Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-09-2019, 10:24 AM
Jasp05 (Aaron)
Registered User

Jasp05 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Rockhampton
Posts: 220
Light Pollution Filter or Ha Filter?

Hi guys,

I'm looking into whether I should I just get a light pollution filter to help with my imaging from the backyard or whether a Ha filter would be better.

My skies are somewhere around a bortle 4-5 here in my town I think. (It's an orange zone on Dark site finder.com) But I can spot M8 with the naked eye most nights if the moon isn't around.

I have a car dealership across the street that uses strictly white lighting so I do have an excessive amount of "white" light versus a normal street with the usual Sodium vapor bulbs. I am shielded by the light as my house sits between the observatory and the lights, but I still imagine this impacts my imaging substantially.


I image with a modified Canon 550D. (one internal filter removed. not replaced with Baader glass or anything).

I am considering the Ha Filter over a light pollution filter as this will allow me to image during the times the moon is up. However I have read that these are not great to use on one shot colour cameras due to the RGGB Bayer matrix. (Only registers 1/4 of the signal of a mono camera with the same filter. so I have to increase exposure time a huge amount, or just deal with terrible signal to noise ratio in Ha subs). I generally image widefield so increasing the sub lengths to 10-15min is probably doable, but I know my DSLR will hate that from a temp point of view).

My current imaging setup is in my signature.

I would like your opinions on which would provide what benefits and why one would be more useful than the other?

If you have any preference towards brand, type - clip in/ screw in etc. I'm all ears.

Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-09-2019, 10:33 AM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,346
If you purchase the optolong L-Enhance filter you are effectively doing both. Google it for the reviews and there are some great youtube reviews as well, otherwise I also use the Optolong Lpro filter a great help as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-11-2019, 01:26 PM
crs (Colin)
Colin Melbourne

crs is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7
Filters

I had a 'moon and sky glow' filter that i heard was supposed to cut down the light pollution but it was not very good. I ended up with Ha (and OIII, SII) and it seems to do the trick. They are ZWO so not sure how they stack up against others.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-11-2019, 08:04 AM
RyanJones
Registered User

RyanJones is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Posts: 828
I use the other version of the same thing as Nik. Mine is an STC Duo Filter. I image in bortle 8 skies but I think even calling it an 8 is generous. I use it on an astromodified Canon 350d. I can image happily up to about 70% moon and up to 5 min subs where I start getting amp glow anyway, well before LP wash out.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
EQ8-R
Advertisement
Astromechanics
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Celestron RASA
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
Star Adventurer
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement