#21  
Old 29-08-2016, 06:44 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
Thanks Rick, will definitely check the maths behind it
the underlying maths can be found here - Stan's analysis includes an almost identical equation to that in the IIS thread: http://www.stanmooreastro.com/eXtreme.htm
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 29-08-2016, 09:46 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 15,452
Just in case you thought your Kodak sensor was all sexy. Look at the read noise for the freely available Sony A7r2 42.4 megapixel full frame back illuminated sensor with the analogue to digital converters on sensor.

1.8 electrons at ISO640! Yikes.

http://blog.kasson.com/?p=14035

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Australia
Advertisement
Meade Australia
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Celestron Australia
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement