1: First attempt at M33
2: Dithering between images (I was told that it helps).
3: 2X2 binning on LRGB channels (got to try these things).
4: Processing LRGB in Pixinsight (tedious).
5: Used itelescope (special introductory offer).
Scope used was a Planewave 12.5 CDK located in Spain (no clouds).
Using the remote scope was no different to having it outside the bedroom window :-)
Details are:
20 X 300s Lum
10 X 300s each RBG channel
Total integration 4 hours.
No idea why some of the stars look like doughnuts.
amazing. I've been wondering what those remote access observatories were like. I have no north horizon as it is so anything past single digit positive declination is off limits... why not image then from Spain :-)
and what an image... I started counting the individual emmission nebula here and gave up. Inspiring!
Peter,
Interesting concept , processing a remote image
Good for Cloudy nights
I just saw your comment regarding "Dithering" and was quite surprised you may not have used this procedure in AP before ?
There's an old saying in AP "Dither or Die" but I don't really subscribe to that saying as many folk don't dither and still produce great images. However I can say that my dithered images are much cleaner than un dithered.Its more apparent with noisy images
Your probably aware of the reasons for dithering -
Removes Hot Pixels
Removes Fixed Pattern Noise
Reduces Dark Current ( Noise )
Helps eliminate Satellite trails and other anomalies when you Stack
And so on..........
Dithering just moves your whole frame after each sub anywhere from 0.05 to 2.0 pixels depending on your image scale, guiding program and settings in your capture software.
I started dithering after about 6 months into AP with my Canon 600D and BYEOS capture software and have dithered ever since. Some folk mention it adds to much time to your imaging session but for me it just a part of your capture and you dont really take much notice how long it adds
Now using APT with the new 2600MC camera , the dithering command after each sub seems to take less time than the old DSLR and BYEOS , maybe the dither sequence is more sophisticated in APT or my settings are lower but when you scroll through the frames for post analysis , the frame sure do move in al directions
So for me Dithering is a great benefit , costs you nothing but a little bit more time and the results show for themselves
Most capture software programs have a dithering commands which is automatically integrated with your Guiding program , mine being PHD2
That's an excellent image Peter.
I must say i have considered the itelescope for myself. I like the idea of imaging some of the Northern hemisphere options without having to go there.
Constant learning in this game.
I have seen the little check box in SGP to enable dithering, and up to this point ignored it.
Now it will stay ticked.
Thanks LIS
I love making progress, but at times it is painfully slow...
Thanks Jack
Initially, I used itelescope to try out a new scope.
In itself, remote imaging is quite a learning curve.
It can get expensive (after the intro offers), so I will use it frugally.
It pays to take note of each process and save a copy after each so you can 'retreat'.
I had to backtrack all the way to step 2 which was noise reduction.
Step 1: DBE Dynamic Background Extraction. All good.
Step 2: MLT Multi Linear Transform (noise reduction).
The artefact (doughnut) was introduced here and was very subtle (I didn't notice).
Step 3: HT Histogram Transform (now non linear).
Stretching the image made the artefact worse.
Then you go onto curves, deconvolution etc etc and the artefact gets worse again.
To find suitable settings for the MLT process (and there are hundreds), I used a small preview and zoomed in.
I could make big donuts, small donuts, donuts with rings, chocolate donuts...
And it shows. You've revealed more dust around the core, which really brings it to life. Time to go shopping for a nice frame to put it in. Well done again!
I was looking at some of the remote observatory options too, not so much because i dont want to sit in my own backyard getting annoyed with my own setup, but they do offer views of the northern hemisphere. Also some offer sample data you can download to try out, which was pretty fun to process.
That's a nice set of data so far, and it definately seems like its worth it to get a view of other parts of the sky, and avoid the weather / clouds down here.
itelescope have an introductory offer that you get about 4 hrs of imaging time for $20 AUS.
They give you a 'promo code' that gives you triple points.
Also if a big cloud happens to sit over the observatory, or you stuff up the program, you get a refund.
Not to mention rubbing shoulders with professional astronomers :-)
itelescope have an introductory offer that you get about 4 hrs of imaging time for $20 AUS.
They give you a 'promo code' that gives you triple points.
Also if a big cloud happens to sit over the observatory, or you stuff up the program, you get a refund.
Not to mention rubbing shoulders with professional astronomers :-)
Hi Peter,
This image is STUNNING!! Well done.
This remote imaging has got me intrigued. I was looking at the website, so when you sign up, you get 40 "Free" points you can access once you buy a subscription. The the starter pack is 20 points. With the triple points, you would have a total of 100 points.
Is this enough for a 4 hour image? It looks like most the scopes are like 80 or 100 points for an hour?
Certainly looks like something that could be super fun, especially to image targets which are not available to us.
Again, well done on the beautiful image especially the updated one on Astrobin!
Been a long time lurker of the forum, that's for sure. The content on here is mind blowing. Would love to try and get a little more involved once I know what I'm doing
Ill give the site a try for a bit of fun and experimentation and see how we go.
Look forward to seeing more amazing pictures from you
