Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-10-2019, 06:24 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,704
Miranda…maybe?

Tuesday night found me outside trying to record the elusive Miranda, a 16.5 mag satellite of Uranus, never appearing more than 9 arc secs from the glare of the planet’s mag 5.67 disc.

On the computer screen it was easy to distinguish the 4 brighter Uranian satellites; Ariel, Umbriel, Titania and Oberon, but Miranda was nowhere to be seen, hidden in the glare.

I took a series of 1 sec, 2 sec, 5 sec, 10 sec and 30 sec images so that I could later search for Miranda and the best series appeared to be the 60 x 10 sec frames, so I processed them in AS!3 and as luck would have it, a Miranda candidate appeared, frustratingly located in one of the diffraction spikes of the ‘scopes 4 vane spider.

After a little teasing out of the data, I did find a faint collection of photons that coincided with the plotted position of Miranda as displayed in SkyTools 4. I overlayed a Screen Capture from ST4 to show the plotted position.

I probably would not bet the house on this result, but it is my best effort to date.

Name Mag PA° Sep"
Ariel 14.3 181.2 13.8
Umbriel 15.0 351.0 19.5
Titania 13.9 182.7 31.4
Oberon 14.1 340.5 42.0
Miranda 16.5 190.5 9.1

At the time of these observations, the planet Uranus (51,118 km dia.) was some 18.8 AU from the Earth with a Sun Distance of 19.8 AU.

Tak Mewlon 210
Tak x1,6 Extender
ASI1600MM Pro Cooled.

Cheers

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Uranus Moons M210 1x6 ASI1600 10 secs Crop 1024.jpg)
143.2 KB77 views
Click for full-size image (Uranus Moons M210 1x6 ASI1600 10 secs ST4 Crop 1024.jpg)
145.1 KB68 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-10-2019, 06:34 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,033
Your title drew me in....And here I thought Miranda was at the edge of the Burnham quadrant, embedded deep into Reaver space, and is the sole planet of the protostar Burnham.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-10-2019, 06:40 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
I’m with Glen here, I was on a completely different line of thought haha

Fantastic capture though! All you need now is an 8” APO to get rid of that pesky diffraction spike haha
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-10-2019, 09:10 PM
John Hothersall's Avatar
John Hothersall
Registered User

John Hothersall is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thornlands, Brisbane.
Posts: 1,346
I think your house is safe as you definitely got Miranda. You need good seeing to get more photons on target, I thought seeing was a bit avg according to predictions.

John.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-10-2019, 06:40 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Awesome catch Dennis. Pretty extreme imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-10-2019, 09:34 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
Your title drew me in....And here I thought Miranda was at the edge of the Burnham quadrant, embedded deep into Reaver space, and is the sole planet of the protostar Burnham.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
I’m with Glen here, I was on a completely different line of thought haha

Fantastic capture though! All you need now is an 8” APO to get rid of that pesky diffraction spike haha
Thanks Glen and Colin, it seems a live a somewhat sheltered life as I had to Google the topic to understand the alternate context.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-10-2019, 09:38 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hothersall View Post
I think your house is safe as you definitely got Miranda. You need good seeing to get more photons on target, I thought seeing was a bit avg according to predictions.

John.
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Awesome catch Dennis. Pretty extreme imaging.
Thanks John and Marc, I appreciate your comments.

@John - most times I try to see if Miranda is lurking in my image before I investigate via a star chart, as on a couple of occasions, the diffraction patterns around the object have produced spurious or transitory intensity variations that could be mistaken for a real object.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-10-2019, 07:16 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,704
Miranda for 24th Oct.

Here is a screen capture from SkyTools 4 Imaging, for Uranus and the 5 brighter moons as viewed from Brisbane tonight, 24th Oct 2019 at approx. 11:55pm.

The separation between Miranda and Uranus is approx. 9 arc secs which is approaching maximum.

I'll give it another go to see if I can position Miranda away from my spider's diffraction spikes.

Cheers

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Miranda 24 Oct 2355.jpg)
56.8 KB27 views
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24-10-2019, 11:16 PM
gary
Registered User

gary is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,914
Hi Dennis,

That's extremely impressive! Well done!

Sky & Telescope Moons of Uranus Observing Tool :-
https://www.skyandtelescope.com/obse...ons-ofuranus/#
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-10-2019, 10:12 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by gary View Post
Hi Dennis,

That's extremely impressive! Well done!

Sky & Telescope Moons of Uranus Observing Tool :-
https://www.skyandtelescope.com/obse...ons-ofuranus/#

Thanks Gary, I appreciate your comments.

Thanks for the link to the S&T Tool, it looks to be a good tool to grab a quick view to see when the 5 brightest moons are at greatest elongation.

Very impressive image by Ed Grafton for 2002 using an ST-5...although the C14 would have helped.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement