#1  
Old 13-04-2012, 07:27 PM
xcoupeb
Registered User

xcoupeb is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 53
M83 gso rc8

First light with new rc8 its actually my second one, the first being sent back to retailer for replacement as it had a bad reflection problem. The new one has a slightly different secondary housing and spider vane design, maybe this was part of the problem with the first.

I managed to get 20 * 300sec of m83 with 5dmark2 with hotech field flattener on eq6 mount and it was a first for the guiding setup as well with my ed80 piggybacked with ssag.
I was a bit uncertain how this setup would go for guiding but it seemed to work very well.

Darks and flats applied and stacked in dss and processing done with photoshop cs5.

Also i have noticed that the stars in the lower right hand corner are a bit egg shaped, would this be collimation or just a bit of tilt in the imaging train??

thanks Gavin
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (m83.....jpg)
106.6 KB134 views

Last edited by xcoupeb; 13-04-2012 at 07:30 PM. Reason: additional info
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-04-2012, 10:11 PM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
Hi Gavin,

Seems the guiding is working well, and a nice result for the image. In the past for me, egg shaped stars in one corner was a collimation issue.

There's nice detail in the core, good effort.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-04-2012, 09:24 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,937
Looks pretty good. Star colour needs addressing and some selective sharpening needed in the galaxy, but overall a pleasing image.

The egg shape stars might also be tilt in one corner. Check your collimation carefully to make certain collimation is good.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-04-2012, 12:46 PM
tilbrook@rbe.ne's Avatar
tilbrook@rbe.ne (Justin Tilbrook)
JHT

tilbrook@rbe.ne is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Penwortham
Posts: 3,039
Hi Gavin,

That's a nice image, far better than Iv'e managed thus far, I'll have to give it another go.

Cheers,

Justin.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-04-2012, 01:40 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Some really great details in the galaxy. Very nicely done indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-04-2012, 03:01 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,877
I'd say tilt. I am not a collimation expert but I thought that would affect all stars not just one side of the image. What you are showing there I have seen on scopes with tilt and fixing the tilt stopped it.

As a generality DSLR images often have blown out white stars instead of coloured stars. I find it odd a 5D mk ii would do that. What ISO did you use?

Better to do shorter subs and more of them than longer subs and blowing out your stars.

What is happening with these white stars is your well capacity of the pixels is being maxed out. They are full and overflowing. So they go to max number of brightness which is white.

Same with the core of M83 which is yellowish.

I'd watch that when using DSLRs. I see it a lot and I think that is the only solution - ISO800 and 2.5 or 3 minutes instead of 5 minutes and lots of them.

You do see some DSLR images (usually a minority so this is a common problem) that retain star colours so they can do it.

CCD cameras usually have larger wells.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-04-2012, 03:44 PM
xcoupeb
Registered User

xcoupeb is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 53
Thanks everyone for your comments, Greg i did think at the time 5minutes might be a bit too long but i think i was blinded a bit by the fact that i could finally guide for longer than 3mins with round stars!

Next time will try around the 3min mark and see how its looking. The iso was 1000 am i right in thinking if i go shorter i should up the iso to 1600 perhaps? Or does this just depend on sky glow and washout?

Will also try to fix the tilt and/or collimation.
Im very pleased with this scope and hopefully a dedicated ccd wont be too far away and then i guess the learning curve goes very steep!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-04-2012, 04:02 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,877
Optimum ISO seems to be a point of debate. Often quoted that ISO1600 is a ceiling. I got my best DSLR image at ISO3200 in winter.

ISO is really just the gain of the amplifier circuit at each pixel. But I did read on another forum that the way it works its not just as simple as amping everything up including the noise.

I think the short answer would be it would depend on your camera.

5D mk ii may be best at ISO1600 and other cameras ISO800. 5D mark iii or Nikon D800 which have superior high ISO low noise performance may be better at ISO3200 or 6400. Perhaps even higher for the mark iii in jpeg. Both cameras shoot up to ISO12800 cleanly and 5D mk iii even higher in jpeg only.

Ideal exposure length would be measured by amount of histogram filled. Some say 1/3rd histogram, another said 3/4. I am not sure of this point.

I would say the point where stars still retain their colour and not beyond.
You may need to find that point by trial and error.

At least in dark skies you don't have to worry so much about sky glow.

I am about to shoot some DSLR astroimaging myself once I get a Nikon D800E but that will be a while as they aren't in the streets yet. Mainly Milky Way widefield mosaics and time lapse but also some deep sky objects to see how 36mp looks on a fast APO with perfect optics.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-04-2012, 06:29 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,006
Sharp and detailed Gavin.

Looks good.

I have also just acquired a GSO RC8. It could be another month before I can start using it so it's good to see what it's capable of.

Thanks.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-04-2012, 11:58 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,150
This is a rather classical view of this classical galaxy, nice work Gavin.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-04-2012, 06:23 PM
astronobob's Avatar
astronobob (Bob)
Casual Cosmos Capturer

astronobob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gold Coast SE QLD
Posts: 4,190
A great result on this galaxy Gavin, dig the colour and lane detail,
Cool Image !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement