ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Gibbous 99.3%
|
|
07-10-2017, 12:58 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,928
|
|
Blade Runner 2049 - no spoilers
When the original Blade Runner had its theatrical release 35 years ago,
it had mixed reviews and only took modest box office receipts.
Critics pointed out its slow pace and thin plot.
But those who praised it were in awe of the look and feel of the film.
It was modern-day film noir depicting a non-utopian future where it
is polluted, over-crowded, dangerous and nearly always raining.
Over time it became a cult classic.
The 2007 25th Anniversary "Final Cut" version saw it digitally remastered
and the much maligned voice-over narration was removed. The film's
producers had insisted on the narration to help explain the film
but Harrison Ford argued it did not belong and was quoted as saying he
intentionally did a bad job of the narration in the hope they wouldn't
use it.
For a film that has such as large cult following and which was selected
to be preserved in the Library of Congress for being "culturally,
historically, or aesthetically significant", it was going to be a hard act to
follow for any sequel.
Blade Runner 2049 is a long, deliberately slow paced film.
It is sombre, magnificent and beautiful.
Roger Deakins lighting and cinematography is breathtaking.
It will be disappointing if his work is not Oscar nominated and even more
disappointing if it does not win best cinemaphotography. I am not sure
what else one would have to do to win the accolade.
Denis Villeneuve has clearly endeavoured to direct a film that is serious
and that is designed to last the test of time like the original.
Ryan Gosling, Ana de Armas, Robin Wright, Sylvia Hoeks and Harrison Ford
provide exceptional performances.
Music soundtrack from Hans Zimmer includes echoes of the original film.
If you didn't like the original Blade Runner, then you most likely not
like the sequel.
So many films these days are disposable entertainment. Blade Runner 2049
is not but instead a film that I am confident will also pass the test of time.
It is a subtle, melancholy, thought-provoking and immersive experience.
See it on the biggest screen you can.
Last edited by gary; 10-10-2017 at 01:16 PM.
|
07-10-2017, 02:18 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
|
|
Can't wait to see it later next week, the original is one of my favorites. Been meaning to read Philip k Dicks "Do androids dream of electric sheep" for ages
|
07-10-2017, 03:21 PM
|
|
Plays well with others!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,490
|
|
Just made my son watch the Final cut in anticipation of seeing the new one soon. While I prefer the book, I remember when the movie came out and it was an experience.
|
07-10-2017, 04:59 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,275
|
|
the original was a giant of sci fi for me!
pat
|
07-10-2017, 10:55 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 896
|
|
Thought the original was one of the best movies of the times and still rate it as one of my absolute favourites.
Just got home from watching the new sequel tonight and I thoroughly enjoyed it.
I think to get the most out of it - you need to have seen the original.
There are lots of little subtleties that would not only be completely missed that add a greater appreciation of the not so obvious plot development, but also add some of the continuity that makes the sequel a logical extension.
Would love to comment on lots of aspects of the film and the plots, but dont want to be a spoiler or set any expectations.
If you loved the first one I expect you will love this one too
I can say the audience was completely captivated and you didnt want to miss a single word or piece of relevance - all the way to the very end.
The only shame is - it took them so . . . . long to release a sequel !
On the balance of probabilities I simply can't wait another 35 years for No. 3.
Last edited by rally; 08-10-2017 at 11:22 AM.
|
08-10-2017, 12:23 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,928
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rally
I can say the audience was completely captivated and you didnt want to miss a single word or piece of relevance - all the way to the very end.
|
Hi Rally,
That's interesting.
I can say that at the 9pm session I was at, the audience was absolutely silent.
Rare for the movies these days.
So much so that one grew conscious of how captivated they were, hanging
off every word.
Best regards
Gary
|
08-10-2017, 11:18 AM
|
|
ze frogginator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
|
|
Looking forward to go seeing this one.
|
08-10-2017, 05:51 PM
|
|
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
Excellent if a little loud with too much 'horn' play trying to add to the drama. I'll get the BluRay when it comes out so I can go back and analyse some of the trickier bits.
