#1  
Old 12-08-2014, 11:58 AM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,119
Filter for full spectrum modded DSLR

Appreciate some input from experienced members on this.
I am currently using a Astronomik CLS filter for my modded DSLR (40D). I have just done a full spectrum mod of a 1100D (removing both the UV/IR filter and the "blue" filter in front of the sensor).
I am told that I will need a L filter to avoid star bloat when using refractors.
Looking at the filter graphs from Astronomik, two things are apparent
1. CLS filter cuts off below 440nm and again between 540-630nm (sodium and mercury for light pollution).
2. L filter cuts off below 380nm, allowing more data bewteen 380-440nm, but also allow for light pollution between 540-630nm.
So I have the following questions
1. What data can I obtain in the 380-440nm range?
2. Is that data a worthwhile trade off for the increased light pollution in the 540-630nm range?
3. Will CLS reduce star bloat like the L filter on a refractor?
I shoot from my suburban backyard, cannot see street lights directly as they are blocked by my house, but they are only 30 meters away (they emit low power white light, not LED and not the orange glow lights like you have on main streets, although those orange lights are a just hundred meters up the road).
Thanks!
Bo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (astronomik-l-uv-ir_trans.png)
62.3 KB12 views
Click for full-size image (astronomik_cls_trans.png)
70.3 KB10 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2014, 12:10 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,125
There's two versions of the CLS. You either need the CLS CCD version, or if you already have a standard CLS just add the L filter or other UV / IR blocker.

As for the 540-630nm range, there's often a lot of comet emissions in that part of the spectrum, if you're into comets.

I find the CLS rather heavy handed for mild LP. You might be better off with a milder filter like Baader Moon and Skyglow, Idas LPS or similar broadband filter.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2014, 01:11 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,119
Thanks Kevin,
I have the CLS EOS clip in filter (not the CLS CCD). If I do add a L filter in front of it, the CLS filter will cut off the spectrum bypassed by the L filter, so it defeat the purpose IMO (or is this purely to get rid of star bloat?)
Good point about comets and broadband filters too.
Thanks
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2014, 01:53 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Spectroscopy Wizard

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St Leonards, Vic
Posts: 6,962
Bo,
The L filter (or a good UV-IR cut filter) reduces the "bloat" in lens systems by suppressing the usual out of focus wavelengths - the UV (<400nm) and the NIR (>700nm).

In my modded 1000D I just use a clear clip in filter to maintain the focus with standard lenses and add separate filters up stream when needed.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Meade Australia
Advertisement
Celestron Australia
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Australia
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement