#1  
Old 13-02-2019, 07:35 PM
DarkArts
Registered User

DarkArts is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 606
Opportunity Lost

So it looks like, barring a miracle, Mars rover Opportunity will soon be declared lost after suffering a massive Mars dust storm eight months ago, the same storm that affected views of Mars during the 2018 opposition.

NASA about to pull plug on Mars rover Opportunity after it was silenced by immense dust storm

Still, 15 years on Mars is a pretty amazing achievement for a "career" (primary mission) that was supposed to last three months. I guess in "dog" years, Opportunity was 500+ years old at the close ...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-02-2019, 07:56 PM
Multiverse (Grant)
Registered User

Multiverse is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Wollongong (Woonona) NSW
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkArts View Post
So it looks like, barring a miracle, Mars rover Opportunity will soon be declared lost after suffering a massive Mars dust storm eight months ago, the same storm that affected views of Mars during the 2018 opposition.

NASA about to pull plug on Mars rover Opportunity after it was silenced by immense dust storm

Still, 15 years on Mars is a pretty amazing achievement for a "career" (primary mission) that was supposed to last three months. I guess in "dog" years, Opportunity was 500+ years old at the close ...
Only a three month mission? That surprises me - would have thought with the huge investment costs of construction & launch it would be designed for a longer life.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-02-2019, 08:01 PM
DarkArts
Registered User

DarkArts is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 606
90 days ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by https://www.space.com/18289-opportunity-rover.html
Opportunity is a rover that has been working on Mars since January 2004. Originally intended to last 90 days, the machine crawled more than the distance of a marathon (26.2 miles, or 42.1 kilometers) between its landing day and when the rover was last heard from on Mars, on June 10, 2018. As of that time the odometer on Opportunity read 28.06 miles (45.16 km).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-02-2019, 09:15 PM
AndyG's Avatar
AndyG (Andy)
No. I am a meat popsicle.

AndyG is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Townsville
Posts: 598
I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (spirit.jpg)
114.8 KB81 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-02-2019, 09:21 AM
Shano592's Avatar
Shano592 (Shane)
#6363

Shano592 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 1,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Multiverse View Post
Only a three month mission? That surprises me - would have thought with the huge investment costs of construction & launch it would be designed for a longer life.
The Hubble Telescope was the same. It was never meant to still be running after 29 years. I think JWT was supposed to replace it at least 5 years ago, but Hubble's original plan was for no more than about 10 years, I think.

Oh, if only they could build such wild underestimations into motor vehicles, or home appliances...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-02-2019, 06:17 PM
DarkArts
Registered User

DarkArts is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shano592 View Post
Oh, if only they could build such wild underestimations into motor vehicles, or home appliances...
Agreed! Wouldn't that be nice for a change. Still, in my case, I'm running a laptop and a car both from 2001 ... so some things last.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-02-2019, 08:30 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,430
A total wast of money, spend it on the poor and homeless.

Mars is totally inhabitable so why would some one spend so much money on a desolate dry dusty piece of rock, it really is beyond me

It is just stupid that anyone here on this forum agrees with this idea of planting a human on this rock.

The billions spent could feed millions of starving people it is about time some one got it right

And i really don't care if that stupid rover they sent up there died, so would we all

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-02-2019, 09:32 PM
AndyG's Avatar
AndyG (Andy)
No. I am a meat popsicle.

AndyG is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Townsville
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
A total wast of money, spend it on the poor and homeless.

...
And i really don't care if that stupid rover they sent up there died, so would we all

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-02-2019, 06:19 PM
DarkArts
Registered User

DarkArts is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
It is just stupid that anyone here on this forum agrees with this idea of planting a human on this rock.
This thread has nothing to do with human space exploration.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-02-2019, 06:39 PM
Multiverse (Grant)
Registered User

Multiverse is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Wollongong (Woonona) NSW
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
A total wast of money, spend it on the poor and homeless.

Mars is totally inhabitable so why would some one spend so much money on a desolate dry dusty piece of rock, it really is beyond me

It is just stupid that anyone here on this forum agrees with this idea of planting a human on this rock.

The billions spent could feed millions of starving people it is about time some one got it right

And i really don't care if that stupid rover they sent up there died, so would we all

Leon
Mmm, so going by that thinking would you also say the moon landings were a waste of money?! What about all the spin offs from these investments? I respect your view but find it surprising for an astronomer.
There will always be disadvantaged/poor people on earth so I guess we will never get a chance to space travel then?
We explore because we are curious (what a waste of our advanced civilization if we never explore). Gaining knowledge from these endeavours is priceless.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16-02-2019, 12:33 AM
StuTodd
Registered User

StuTodd is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 353
Mars has never failed to disappoint, especially visually.

And is probably why we'll find some bloody good solar system science there one day.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-02-2019, 02:45 AM
Ukastronomer (Jeremy)
Feel free to edit my imag

Ukastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Llandysul, WALES, UK
Posts: 1,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
A total wast of money, spend it on the poor and homeless.

Mars is totally inhabitable so why would some one spend so much money on a desolate dry dusty piece of rock, it really is beyond me

It is just stupid that anyone here on this forum agrees with this idea of planting a human on this rock.

The billions spent could feed millions of starving people it is about time some one got it right

And i really don't care if that stupid rover they sent up there died, so would we all

Leon

That old rubbish, the money would NOT be spent feeding people and when we have overpopulated to the point when we cant feed all the population we have and no space to have more, do you condone forced sterilisation
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16-02-2019, 11:16 AM
redbeard's Avatar
redbeard (Damien)
Registered User

redbeard is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyG View Post
I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry...
I laughed, great cartoon!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement