#1  
Old 14-02-2010, 08:53 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 7,852
OSC v DSLR

I've not the time to go into mono/filter imaging nor for that matter the patience

is there any significant gain buying a OSC CCD over a modified DSLR



if answered before please direct me
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-02-2010, 09:00 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
I've not the time to go into mono/filter imaging nor for that matter the patience

is there any significant gain buying a OSC CCD over a modified DSLR



if answered before please direct me
It has been asked before:
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=35971
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=49803
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=47309

It's the cooling and much simpler long exposure that make the difference.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-02-2010, 09:04 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
The biggest gains in buying a dedicated cCD is The removal of the filter in front of the CCD allowing higher sensitivity and easier use of other filters.
The second is cooling, this is a big one in a relatively hot climate.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-02-2010, 10:13 PM
toryglen-boy's Avatar
toryglen-boy (Duncan)
Scotland to Australia

toryglen-boy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,645
Dont forget 16bt colour, as opposed to 12bt from DSLR (maybe 14bt in better cameras?)

make such a difference.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-02-2010, 10:41 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Tunnel Vision

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,801
Duncan - Its not so much 16bit colour, but 16bit depth. Its a measurement of dynamic range, indicating that the sensor is capable of discerning 65536 individual, discrete shades of grey. Whether its an OSC camera or a monochrome camera, this measurement indicates how many shades of grey the camera can capture.. The difference is that an OSC CCD splits the pixels into groupings of 4, each pixel in the grouping has a tiny little filter over it that cuts out all light except the relevant information. in the QHY8 it is R G G B, pixel 1 accepts only red light, pixels 2 and 3 accept green light, pixel 4 accepts blue light. again, the pixels are only seeing 65535 shades of grey, but the filter in front of the pixels allows the camera to capture RGB data in one shot. Hence, OSC. Software is then used to debayer the grey information to create a colour image from a sensor that only detects shades of grey..

Although its already summed up,

Cooling and inherent noise levels as a result of cooling
Dramatically improved dynamic range
Increased sensitivity to all the important spectra of light.

There is no ifs, whats or buts about it... An OSC CCD imaging camera will produce better images of the night sky than even a cooled, UV/IR modified DSLR.. Not to mention that something like the QHY8 is not much more expensive than the standard consumer level DSLR like the 50D, once you pay to have the DSLR UV/IR modified, the price difference is all but gone... Then weigh up the differences between a modded DSLR and an OSC CCD..

Without a doubt, the thing that speaks the loudest (pardon the pun..) is noise... A QHY8 or any other astro camera with the Sony ICX-453 sensor has such a low dark current that dark frames are completely unnecessary even when taking 20 to 30 minute frames.. Lets see you get noise free 30 minute subs from ANY DSLR, even the most expensive DSLR's like the Canon 1D mk III / 1D mk IV and the Nikon D3Xs / D700...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-02-2010, 12:48 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 7,852
Thanks guys for the feedback and Alex for the detailed summary
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-02-2010, 06:10 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Without a doubt, the thing that speaks the loudest (pardon the pun..) is noise... A QHY8 or any other astro camera with the Sony ICX-453 sensor has such a low dark current that dark frames are completely unnecessary even when taking 20 to 30 minute frames.. Lets see you get noise free 30 minute subs from ANY DSLR, even the most expensive DSLR's like the Canon 1D mk III / 1D mk IV and the Nikon D3Xs / D700...
Maybe the Sony based CCDs don't need dark frames for the current. You still need them for any hot pixels. My QHY8 has some.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-02-2010, 06:51 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Tunnel Vision

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,801
A bad pixel map solves it, or a single dark frame will show up any hot cold pixels...

I ran a QHY8 for about 8 months and NEVER used a dark frame.. Not once.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-02-2010, 07:06 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by mithrandir View Post
Maybe the Sony based CCDs don't need dark frames for the current. You still need them for any hot pixels. My QHY8 has some.
You may find that a bias frame is enough to remove the hot pixels
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-02-2010, 07:12 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by toryglen-boy View Post
Dont forget 16bt colour, as opposed to 12bt from DSLR (maybe 14bt in better cameras?)

make such a difference.



16 Bit is not so much of an advantage. Most OSC cameras don't have the well depth to take advantage of it. Full well depths of OSC cameras are typically around 25000 e's, and your signal is typically much less, so a lot of the AD converter range is wasted. 14 bit of the more expensive DSLR's is probably enough.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement