And people say that the large CO of an RC makes it a poor planetary scope
I was looking at Mars 20 minutes ago and it didn’t look anywhere near as nice as your image. No ice caps and just detailness from the dust.
And people say that the large CO of an RC makes it a poor planetary scope
I was looking at Mars 20 minutes ago and it didn’t look anywhere near as nice as your image. No ice caps and just detailness from the dust.
Just lacks a bit of contrast when looking thru it that's all imho. I could see the polar caps quite well but that's all now....damn dust. Crazy to think we are complaining about the weather on another planet lol
Your images are amazing, and i was thinking about an RC as one of options for planetary imaging [not visual], but all keep pushing me to SCT only, not even a dob or Newtonian, and i can't afford over $4000 SCT which also needs another mount costly.
Your images are amazing, and i was thinking about an RC as one of options for planetary imaging [not visual], but all keep pushing me to SCT only, not even a dob or Newtonian, and i can't afford over $4000 SCT which also needs another mount costly.
I wouldnt get it just for planets but there is no reason you cant use it and you can use a Dob with tracking or a Newt which needs a bigger barlow thats all . Just get what you will use the most and start small