Supposedly answers 'all' the questions left hanging from the first but I wonder if there is a sequel to this one day.. 'The rise of the Replicants' maybe.
|
08-10-2017, 06:19 PM
|
|
IIS Member #671
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
|
|
No Vangelis? Boo!
Can’t wait to see it!
H
|
08-10-2017, 07:00 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,928
|
|
A couple of weeks ago, Warner Brothers also released three short prequels
to correspond with the release of the film.
These were commissioned by Warner Brothers and Denis Villeneuve
and are created by other filmmakers.
BLADE RUNNER 2049 - "Black Out 2022" Anime Short
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrZk9sSgRyQ
BLADE RUNNER 2049 - "2036: Nexus Dawn" Short
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgsS3nhRRzQ
BLADE RUNNER 2049 - "2048: Nowhere to Run" Short
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZ9Os8cP_gg
Though they are prequels, I'd suggest to watch them after you have seen
Blade Runner 2049.
Last edited by gary; 08-10-2017 at 07:15 PM.
|
08-10-2017, 07:47 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,838
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane
No Vangelis? Boo!
Can’t wait to see it!
H
|
Yeh,
He is still with us, so that would have been perfect. Actually most of the originals too. Daryl Hannah really was a gymnast but they did use a stand-in. However Sean Young, Rutger Hauer, etc are different now. Um.
The atmospherics of the film were just awesome.
Cheers
|
09-10-2017, 11:16 AM
|
|
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
It rained .... a lot !
|
10-10-2017, 12:19 PM
|
|
Plays well with others!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,490
|
|
Saw it today and really enjoyed it. In an aside the power went out in the theater with about 7 minutes to go...we waited for power to be restored to see the end.
When the film stopped and the emergency lights turned on, the audience sat in stunned silence for a few minutes trying to figure out if that was the end or not.
|
10-10-2017, 01:23 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,928
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wavelandscott
Saw it today and really enjoyed it. In an aside the power went out in the theater with about 7 minutes to go...we waited for power to be restored to see the end.
When the film stopped and the emergency lights turned on, the audience sat in stunned silence for a few minutes trying to figure out if that was the end or not.
|
Hi Scott,
EMP?
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrZk9sSgRyQ
I went back to the cinema & viewed it a second time last night.
A master class in film making.
|
10-10-2017, 02:11 PM
|
|
Plays well with others!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,490
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gary
|
I have not watched the shorts yet but I had not considered an EMP...a strongish thunder storm came through so I assume that was the cause but now 8 will double check.
Either way, the show was enjoyable to me.
|
10-10-2017, 03:26 PM
|
|
ze frogginator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
|
|
Going to see it tonight.
Enjoyed it. Lots of little bits thrown in reminiscent of the first one. Clever story and use of colors and lights. Great imagery. Was I the only one waiting for the score to hit those high notes in the fly over scenes?
Last edited by multiweb; 11-10-2017 at 07:50 AM.
|
11-10-2017, 12:44 PM
|
|
Not even a speck of dust
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
|
|
Good to see the response is positive. I've avoided looking into it, just another cash cow remake i figured. Will have to wait for bluray release and give it a try, i hope there are six releases before we get the one to watch.
|
12-10-2017, 01:56 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 355
|
|
It is sounding like a must see!
|
12-10-2017, 03:31 PM
|
|
IIS Member #671
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
|
|
It's not a remake -- it's a continuation of the story.
H
Quote:
Originally Posted by sil
Good to see the response is positive. I've avoided looking into it, just another cash cow remake i figured. Will have to wait for bluray release and give it a try, i hope there are six releases before we get the one to watch.
|
|
13-10-2017, 02:20 PM
|
|
Not even a speck of dust
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane
It's not a remake -- it's a continuation of the story.
H
|
LOL, WHICH story? ... glad I only have one bluray version instead of the six dvd versions I also have. just lent my bluray to a workmate, the youngster has never seen bladerunner which is hard for me to get my head around
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:43 AM.
|
|