It's a wee ripper Tim, some lovely inner details, nicely done ...hmmm?..I haven't done a PN for a while
Mike
Thanks Mike,
Yes, it's small. I remember that advert fondly!
Cheers,
Tim
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus
Not seen that one before. Wonderfully delicate, intricate innards. Beautifully done.
Thanks M+T!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01
The universe continues to provide unique and interesting objects and this one is no exception, be interesting to see this with more FL - well done!
Thanks Andy,
Yes, I agree with your comment about the universe!... I saw the news report today about the impossible black hole collision!
Cheers,
Tim
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
That's pretty cool Tim. You've got some really good details there. What FL are you at?
Thanks very much Marc,
FL is 4750mm.
Perhaps these small objects are sometimes better imaged with a webcam like planetary imaging, but this one is quite faint - not much signal with RGB at all.
Cheers,
Tim
Gotta love PNs and the small stuff most imagers ignore .
I personally find PNs fascinating - far more interesting than cloud expanses. I’m still hunting a particular extender so I can at least image them at f/8 rather than my usual rather optimistic f/5.3
FL is 4750mm.
Perhaps these small objects are sometimes better imaged with a webcam like planetary imaging, but this one is quite faint - not much signal with RGB at all
Your stars are incredibly tight and your field looks great. Not sure if you'd benefit from lucky imaging. Not on that particular shot anyway. I have tried a webcam on small things like the trap, bug nebula and other smal blighters and it seems beneficial on bits that are relatively bright. As you say it would be challenging on this. I'm still to experiment.