Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-06-2018, 12:13 PM
Stefan Buda
Registered User

Stefan Buda is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 832
Commerial astro gear workmaship

I myself don't use any commercially made telescopes, but whenever I do some work on one, I am shocked by the poor workmanship I see.

Yesterday I received a Meade secondary mirror for recoating and I'm appalled by the attitude that went into making it.


The carrier aluminium disc has been sliced with a circular saw without any further machining, other than drilling and tapping the mounting holes, and it's not even anodised for corrosion protection.

The mirror has been glued on eccentrically by about a millimetre and it also has a wedge error of about a millimetre. Shocking piece of rubbish.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (MeadeSec1.JPG)
94.1 KB123 views
Click for full-size image (MeadeSec2.JPG)
150.8 KB118 views
Click for full-size image (MeadeSec3.JPG)
98.6 KB117 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-06-2018, 12:19 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
That's why they'll keep you in business.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-06-2018, 12:59 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
That's why they'll keep you in business.
+1
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-06-2018, 02:07 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,106
I have a Coronado SM90 filter that was made by Coronado, prior to Meade acquiring the company and sending production to Mexico....suffice to say it makes my Meade manufactured SM90 look sick....so I hear what you are saying.

That said, manufacturers such as Astro-Physics and Alluna do a superlative job and it would be very unfair to tar them with the same brush.

Like most things in life.....you get what you pay for.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-06-2018, 02:21 PM
Lognic04's Avatar
Lognic04 (Logan)
Registered User

Lognic04 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 889
I wonder what my tak would look like from your perspective?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-06-2018, 02:53 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
Totally agree. The best mid range kit I ever saw was a G11... Machining is a work of art. Wont touch low range stuff at all now. Just not worth the hassle. My Mantra: "Either pay for quality or build it yourself...."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-06-2018, 03:34 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_draco View Post
... " ... or build it yourself...."

Because if I build it myself, I will know who is to blame if it doesn't work
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-06-2018, 03:36 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,048
Why would Meade, or any high output telescope business, deliver build quality that would last a lifetime? It only has to be good enough to do the job over a reasonable time frame (longer than the warranty period). This is the age of throw away appliances, tools, cars, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-06-2018, 03:47 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,940
When I was just out of uni and starting my engineering career in R&D, there was a story about Siemens RF engineer who got himself fired after years of service because his high-power transmitter tubes never failed.. so Siemens was losing money on those tubes.

Most likely this story was just an anecdote.. but still illustrative one.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-06-2018, 04:00 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Bojan
Just google the "Phoebus cartel"


ie probably it wasnt an anecdote


Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-06-2018, 07:06 PM
Stefan Buda
Registered User

Stefan Buda is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
That's why they'll keep you in business.
Actually I don't like fixing other people's creations. I like to be a maker not a fixer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
+1
Colin, I've done your adaptor mod. You can collect it whenever it suits you.
By the way, what make is it. I'm curious because it looks were nice, but when I clocked up the dovetail side, the other one had quite a bad trefoil distortion and runout.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I have a Coronado SM90 filter that was made by Coronado, prior to Meade acquiring the company and sending production to Mexico....suffice to say it makes my Meade manufactured SM90 look sick....so I hear what you are saying.

That said, manufacturers such as Astro-Physics and Alluna do a superlative job and it would be very unfair to tar them with the same brush.

Like most things in life.....you get what you pay for.
You may be right, as I never had anything to do with those brands.
However, I clocked up a Takahashi alignment telescope on the lathe, not long ago, and half of the assembly had a surprising amount of runout relative to the rest. Maybe it was a counterfeit one.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-06-2018, 07:18 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,106
Many, many moons ago I was an associate editor for the now defunct Sky and Space magazine. A project that I enjoyed was an official tour of the Meade and Celestron factories in Irvine and Torrance respectively.

The landscape has changed, with my understanding that both companies are Chinese owned, with Celestron now made in China, Meade made in Mexico (and possibly China) and there is a rumour that Synta (aka Celestron) actually own Sunny Optical Co (aka Meade) but don’t like to talk about it due an anti-trust ruling in the USA forbidding their merger.

Anyway, back in the day, Celestron figured their secondaries to get an acceptable optical null. Meade used the mix and match approach (eg mate a “hot”secondary to a “cool” primary) to manufacture optics that were rarely perfect, but rarely really bad....they fell with an “acceptable” zone of quality. I found that Celestron optics were not as smooth, but they invariably had more accurate figures than Meade.

As to what you get with mass produced optics today, well....I suspect with rough sawn metal components, only your satisfaction is now guaranteed
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-06-2018, 07:50 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,280
Pic 1: Original GSO 12" spider assembly....
Note the asymmetry.

2nd pic: my secondary with adjustable feeler gauge vanes.

3rd pic: fuzzy adjacent Miaplacidus...

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s....php?t=117302&

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (original_1.jpg)
36.4 KB73 views
Click for full-size image (new_5.jpg)
54.9 KB72 views
Click for full-size image (16feb_miaplacidus.jpg)
164.3 KB69 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement