Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 2.67 average.
  #1  
Old 25-05-2017, 09:04 AM
Jasp05 (Aaron)
Registered User

Jasp05 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Rockhampton
Posts: 226
Sky adventurer or HEQ5 (Goto) - Beginner astrophotography with DSLR

Hi guys,

I've been dabbling in some widefield astrophotography for the last few months. Have built my own barn door tracker which has allowed some nice shots of the milkyway with my dslr.

However I'm looking to start using some longer FL lenses and see if I can get some images of fainter dso's.

Currently looking at a Sky adventurer mount, as I like the idea of it being so portable, and its reasonably priced for its performance from the reviews I've read.

However I do feel like astrophotography is something I will likely continue to do in the future and am wondering if purchasing a mount like a heq5 pro would be better. This would allow me to throw on a refractor or something down the track as I get more involved.

Can anyone provide some insight as to which option would be best or pro's and cons of both? Budget is in the $600-$800 range. (I believe a second hand HEQ5 would be in this price range?)


I currently own an 8 inch collapsible dob, which I plan to make an EQ platform for. Or as a third option would buying an EQ platform for my dob allow for better astro shots than any of the above options?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-05-2017, 10:00 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
I'd go for the HEQ5 myself for a couple of reasons.
1) It is future proofing a bit.
2) Has a higher capacity so it'll handle heavier lens' better.
3) Having larger gears it'll likely have better tracking performance.

I have been using a non-goto HEQ5 for years for visual and DSLR photography, works a treat.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-05-2017, 11:03 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
I second that.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-05-2017, 11:51 AM
Jasp05 (Aaron)
Registered User

Jasp05 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Rockhampton
Posts: 226
I've found a heQ5 pro mount with a saxon 200DS scope attached.

Its only a 30 min drive from where I'm located. He's asking $1300.

Is this a reasonable price?

Comes with a ProStar LP-Guide USB camera as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-05-2017, 10:46 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Not a bad price at all , if its in good condition mechanically and optically you cant really go wrong ( an all in one option ) with the LP-Guide as a bonus , and if you like it your 8 inch Dob would sell quickly to offset some of the cost ,,, of a small ED80 or something to compliment the 8 inch OTA thats with the HEQ5 ? . ( slippery slope to empty pocket's )

Just a thought ..

Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-05-2017, 10:50 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
As Brian says, if it's in reasonable condition then the price is pretty good.
The only ceveat to replacing your 8" dob with the 8" newt on the HEQ5 is that newtonian telescopes on an equatorial mount was designed by Satan himself
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-05-2017, 10:56 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
But you can foil satan ,,, a nice set of rotating tube rings ,
there are plenty of cheep really good options you can make on the net .

Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
As Brian says, if it's in reasonable condition then the price is pretty good.
The only ceveat to replacing your 8" dob with the 8" newt on the HEQ5 is that newtonian telescopes on an equatorial mount was designed by Satan himself
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-05-2017, 11:57 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian nordstrom View Post
But you can foil satan ,,, a nice set of rotating tube rings ,
there are plenty of cheep really good options you can make on the net .

Brian.
That's a good point!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-05-2017, 12:33 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
I made a D.I.Y. device that allowed me to turn the OTA at will,
for $5. It made it more convenient to use than a refractor, being able to put it in a comfortable viewing position no matter where it was aimed in the sky.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26-05-2017, 03:13 PM
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy (Tony)
Local Korean Millennial

that_guy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charleville
Posts: 2,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
I made a D.I.Y. device that allowed me to turn the OTA at will,
for $5. It made it more convenient to use than a refractor, being able to put it in a comfortable viewing position no matter where it was aimed in the sky.
raymo
you gonna leave us hanging or are you gonna let us know how you made it
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 26-05-2017, 06:07 PM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Yep , photos old mate .

Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
I made a D.I.Y. device that allowed me to turn the OTA at will,
for $5. It made it more convenient to use than a refractor, being able to put it in a comfortable viewing position no matter where it was aimed in the sky.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 26-05-2017, 06:29 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Hi Tony, The tube rings are threaded at top centre for attaching accessories, so put countersunk screws into both of them, and get two wing nuts or the black plastic knurled knobs used for tightening cameras onto said screws.
[The scope may have come with one of the black knobs for the supplied
screw which is used for mounting a camera on top of the tube for widefield imaging].
get a piece of steel strip 25mm x 4mm x long enough to reach from about 10mm forward of the front tube ring screw to about 25mm beyond the
rear of the scope when it is set as far back in the rings as you are ever likely to need to put it for balancing purposes.
drill a hole in the centre of the strip, large enough for the screw to slide
easily into, about 8mm from the front end of the strip. place the hole onto the front screw and mark the position of the rear screw. Drill the hole for the rear screw, and then elongate both holes about 50mm, so the strip can slide back and forth by that amount.
Bend the rear end 90degrees about 20-25mm from the end.
Attach a square of Teflon to the inside face of the turned in end, which
will prevent the rotating of the tube from damaging the scope's paintwork.
Balance the scope approximately, and fit the strip with the turned in end touching the rear face of the scope; tighten the two wing nuts/ knobs and then slacken off the tube rings enough to allow you to rotate the scope
so that the focuser is where you want it. Once the scope is resting against
the turned in end of the strip you can leave the rings slightly slackened
so that you can rotate the tube any time you like; if imaging, nip up the ring securing knobs, but if using visually they can remain slightly slackened. This might sound a bit fiddly, but I made it in 45 minutes.
You can of course improve its appearance by painting it the appropriate
colour for your scope.
Hope this helps
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 26-05-2017, 06:33 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Sorry Brian, no pics, all my gear has been sold off; all I have left is a pair of nokkies. Hopefully, my description will be sufficient. If not I will do a simple
sketch. Actually, I might have a pic of the rig somewhere, I'll have a look.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 26-05-2017, 11:24 PM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Yep , photos old mate .

Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
I made a D.I.Y. device that allowed me to turn the OTA at will,
for $5. It made it more convenient to use than a refractor, being able to put it in a comfortable viewing position no matter where it was aimed in the sky.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-05-2017, 02:07 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
I have a photo that shows the device well, but unfortunately it is a large
file, and I no longer have a downsizing programme on my comp, and it
is refusing to download anything. I have posted a photo which was taken
at a different angle so that the device is only seen side on. The piece of flat bar is bent over 90 degrees at the rear of the scope with a piece of teflon stuck to the inside of the bend so the scope turns easily, and the paint doesn't get damaged. Worked fine for me for over four years. You can get a slightly
better idea of it if you magnify your screen until just before the photo starts to pixellate
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_4714-down.jpg)
197.4 KB51 views
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-05-2017, 09:49 AM
Jasp05 (Aaron)
Registered User

Jasp05 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Rockhampton
Posts: 226
Got a few more questions regarding the viability of the Sky adventurer mount.

At this stage from what I've seen, the HEQ5 mount is a bit out of budget right now.

What kind of Focal lengths would I need to capture some decent details in some of the brighter nebulae's (Lagoon, triffid, M42, Eagle etc).

I've currently got a 200mm lens on an APS-C Sensor (So effectively 300mm approx).

How big a lens (or FL) can the sky adventurer handle whilst maintaining tracking accuracy?

And is the autoguide feature on the sky adventurer actually worthwhile using given it has no tracking in declination? (It only adjusts in RA).

If i could get 3-5 min subs using guiding with a 200mm lens I think that would allow me to image many objects to keep me occupied for a long while.

But I want to be sure that this is a reasonable expectation of the sky adventurer mount. (I've read some people can do 1-2min at 200mm (unguided I believe) while others are getting 4min subs with perfectly acceptable results. see below.

http://www.opticalvision.co.uk/user/..._review_hq.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29-05-2017, 10:29 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
I know nothing about the Sky Adventurer, but the fact that it only tracks
in R.A. is irrelevant, as full size equatorial mounts [such as the HEQ5] also only track in R.A. which
is why polar alignment has to be spot on.
raymo

Last edited by raymo; 29-05-2017 at 10:30 AM. Reason: correction
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29-05-2017, 01:23 PM
cadman342001 (Andy)
Registered User

cadman342001 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasp05 View Post
Got a few more questions regarding the viability of the Sky adventurer mount.

At this stage from what I've seen, the HEQ5 mount is a bit out of budget right now.

What kind of Focal lengths would I need to capture some decent details in some of the brighter nebulae's (Lagoon, triffid, M42, Eagle etc).

I've currently got a 200mm lens on an APS-C Sensor (So effectively 300mm approx).

How big a lens (or FL) can the sky adventurer handle whilst maintaining tracking accuracy?

And is the autoguide feature on the sky adventurer actually worthwhile using given it has no tracking in declination? (It only adjusts in RA).

If i could get 3-5 min subs using guiding with a 200mm lens I think that would allow me to image many objects to keep me occupied for a long while.

But I want to be sure that this is a reasonable expectation of the sky adventurer mount. (I've read some people can do 1-2min at 200mm (unguided I believe) while others are getting 4min subs with perfectly acceptable results. see below.

http://www.opticalvision.co.uk/user/..._review_hq.pdf
Hey mate,

I am/was in the same boat, couldn't afford a proper EQ mount, also I'm flying down from Cairns to Surfer's for a month to visit my daughter so portability was a consideration too.

I've just started using my Star Adventurer, with a Nikon D600 so full frame and a 200mm I'm getting 2 min subs and I'm using a QHYCCD Polemaster for polar alignment.

I have been trying to use longer FL of 360mm (180mm + 2X TC) but was only getting 1 minute subs with that and wasn't picking up the nebulosity - not sure though if this was because the exposures weren't long enough or because of light pollution or more likely both.

I was using that lens with the camera on a ball head on the L-bracket with counterweight but am now not using the BH as was advised that it makes tracking less accurate.

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29-05-2017, 01:31 PM
DarkKnight (Kev)
Registered User

DarkKnight is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Morpeth NSW
Posts: 177
I've been through/going through this exercise and will give another for the HEQ5 Pro for it's weight handling and future proofing.

I've seen some pretty impressive results with DSLR's and lens in the 400mm mark.

Keep an eye on the forum classifieds as there are a couple of HEQ5 Pro's in there at present.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 29-05-2017, 03:24 PM
Jasp05 (Aaron)
Registered User

Jasp05 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Rockhampton
Posts: 226
I'm interested to know how you went with doing longer subs at 200mm though Andy.

or are you finding that 2 min subs are long enough?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement