#1  
Old 06-10-2008, 08:36 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
Canon EF400mm f/5.6 USM

today l was offered one of these and compared to new prices it is a bargain, does anyone have any comments on this lens astro pic wise.
l just bought a 135mm f/2 but may fork out for this if the comments are positive. thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2008, 09:06 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,430
Mick, they are a top Super Tele Lens, great for sports and stuff like that, I was actually eying off one the other day, very popular.

This what Canon has to say.


Super Telephoto Lenses

This high-performance lens was designed with portability and handling ease in mind. One super UD-glass element, whose characteristics are similar to fluorite, and one UD-glass element result in sharp pictures from corner-to-corner.

If you find another at a good price please let me know

The only thing is that they will not auto focus with either the 1.4 or 2.0 extenders attached.

leon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2008, 09:47 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Tunnel Vision

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,801
Fantastic lens. Sharp as hell, very fast to focus, makes a very nice wide field APO for deep sky imaging.. Great for sports & wildlife and many other uses... and even at the retail price, cheap for what it is....

If you've been offered a bargain, Take it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2008, 10:01 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,704
I assume it is the 400mm F5.6 L lens? I purchased one mainly for bird in flight photography and it has performed exceptionally well. I can shoot wide open at F5.6 and the lens delivers very sharp results with no evidence of CA.

This is a specialist lens for wildlife and sports photography although the relatively slow aperture of F5.6 does require reasonable light to keep the shutter speed up to avoid camera shake due to the extreme magnification of the lens.

This is a definite keeper and remarkably light weight and easy to handle although I mostly use a tripod and a gimbal mount just to minimise the potential for blurry shots. It’s not really a walk about lens for general use, although you can walk about with it as it is so lightweight for a 400mm.

I took some 30 second and 3 minute shots of the HST passing close to Jupiter and did notice some lens flare probably caused by the bright Jupiter in the frame. Using the Canon 40D with Remote Live View makes this lens easy to focus. A Bahtinov Mask would make it even easier.

If you do a search in the Forum on Canon 400mm you should find some of my bird in flight shots and a few sample astro shots.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:24 PM
paul11
Registered User

paul11 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 9
This may help,this was taken with the 400 5.6 and a 2x TC at 800mm,,,,Paul.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Moon-new-mk3-%2B2x-tc_filtered.jpg)
120.2 KB37 views
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2008, 12:18 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
i'll go for the 400mm F2.8 L version mick instead of the F5.6L for astro use. F5.6 is relatively slow for deep sky stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2008, 12:35 AM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by EzyStyles View Post
i'll go for the 400mm F2.8 L version mick instead of the F5.6L for astro use. F5.6 is relatively slow for deep sky stuff.
http://www.tscamerahouse.com.au/cano...ens-p-442.html

$10,999 !!! , too pricey for me .

cf : http://www.tscamerahouse.com.au/cano...ens-p-454.html

$1,929 is more affordable (even if is the inflated Aussie price from CameraHouse , ... I'd never buy one from them .... BTW.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2008, 12:39 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Tunnel Vision

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,801
$1499 from d-d-photographics...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-10-2008, 12:42 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 25,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by EzyStyles View Post
i'll go for the 400mm F2.8 L version mick instead of the F5.6L for astro use. F5.6 is relatively slow for deep sky stuff.
mmm but there's a big diff in price between the 400 f2.8 and 400 f5.6.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-10-2008, 07:39 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,932
You guys must be loaded with $$$...
I do not even DARE to think about new Canon lenses....
Would it not be much more cost effective to consider astrograph? Unless of course, it is supposed to be used for terrestial photography (where all those nice things like AF, IS etc count).

Last edited by bojan; 08-10-2008 at 08:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-10-2008, 06:11 PM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
wowsers, i thought might be slightly moree. that is a huge gap.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-10-2008, 06:36 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Tunnel Vision

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,801
If it were me I'd go an astrograph... what with already having a 300mm F/2.8, however yes, if you wanted terrestrial photos from an astrograph you'd want some pretty fast fingers to focus it/ point it and hold it steady


Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
You guys must be loaded with $$$...
I do not even DARE to think about new Canon lenses....
Would it not be much more cost effective to consider astrograph? Unless of course, it is supposed to be used for terrestial photography (where all those nice things like AF, IS etc count).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement