Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-02-2018, 02:25 PM
TLundstrom
Registered User

TLundstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 4
Skywatcher ED80 Espirit-your experience?

Thinking of buying a Skywatcher ED80 Espirit for wide field astrophotography and just wanted to hear from others your experiences good and bad.
I am looking to buy a good quality 80mm refractor, what do you think is best?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-02-2018, 06:59 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,921
They are a cloud magnet.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-02-2018, 07:11 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
While on the topic of quality, CFF has a limited edition of 80mm f6.9 triplets build around fpl 53, with dedicated field corrector. They come with 2.5" FTF. These are constructed one by one and hand aspherised. There are also still a few 92mm f/6 units available for ordering as far as I know.

There are cheaper options, but you mentioned quality...

EDIT: I think an ultimate around 80mm refractor for imaging would have to be FSQ-85. Another significantly cheaper alternative could be TS-Optics-86SDQ - apparently it has a 60mm corrected circle...

Last edited by Slawomir; 20-02-2018 at 08:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-02-2018, 07:36 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
I was going to get the Esprit 80 to go with my Esprit 120 for a portable set up but went for the Sky Rover 80mm Sextuplit for about the same proce as the esprit, build quality is excellent and far better focuser...yet to test image quality out in the field. a 80mm F4.4 with large flat field is just what I wanted.
https://www.astronomyalive.com.au/te...telescope.html
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-02-2018, 09:39 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
There are a LOT of cheap 80mm APO refractors to choose from:

- Skywatcher,
- Orion,
- CFF,
- Explore Scientific,
- Teleskop-Express,
- Stellavue,
- APM,
- SkyRover,
- AliExpress (if you want to go very cheap)....

The 70-120mm market is very crowded, and it will thin out, IMHO. Many are clearly from the same source in China, rebadged; the only real difference being which focusser is fitted and the label.

Notably absent are the long-term players such as LZOS and AP.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-02-2018, 09:55 PM
tmz (Tim)
Registered User

tmz is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
They are a cloud magnet.
Alex


Love it
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-02-2018, 09:24 AM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
The Esprit 80 I owned had very nice optics and a filter could be mounted inside the flattener adapter. The focuser lock had to be partly engaged in order to hold weight, though it was still easy to use in that fashion. Skywatcher Australia after sales service/warranty is decent if you do have any problems with the scope.

The Esprit 80 is good for APS-C; if you want to cover full frame you'd need to go up to an Esprit 100. I recall reading that the 100 did not have an internal mount for a filter.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-02-2018, 12:10 PM
scopey's Avatar
scopey (Les)
Registered User

scopey is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Grovedale Geelong
Posts: 18
I own an Espirit ed 80 and from an optical point of view can't fault it. I also own a tsa 102 Tak, and find it very hard to see the difference. Stars in the ed 80 are as good as I have seen nice and tight. I have tested it out on doubles with an eyepiece combo 5mm radian + 2 times Ultima barlow and what a beautiful airy disc, still nice and tight. Don't like the captains wheel though. My focuser is excellent. I have owned telescopes since the age of 14 I am now 74.

scopey
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22-02-2018, 12:37 AM
TLundstrom
Registered User

TLundstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by scopey View Post
I own an Espirit ed 80 and from an optical point of view can't fault it. I also own a tsa 102 Tak, and find it very hard to see the difference. Stars in the ed 80 are as good as I have seen nice and tight. I have tested it out on doubles with an eyepiece combo 5mm radian + 2 times Ultima barlow and what a beautiful airy disc, still nice and tight. Don't like the captains wheel though. My focuser is excellent. I have owned telescopes since the age of 14 I am now 74.

scopey
Thank you for your experienced appraisal, I was thinking the Espirit would be far inferior to a Tak
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22-02-2018, 12:39 AM
TLundstrom
Registered User

TLundstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by casstony View Post
The Esprit 80 I owned had very nice optics and a filter could be mounted inside the flattener adapter. The focuser lock had to be partly engaged in order to hold weight, though it was still easy to use in that fashion. Skywatcher Australia after sales service/warranty is decent if you do have any problems with the scope.

The Esprit 80 is good for APS-C; if you want to cover full frame you'd need to go up to an Esprit 100. I recall reading that the 100 did not have an internal mount for a filter.
Yes I am using a FF Canon DSLR and your comment highlighted the consideration I need to look for.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 22-02-2018, 12:43 AM
TLundstrom
Registered User

TLundstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wavytone View Post
There are a LOT of cheap 80mm APO refractors to choose from:

- Skywatcher,
- Orion,
- CFF,
- Explore Scientific,
- Teleskop-Express,
- Stellavue,
- APM,
- SkyRover,
- AliExpress (if you want to go very cheap)....

The 70-120mm market is very crowded, and it will thin out, IMHO. Many are clearly from the same source in China, rebadged; the only real difference being which focusser is fitted and the label.

Notably absent are the long-term players such as LZOS and AP.
There sure are a lot of makes out there that all look very similar and offer similar features.
Apart from the Skywatcher Espirit range, I have been looking at the Stellavue and Astro-Tech astrographs. Done my head in!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-02-2018, 06:34 AM
garymck (Gary)
Registered User

garymck is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 788
I've looked through Scopey's Esprit 100 and absolutely agree with his assessment. So much so that I bought an Esprit 100. I used to also own a Tak, and I simply am unable to see any difference in the views. I am now saving for an Esprit 150 (gonna take a while ......)
cheers
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-02-2018, 10:12 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLundstrom View Post
There sure are a lot of makes out there that all look very similar and offer similar features.
Apart from the Skywatcher Espirit range, I have been looking at the Stellavue and Astro-Tech astrographs. Done my head in!!!!
Note that the Esprit is made by Skywatcher and sold only by Skywatcher. It is not rebadged and sold as any other brand.

For a full frame DSLR you will need the 100 as it has the larger imaging circle. I’ve been imaging with my Esprit 100 for 3 years now and am very happy with its performance.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-02-2018, 10:58 AM
Marke's Avatar
Marke (Mark)
Registered User

Marke is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,193
What everyone else has said it's a very good scope and Starlight instruments do a micro focuser motor for it which is not cheap but superb
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22-02-2018, 11:37 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,921
Quote:
Originally Posted by scopey View Post
I own an Espirit ed 80 and from an optical point of view can't fault it. I also own a tsa 102 Tak, and find it very hard to see the difference. Stars in the ed 80 are as good as I have seen nice and tight. I have tested it out on doubles with an eyepiece combo 5mm radian + 2 times Ultima barlow and what a beautiful airy disc, still nice and tight. Don't like the captains wheel though. My focuser is excellent. I have owned telescopes since the age of 14 I am now 74.

scopey
Hi Les or should I call you scopey?
You mention the captains wheel could you explain how ir works.
I gather you can rotate things via it but I have left my manual behind ...does it turn by itself or do you need to loosen anything.
I would like to rotate my camera but dont want to do anything until I know more.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22-02-2018, 11:57 AM
scopey's Avatar
scopey (Les)
Registered User

scopey is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Grovedale Geelong
Posts: 18
xelasnave.
The captains wheel is the unit you loosen to get the camera angle. The thread on mine is a little bit grabby, so when I am observing I loosen the star diagonal screws. So you loosen the ring that looks like a captain wheel, it's a silver color, it might be a bit tight, I loosened mine with a soft hammer. Hope this helps.
scopey
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 22-02-2018, 12:42 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,921
Thanks scopey.
Alex

Last edited by xelasnave; 22-02-2018 at 02:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 22-02-2018, 07:42 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,921
I have been thinking about hitting the captains ring with a soft hammer and I really dont feel comfortable doing that...
Does anyone have a different suggestion?
A little wd 40?
Heating it?
The Skywatcher folk went to great trouble to make a neat case to reduce shock to the scope so hitting it with a hammer seems to go against that.
Any views?
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 22-02-2018, 09:59 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
Does the 80 not have the black ridged rotator at the end of the focuser? That’s what I use on my 100 when I want to rotate the camera. The Captain’s wheel has been touched once and I realised what a daft idea it was...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 23-02-2018, 07:54 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis View Post
Does the 80 not have the black ridged rotator at the end of the focuser? That’s what I use on my 100 when I want to rotate the camera. The Captain’s wheel has been touched once and I realised what a daft idea it was...
Well I tried rotating the camera on the end you suggest but my stars went off...they became a little elongated.
The only captures I made up here only 40 at 30 seconds before the clouds came and never left...and when I cheched the stars were off...so I put the camera back to where it was...I have been under a cloud ever since.
It seemed the captains wheel was the way to go but I cant budge it.
Scopey said use a soft hammer but I would like a gentler approach if available.
Alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement