Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-03-2017, 11:00 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
GSO 10" RC -- truss or tube?

Hi team,

I'm in the process of building my observatory (Absco pool pump cover shed thing) which is about 1.5m x 1.5m x (1.4m tall on the high side, down to 1.2m tall on the low side (skillion roof)).

I'm contemplating buying a GSO 10" carbon fibre RC.

Looking for your opinions re: truss or tube for observatory housing. There's about $500 between them, which is not inconsiderable when it comes to having to spend another $1,500 or so on a decent focuser (I'd love an Atlas, but, I can't stretch the budget that far at this point in time, so, a Feathertouch system will do).

It'll be mounted on a Losmandy G-11 on a short concrete pier.

A penny for your thoughts, re: advantages/disadvantages of both?

Thanks!

H
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-03-2017, 11:02 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,982
Just from some things I'd read a while back I would suggest the truss over the tube, it sounded like it was better mechanically. The trusses seemed to be stiffer and hold collimation better.

Having never seen either of them in person, I'm just going by what I remember reading from others
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-03-2017, 11:13 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Hey Colin,

Cheers for that. Wow, I didn't realise trusses were sturdier? That's good feedback

H

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
Just from some things I'd read a while back I would suggest the truss over the tube, it sounded like it was better mechanically. The trusses seemed to be stiffer and hold collimation better.

Having never seen either of them in person, I'm just going by what I remember reading from others
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-03-2017, 11:52 AM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
If you do go with a truss setup make sure you have a decent shroud that blocks off outside light.
Not so much for capturing your subs at night, but you do not want any light penetration when doing flats.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-03-2017, 12:03 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Excellent suggestion, Bill.

I was going to set up a flat panel on one of the walls in the observatory to make it easier, but, if I'm doing dusk/dawn flats, the shroud would be indispensable.

Ta.

H
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-03-2017, 12:21 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,048
Having owned an RC tube version i can tell you one big difference which will be important later on, with the tube version, cleaning the primary is complicated, with the truss it is easy. The truss is also fractionally lighter out of the box, 300gms. Regarding the focuser, the linear rail focuser is much stiffer than the old models, i would try it before you upgrade, it may not need replacement. I would suggest the optional focuser collimation ring, to enable precise alignment of the focuser with the secondary centre spot. If you do buy a replacement focuser make sure it can be collimated. Buy a TAK Collimation Scope, you will need it. Astrozap has good shrouds which are light tight, as well as front screw mounted light shields (which can be important if your scope sticks up above the observatory walls). Have a look at the Kendrick secondary heaters for the RCs, you will need one. Kendrick supplies thin copper tape that can be applied to the secondary vanes to avoid using wires, which can make one vane thicker than another.
Have fun.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-03-2017, 09:12 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Thank you for the sage advice, Glen. All points noted to take into consideration!

Thanks again, all.

H
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-03-2017, 10:04 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,896
Thermal tube currents make closed tubes for long focal length scopes very non optimum. I had a closed tube 12.5 inch RCOS and could not get super sharp images out of it.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-03-2017, 11:21 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Not here to help with your RC, but H, you know call me if the FSQ is up for sale


I feel a connection to that scope
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-03-2017, 01:46 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
hahaha, I'm keeping it.

I could lend it out, though?

H
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-03-2017, 02:39 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,064
If you got the tube version of the RC, you could probably put the FSQ on top of it as well. (Ok, not sure of the weight limits, etc).

However, I've got the CF tube version and while I like it, if I could have got the truss version at the time I would have done so - for the reasons previously mentioned, but also because it would look cooler.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-03-2017, 05:10 PM
spiezzy
Registered User

spiezzy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Helensburgh NSW
Posts: 367
hi there H
I have a Carbon Fibre Truss F4 10" Newt and the great thing I find is that it holds collimation all night due to the non thermal expansion and contraction it is also mounted on a G11 and the weight difference is quite big between a solid tube version I would not hesitate in recommending the truss version as Bill mentioned you need a light shroud I go mine from Teleskope Express fitted like a glove
hope this helps
cheers Pete
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement