Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-01-2018, 09:43 AM
AstroApprentice (Jason)
Registered User

AstroApprentice is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 349
Zeiss refractor with carbon tube?

I was hunting through APMs 'stock clearance due to moving' sale and came across this Zeiss monster for a mere 24000 Euro!
http://www.apm-telescopes.de/en/zeis...rbon-tube.html
If I'm to believe all the negatives I've read about refractors with carbon fibre tubes, why would APM place such impressive Zeiss fluorite triplet lenses in one?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-01-2018, 06:49 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Weight and possibly ease of manufacture (making CF tubes any size is quite simple).

CF is NOT something you want in a refractor - otherwise, the high-end likes of AP, Tak, TEC, CFF etc would be using them. Look how popular the Officina Stellare Vipers with CF tube were (NOT!).

Yuri Petrunin of TEC and several other manufacturers have explained very well before why CF is NOT prime for refractors.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-01-2018, 07:01 PM
bigjoe (JOSEPH)
Registered User

bigjoe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroApprentice View Post
I was hunting through APMs 'stock clearance due to moving' sale and came across this Zeiss monster for a mere 24000 Euro!
http://www.apm-telescopes.de/en/zeis...rbon-tube.html
If I'm to believe all the negatives I've read about refractors with carbon fibre tubes, why would APM place such impressive Zeiss fluorite triplet lenses in one?
The strehls 96.6 great but there exists better or similar , for much , much , much less money...
More to do with the coveted name, pride of ownership.. than anything else...Carbon fibre ..no way!
And its still only 6"! Makes the Tecs, Taks ,AP etc ..look like absolute giveaways.
bigjoe.

Last edited by bigjoe; 31-01-2018 at 07:04 PM. Reason: Adding
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-01-2018, 08:28 PM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,059
At 35kgs ... that's pretty heavy .... nice Scope tho'

Col...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-01-2018, 09:45 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
At that price you could have this http://www.apm-telescopes.de/en/tele...mn-12-f-4.html

or an AP 10" - and the mount - and have change left over.

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/5...ak-cass/page-2
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-01-2018, 10:13 PM
bigjoe (JOSEPH)
Registered User

bigjoe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wavytone View Post
At that price you could have this http://www.apm-telescopes.de/en/tele...mn-12-f-4.html

or an AP 10" - and the mount - and have change left over.

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/5...ak-cass/page-2
And either of these Wunder scopes by Roland or Matthias would leave the poor ol but great Zeiss 6 incher in the dust visually ..though to be fair AP is a different story , even though it is housed in Carbon fibre.. esp widefield.

I heard one older 10 inch by Roland ..no longer made, sold for $25000 US plus recently!

bigjoe.

Last edited by bigjoe; 31-01-2018 at 10:20 PM. Reason: Adding
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31-01-2018, 11:24 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
To be honest if I had the spare cash and the observatory to put it in, I'd take the 16" f/4 Mak-Newt... perfect focal length, small secondary, and it's F/4 !!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-02-2018, 01:55 AM
bigjoe (JOSEPH)
Registered User

bigjoe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wavytone View Post
To be honest if I had the spare cash and the observatory to put it in, I'd take the 16" f/4 Mak-Newt... perfect focal length, small secondary, and it's F/4 !!!
Make that 2 of us...though looking to get something BIG , under the next 4/5 years.
bigjoe.

Last edited by bigjoe; 01-02-2018 at 02:08 AM. Reason: Adding
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement