently made one similar to http://www.optcorp.com/telescope-acc...rc6-and-8.html where the two plates are locked together and thus no variable sag, as it were. A much better design. There are various sizes at Optcorp, Telescop-express.de and Bintel (I think) and you should be able to get something suitable for your rig

Charles
Thanks Charles. Perhaps I should make my own.2 plates with adjusting grub screws may do it. The lacking out is working but I think th eflex is slightly variable with the angle but not by much.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-08-2015, 01:23 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
There is this one: http://myastroshop.com.au/products/d...p?id=MAS-005K4
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-08-2015, 01:36 PM
niharika
Registered User

niharika is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: melbourne
Posts: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Thanks Josh. Looks to be almost perfect but no longer made. Also too thick. I only have 8mm to spare.



Thanks Charles. Perhaps I should make my own.2 plates with adjusting grub screws may do it. The lacking out is working but I think th eflex is slightly variable with the angle but not by much.

Greg.
Hi Greg, are you getting some sort of flex somewhere in the imaging train? Does the tip/tilt change across sky if you measure through ccdinspector? what's the back focus of the adapter between FLI FW and MOAG (assuming that's how the setup is). Few people found that getting a 0 length adapter between FLI FW and Moag allowed them to shave off some backfocus and reduce the flex due to thin front plate of the filter wheel. Just some thought.

Last edited by niharika; 13-08-2015 at 02:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-08-2015, 02:23 PM
rally
Registered User

rally is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 896
Greg,

Niharika is on the right track

If you have tilt - you have a measurable problem.

Can you identify the source of the problem and solve that first.

If there is a fault, then fix it, if there is flex in an adapter or fitting then its either faulty or not suitable for the loads involved - get a better one.
I will assume that its in the optical train as opposed to mirror alignment ?

That would be my approach

Rally
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-08-2015, 03:04 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
Thanks for that Lewis.

Quote:
Originally Posted by niharika View Post
Hi Greg, are you getting some sort of flex somewhere in the imaging train? Does the tip/tilt change across sky if you measure through ccdinspector? what's the back focus of the adapter between FLI FW and MOAG (assuming that's how the setup is). Few people found that getting a 0 length adapter between FLI FW and Moag allowed them to shave off some backfocus and reduce the flex due to thin front plate of the filter wheel. Just some thought.
Hi Raki. Thanks for that. I'll check that out. Astrodonb has a zero length adapter for the MMOAG?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rally View Post
Greg,

Niharika is on the right track

If you have tilt - you have a measurable problem.

Can you identify the source of the problem and solve that first.

If there is a fault, then fix it, if there is flex in an adapter or fitting then its either faulty or not suitable for the loads involved - get a better one.
I will assume that its in the optical train as opposed to mirror alignment ?

That would be my approach

Rally
Thanks Rally. It appears to be at the junction of the filter wheel and the adapter to the MMOAG. That adapter is only 2mm thick. If I grab the camera and flex on it I can see some slight movement under stress at that point. Raki's suggestion may be spot on. Definitely not the mirror as I have gotten perfect round stars to the corners many times.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-08-2015, 03:44 PM
niharika
Registered User

niharika is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: melbourne
Posts: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Thanks Josh. Looks to be almost perfect but no longer made. Also too thick. I only have 8mm to spare.



Thanks Charles. Perhaps I should make my own.2 plates with adjusting grub screws may do it. The lacking out is working but I think th eflex is slightly variable with the angle but not by much.

Greg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Thanks for that Lewis.



Hi Raki. Thanks for that. I'll check that out. Astrodonb has a zero length adapter for the MMOAG?



Thanks Rally. It appears to be at the junction of the filter wheel and the adapter to the MMOAG. That adapter is only 2mm thick. If I grab the camera and flex on it I can see some slight movement under stress at that point. Raki's suggestion may be spot on. Definitely not the mirror as I have gotten perfect round stars to the corners many times.

Greg.
If you ask Ashley of preciseparts he will know about it as he already made a few including mine. He may initially complain that its a bit risky and stuff but i think its quite ok. This way the whole body of the Moag is supporting the weight and pressure is spread out on a larger area compared of having a adapter sticking out in between.

But if the tilt is constant on different part and orientation it might well be coming from somewhere else.

This is overall an interesting area. For example when I got my 3nm filters from Astrodon I saw that their edges were blackened with paint. My initialy thought was would they still sit "Perfectly square"? I don't know and thankfully I don't have a f 3.8 scope. Overall I don't think its coming from Scope or the CCD itself. So it can be from anything else in the imaging train and it can be hard/expensive to figure out what exactly is causing it. I believe Peter Ward once posted something on how he could measure required shimming thickness based on some calculation derived from auto focusing. I know he uses quite high end component like you so does that indicate tilt is unavoidable time to time when you have few items sitting in between? One thing for sure once you start getting perfect stars in all corners you would be reluctant to touch it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-08-2015, 10:55 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,898
Thanks Raki. I'll email Ashley about it and see what he's got. So the adapter has a plate that covers a larger part of the filter wheel face?

I increased the shim thickness from .27mm to .34mm and it seemed to make a difference. Not 100% perfect but probably not worth chasing any further.I'll wait til I finish the current imaging project (I consider it operational and ready for imaging and have been) I may experiment with a few different thicknesses. Perhaps a tad thicker than even this.

I'll also be imaging with smaller sensors at times so it won't be an issue with them.


Greg.


Quote:
Originally Posted by niharika View Post
If you ask Ashley of preciseparts he will know about it as he already made a few including mine. He may initially complain that its a bit risky and stuff but i think its quite ok. This way the whole body of the Moag is supporting the weight and pressure is spread out on a larger area compared of having a adapter sticking out in between.

But if the tilt is constant on different part and orientation it might well be coming from somewhere else.

This is overall an interesting area. For example when I got my 3nm filters from Astrodon I saw that their edges were blackened with paint. My initialy thought was would they still sit "Perfectly square"? I don't know and thankfully I don't have a f 3.8 scope. Overall I don't think its coming from Scope or the CCD itself. So it can be from anything else in the imaging train and it can be hard/expensive to figure out what exactly is causing it. I believe Peter Ward once posted something on how he could measure required shimming thickness based on some calculation derived from auto focusing. I know he uses quite high end component like you so does that indicate tilt is unavoidable time to time when you have few items sitting in between? One thing for sure once you start getting perfect stars in all corners you would be reluctant to touch it.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14-08-2015, 09:17 AM
niharika
Registered User

niharika is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: melbourne
Posts: 216
In zero length adapter the the dovetail end finishes exactly where the threaded part ends for the filterwheel. So the body of the moag will sit flush against the filterwheel plate. I have the adapter for mega moag, I believe you have monster moag. The opening are the same so no problem there. Just check the guider port is fine and won't get on the way if you reduce that 2mm backfocus of current adapter. I will try to take a picture later tonight to show what I mean.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15-08-2015, 06:54 PM
PRejto's Avatar
PRejto (Peter)
Registered User

PRejto is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rylstone, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,398
This is too thick, but seems quite sturdy and precise:

http://www.gerdneumann.net/english/a...ting-unit.html

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15-08-2015, 07:07 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,898
Thanks Peter. That looks very good. Expensive but good.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 15-08-2015, 07:11 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,898
Come to think of it the measurement of th etilt could be done by having the centre of the image in focus and noting the focuser step number. Then refocusing the corner where the tilt is until its in focus. Subtract that from the original position (1000 steps = 1mm) and express it in mm.

The only problem with that is the tilt cause radial stars on the Honders in the corner affected and I don't think it would necessarily come to focus and change that. It might but I don't think so.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-08-2015, 09:24 AM
niharika
Registered User

niharika is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: melbourne
Posts: 216
Zero Length Adapter in between moag and the FW
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moagAdapter.jpg)
106.5 KB57 views
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-08-2015, 12:30 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,898
That's very good. I'll definitely talk to Ashley.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement