#1  
Old 10-10-2017, 09:37 PM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,059
Classic

Classic ... not Plastic

Now that's what I call Style ....

Col....
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (DSCN3629.jpg)
208.7 KB96 views
Click for full-size image (DSCN3630.jpg)
205.7 KB75 views
Click for full-size image (DSCN3631.jpg)
201.9 KB74 views

Last edited by FlashDrive; 10-10-2017 at 09:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2017, 11:25 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
For me, the Americans hold the world record for producing the world's
ugliest cars, motorbikes, trucks, and buses. To each his own I suppose.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2017, 09:16 AM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Raymo you’re right ... two fat overweight barges on wheels. However having lived in the northeast US as a kid I can understand their obsession with large cars and SUVs - the average yank is so gross as to be unable to fit in European cars from that period, and in that winter theyre heavily dressed with bulky overcoats and so on.

An Italian classic is more my thing... beautiful and fun.

Last edited by Wavytone; 11-10-2017 at 09:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2017, 10:46 AM
AstralTraveller's Avatar
AstralTraveller (David)
Registered User

AstralTraveller is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 3,766
What's the first one - the one everyone has turned their back on?

The yanks don't have a monopoly on ugly automobiles but they are run away winners (or is that waddle away?) in the XS Elephant stakes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2017, 11:55 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
It's a Buick Roadmaster Convertible from the late 1940s.
raymo

Last edited by raymo; 11-10-2017 at 11:56 PM. Reason: missing word
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:39 AM
chuckywiz (Ben)
Registered User

chuckywiz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: East Cannington
Posts: 184
Awwwww man i love em all. Tho im a car guy at heart

Love
Benno
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-10-2017, 08:16 PM
torana68's Avatar
torana68 (Roger)
Registered User

torana68 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ACT/NSW
Posts: 786
Yeah damm Yank cars all ugly.... like the Dusenberg Model J, the 1912 Stutz Bearcat, Ford model T Opera coupe, '53 Buick skylark covertable, Buick Riviera '62/'63, Chevrolet Corvette '53 I could go on and on..... we were so lucky to have things like um well I dont know whats a classic styled Australian car pre '70? something the world admires for its styling or preformance? spose we could be admiring things like the 2CV from France ?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-10-2017, 10:15 PM
OzEclipse's Avatar
OzEclipse (Joe Cali)
Registered User

OzEclipse is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Young Hilltops LGA, Australia
Posts: 1,183
Just a reminder that there are some American members on this forum. Keep the comments civil.

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-10-2017, 09:29 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Love the older American cars, lots of room and great for cruising on those long highways.

Love the Harley's as well, yes I own one as well.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14-10-2017, 11:32 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,442
I do like the first one not, to keen on the other one though.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14-10-2017, 12:34 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Large cars are fine; I've had several. Large doesn't necessarily equate
with ugly.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14-10-2017, 01:46 PM
speach's Avatar
speach (Simon)
Registered User

speach is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wonthaggi Vic
Posts: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashDrive View Post
Classic ... not Plastic

Now that's what I call Style ....

Col....
Everyone's taste is different but that's what I call ugly
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 14-10-2017, 07:17 PM
doppler's Avatar
doppler (Rick)
Registered User

doppler is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mackay
Posts: 1,656
At least all those cars have totally different styles, not like today's boring computer designed cars. Take the badges of, and you wouldn't know who the manufacturer was.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 14-10-2017, 07:20 PM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by doppler View Post
At least all those cars have totally different styles, not like today's boring computer designed cars. Take the badges of, and you wouldn't know who the manufacturer was.
Well said ...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16-10-2017, 08:27 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by doppler View Post
At least all those cars have totally different styles, not like today's boring computer designed cars. Take the badges of, and you wouldn't know who the manufacturer was.
A few years ago I was crossing the road with a friend and we stopped to admire an expensive sports car coming towards us. Still can't remember if it was an Aston , Jag or Maserati and we quickly forgot which it was in minutes and had to read the badge in the first place. They are just that unmemorable. Most marques no longer have recognisable attributes, have lost their character.

I don't like those yank tanks but they are characterful at least, no doubt and well maintained/restored cars do look great .
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 16-10-2017, 09:54 AM
AstralTraveller's Avatar
AstralTraveller (David)
Registered User

AstralTraveller is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 3,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
It's a Buick Roadmaster Convertible from the late 1940s.
raymo
That one looks moderately nice but the Caddy leaves me cold. I suppose with the 'yank tanks' we should be careful judging their practicality by today's standards. In a world of cheap fuel, empty roads and when 4 cylinder engines couldn't pull the skin of a rice custard the big V8 tank must have looked attractive. And I imagine they were a status symbol.

I do agree about characterless cars, they are a victim of convergent evolution and uninspired designers. However character and gawdy aren't the same thing. Nice clean simple lines can be most attractive.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 16-10-2017, 12:46 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
The instant recognisability of older car brands and models is echoed by
trains and planes. Everything is now forced into a narrow design envelope
by the never ending quest for aerodynamic perfection, which of course
results in lower fuel consumption, and incidentally higher speeds.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 16-10-2017, 01:05 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,890
I like functionality to rule the form.
I find it hard to see beauty when there is little relationship between form and function.
Old American cars do have a relationship between form and function.
They were of course more than mere transport filling many roles where the owner could say something about himself, usually a way of describing his success.... and the role of the car in courtship and therefore continuation of the species must be taken into account.

I think folk may have thought ..my car is big and wonderful therefore I am big and wonderful and no doubt potential partners probably approached the matter with a similar view.

And so these old cars offer beauty I suppose...but as to a car I like small and minimal weight..a lotus with 1600 cc. I find the beauty there because the function rules the form and no doubt to others these cars could appear "ugly".

I recall a restoration of a caddy..in Australia..where the owner spent some $18,000 to restore the chromework.

Anyways nice cars and nice to see someone pays for them so we can look at them.

alex
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 16-10-2017, 01:24 PM
AstralTraveller's Avatar
AstralTraveller (David)
Registered User

AstralTraveller is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 3,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
I like functionality to rule the form.
I find it hard to see beauty when there is little relationship between form and function.
Old American cars do have a relationship between form and function.
They were of course more than mere transport filling many roles where the owner could say something about himself, usually a way of describing his success.... and the role of the car in courtship and therefore continuation of the species must be taken into account.

I think folk may have thought ..my car is big and wonderful therefore I am big and wonderful and no doubt potential partners probably approached the matter with a similar view.
Role of cars in the continuation of the species?? Function ruling form? Clearly Alex is advocating bench seats - big and wonderful ones.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 16-10-2017, 01:34 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstralTraveller View Post
Role of cars in the continuation of the species?? Function ruling form? Clearly Alex is advocating bench seats - big and wonderful ones.
And upon observation we see that many of the old cars indeed had bench seats.

Are there those here that can recall when the young man would sit..rather lay toward the near side door pillar of the car and the young lady would sit right along side as close as possible... enabled by the bench seat..not something you can do today..but that was somewhat the norm.
And one arm would rise from below the field of view to grasp the wheel at 12 oclock.

alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement