Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy Books and Media

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-01-2018, 10:58 PM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 52N 6E (EU)
Posts: 1,152
Equator shifted 30 degrees 12500 years ago ?

See this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpNI2FtCgtc

I don't believe that. When it were true, Cairo would be right on the equator (shown in video) and the same applies to New Caledonia. Australia would be just still completely in the southern hemisphere with the northern tip of Qld hitting the equator and Europe in the northern tropic zone and Antarctica not within the arctic circles at all.
However there are no signs of any ancient tropical climate in 10500 BC in Europe and no vegetation or larger mammals in Antarctica as well.

The video also talks about 'celestial pole shift', but that is indeed true, we call this precession. But that has no influence on the location of the terrestal poles or equator or climate.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-01-2018, 03:00 PM
tonybarry's Avatar
tonybarry (Tony)
Registered User

tonybarry is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Penrith, Sydney
Posts: 556
The main issue with the proposition is the absolutely enormous amount of energy required to alter the spin axis of the earth. The rotational inertia is immense and the necessary energy could not be applied to the globe easily.

The only forces we know that could do the job would be asteroid impacts, at Late Heavy Bombardment levels.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Heavy_Bombardment

Given that this would provide a comprehensive extinction of life on earth, I don't think it could have happened, and likely not since the Cambrian Era when life is first known to have existed here.

The current understandings of Planet Nine solar system mechanics indicate that it *may* be possible for large objects in highly inclined orbits to alter the plane of the Solar System with respect to the Sun's equator; but this is not confirmed, and in any case does not work to change the spin axis of the planets.

Regards,
Tony Barry
WSAAG

Last edited by tonybarry; 14-01-2018 at 03:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-01-2018, 06:56 PM
bigjoe (JOSEPH)
Registered User

bigjoe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonybarry View Post
The main issue with the proposition is the absolutely enormous amount of energy required to alter the spin axis of the earth. The rotational inertia is immense and the necessary energy could not be applied to the globe easily.

The only forces we know that could do the job would be asteroid impacts, at Late Heavy Bombardment levels.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Heavy_Bombardment

Given that this would provide a comprehensive extinction of life on earth, I don't think it could have happened, and likely not since the Cambrian Era when life is first known to have existed here.

The current understandings of Planet Nine solar system mechanics indicate that it *may* be possible for large objects in highly inclined orbits to alter the plane of the Solar System with respect to the Sun's equator; but this is not confirmed, and in any case does not work to change the spin axis of the planets.

Regards,
Tony Barry
WSAAG
Too True this Barry.
Earth at..
6x 10^24 KG, and Spinning so fast would indeed require incredible energy to change its orbit or equator, and be the end of any life.
bigjoe

Last edited by bigjoe; 14-01-2018 at 06:56 PM. Reason: Add
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement