Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Astrophotography and Imaging Equipment and Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-02-2011, 09:39 PM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
DSLR Sub length and ISO question on guided exposures

Hi All,

What settings should I use for subs when using my Canon 1000D (CMOS) DSLR?

I have been trying 5 mins @ ISO 400 (looks washed out), 60 secs @ IS0 800 and 1600 etc and I am not sure what works best.

I know the brightness of the target comes into the equation (and probably skyglow is my issue), but I am after some guidance on a happy medium to get me started now that I have my guiding working so that the image subs arent too grainy which makes me think they are wrong and I throw them away.

Or do I simply process them properly and the washed out look goes away when using flats/darks in the right way?

Any help here would be appreciated so I start on the right track. ie for Eta C, try 20 subs at 5 mins @ ISO 100 for example.....

Thanks

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-02-2011, 09:58 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Spectroscopy Wizard

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St Leonards, Vic
Posts: 6,949
ie for Eta C, try 20 subs at 5 mins @ ISO 100 for example

Yes
IMHO ISO200 will give you as good a result as anything else..the gain in the camera is kept under control and you can stretch in your imaging program.
The more subs the better the signal to noise; the longer the subs the better the build up of photons....so, more, longer subs.
Light pollution is probably the real limiting factor.
Just my 2c
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-02-2011, 10:06 PM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
Hi Merlin,

Was that a good guess or just a fluke?

So, as long as I can at lowish ISO - say 200 and then take HEAPS of them to build up the SNR. Good darks and flats and then get the encyclopaedia of Photoshop for the final mile.....

Thanks

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-02-2011, 11:17 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Chris, I can't add much more than what Merlin's said, longer and more is the rule of thumb.

I'm a 5 min ISO800 sort of person, but then that's just me. One thing to remember though is that long subs will tend to wash out any star colour, so its a balancing act.

Some will swear at ISO 400 and it obviously works for them. Others ISO200. In the end its a personal choice. The lower the ISO the longer the exposure to get the same or similar result with high ISO. The trade off is more noise at higher ISO and to a certain degree (just my experience) lower native colour intensity/richness.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2011, 12:42 AM
jones's Avatar
jones (Salvatore)
Registered User

jones is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 80
Hi,
I found that the best compromise between gain and noise, with my camera (unmodded Canon 450D) is at ISO400.
For the length, if you're under light polluted sky, then I guess the best you can do is expose as much as you can while keeping the peak of the histogram at around 75% of the window. Just make sure the right tail doesn't get cut by the right border (in that case you'd be losing information).

So expose as long as you can, as many times as you can. During summer I wouldn't do ISO800 as the noise would be really high.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2011, 01:03 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,158
ISO-400 worked the best for me, between 5 minutes and 10 minute exposures. That was with the 300D and the 350D.

When I got the 40D, I took a walk on the wild side just before I got rid of it and started shooting at ISO-800 with 10-minute exposures and was able to get this type of image with it: http://members.optusnet.com.au/mrozy..._NGC_4945.html

With the 5D Mark II, ISO-1600 was my default.

Dark skies help.

H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Meade Australia
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Australia
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Celestron Australia
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement