Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Astrophotography and Imaging Equipment and Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 15-03-2010, 08:56 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugnsuz View Post
Getting the hard copy was part of the fun of preparing my Malin entry.
They're onto a money spinner with the $5 per digital entry I reckon!!
SBIG cameras for honorable mentions this year I hope - it's only fair Fred!!!!!
Yes, the physical process of making a good print was certainly part of the challenge (gaud, the number of my trials was embarissing, and expensive). Given the number of DSLR winners, SBIG was no advantage, as it should be .

Ill be VERY interested in how the entries are presented in print now, some serious work for a pro lab. Unless they are printed as submitted, in which case our expertise in PS is going to be a whole new world of pain for submitted image files.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 15-03-2010, 08:58 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrykgerdes View Post
I had one of those. It was good when new but after standing for a while it got to expensive to keep changing 7 cartridges. I put it in the garbage in the end. Nothing wrong except it needed a new set of cartridges.

Barry
Cartridges are only $16 each here so not too bad. Mainly have to replace the black (I print a lot of text) but the rest only about 2 - 3 times a year. Gee I wouldn't mind going through your junk .

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 15-03-2010, 09:24 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
to baldly go...

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,200
Has anyone tried out the CIS type systems instead of cartridges?
Looks like a cost effective way to print large volume (not that I need that!!)

System for the MP550 Canon unit(below) is about $170 with 100ml of each of the 5 inks included. After that the 100mlx5 refill kit is $59. Seems a helluva lot more sensible than buying the 5 individual 10ml cartridges (I've seen generic replacement kits for around $50 online)
Just refill the 5 chambers instead of all that buggering about with syringes and needles etc!

Any thoughts?

Doug
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IP4600.jpg)
62.1 KB12 views
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 15-03-2010, 09:27 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
to baldly go...

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Given the number of DSLR winners, SBIG was no advantage, as it should be .
Oops - forgot it was sponsored by Canon!!!!!!!!!
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 15-03-2010, 09:45 PM
Davelrkn's Avatar
Davelrkn
Registered User

Davelrkn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 73
I just purchased a brother MFC-5460CN on special for $159
Best of all it uses 4 cart, 3 colour 1 black all high yield 37cc each and cost $9 each .
I am very happy with the results on astro photos

Cheers
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-04-2010, 06:45 PM
peeb61's Avatar
peeb61 (Paul)
Always looking up

peeb61 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 697
I use an Epson Stylus Office TX300f, perfect everytime.
Printer, scaner, copier and fax.

Uses the DuraBrite technology, as soon as it's printed it doesn't smudge and you can even drop it in water.

Cost was $109.00 in Dicky Smith.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-04-2010, 09:27 PM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 2,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
I bought an A3 printer partly with the David Malin awards in mind, a year later, they only accept emailed images, murphys law ruled there big time ;-).
Hehehe ... I bought an Epson Stylus Pro 3800 (A2 printer) last year before the DMs!! Don't ask how much - look it up!! But oh brother, what absolutely stunning prints it makes!!!! Much better than even the pro prints produced for the DM exhibitions IMO. I'm starting to print and mount A2 sized prints on my walls now!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-04-2010, 06:58 AM
floyd_2's Avatar
floyd_2 (Dean)
Registered User

floyd_2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cecil Hills (Sydney)
Posts: 311
I would only use Canon printers for years. A few years back I decided to break away and try an Epson R1800 A3 printer when my Canon printer was killed in a lightning strike. It has turned out to be an excellent printer, and it overcame some of the limitations of its Canon brother as far as print length for panoramas went (driver limitations with the Canon). I now use roll stock for panoramas using the rear roll stock feeder on the Epson.

Ink prices are always a problem - especially with printers that use chipped cartridges, which seems to be the fashion these days.

I used to refill my old Canon A3 printer, so it was very cheap to run. When your printer is cheap to run, you don't mind printing anything (even if it turns out to be a dud for some reason). I always longed for a CIS system on the Canon, but refilling was the next best thing. When you're using chipped cartridges, it's a whole different story. I think you can get around the chips on some printers if you want to refill (I remember the canon printers setting some sort of flag in the printer that voided the warranty if you used refills / bypassed the chip).

I buy third party chipped cartridges now my Epson is out of warranty and they're just fine. This saves a bit of money when you have 8 cartridges to maintain.

As far as quality goes, the Epson R1800 has been an excellent printer with much better build quality compared to the Canon A3 printer I previously owned. I would buy an Epson again (just watch out for the price of consumables).

I've always used Ilford papers for my high quality prints and don't think that you can really go past their pearl paper for top quality prints. You just need to tweak your settings to get the most out of the paper. You can download ICC profiles from Ilford that may help depending on your printer.

Dean
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-04-2010, 04:28 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,158
Marcus,

The 3800 is a kickass printer. I have the 78xx series and love it to bits. The 36x24" it prints are astounding, on warmtone gloss paper (200 year archival expectancy).

H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Celestron Australia
Advertisement
Meade Australia
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Australia
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement