#1  
Old 23-06-2009, 11:44 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,062
Don't ask me why, just because...

I know you're all dead set keen on your DSLR's and I well appreciate why, but I happen to have a curious little compact camera - a Panasonic LX3 - which runs to a 60 second exposure and has an f/2 Leica lens, and while I know well its no match for a "proper" camera I was curious to see whether it can actually capture much.

Anyway the weather gods finally obliged tonight and I took a few wide shots with this little beastie. They don't seem much until you download them as when downsized most of the stars vanish, however it did a lot better than I expected considering these are single 60 second shots - no darks, no stacking. All I did was shoot at ISO 400 (they looked noisy in camera) and drop the exposure a stop afterwards using SilkyPix which removed a lot of the noise. Tolerably.

http://web.me.com/nicholas.loveday/S...ophotos.html#0
http://web.me.com/nicholas.loveday/S...ophotos.html#1
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-06-2009, 12:12 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 16,726
As you have proved, there is no reason at all why you can't use a compact for Astrophotography.
They do a fantastic job for what they are.
I used to use my little Canon s3is for AP before I bought the 20d.
Great for widefields and using afocal for moonage. Jupiter and Saturn I used the movie function to capture .avi's and processed them in Registax.
I used a hack that allowed me to do 59sec exposures and in camera dark frame subtraction.
You might be able to do the same.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-06-2009, 08:50 PM
Jone5y (Steve)
Registered User

Jone5y is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Albion Park, NSW
Posts: 49
Nothing wrong with the LX3, my wife and I spent a little time listening to Ken Duncan at a show in Sydney on the weekend wax lyrical about the quality of the pics produced so simply with this camera. A bit of sponsored advertising, sure, but still decent praise.

I have had a lot of troubles getting our little point n shoot to focus at the low light found in astro pics, but I'm sure others here can help you out with that more than me.

Good luck!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-06-2009, 07:20 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ballarat
Posts: 10,825
Hey, that is pretty good shooting with one of those, and here I am spending heaps on the big stuff.

We;; done indeed, they actually look very good

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-06-2009, 07:38 AM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,382
the panasonic lx3 & leica equivalent(twice the cost) are excellent cameras with slr like performance, i'm not surprised at all
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Astromechanics
Advertisement
Star Adventurer
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
Celestron RASA
Advertisement
EQ8-R
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement