Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-01-2012, 08:06 PM
von Tom's Avatar
von Tom (Tom)
Registered User

von Tom is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,405
Perihelion today

The Earth was at perihelion today. I managed just 2 cloud free images. Here is one side by side with a shot at Aphelion 6 months ago at the same focal length (1500mm).

Tom
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_5656 perihelion aphelion copy.psdss.jpga.jpg200kb.jpg)
166.6 KB126 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2012, 09:10 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,706
Nice work Tom – I love these very visual representations that so vividly reveal the often hidden dynamics of our solar system. 10 out of 10 for finding the cloud free holes!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2012, 09:37 PM
Derek Klepp's Avatar
Derek Klepp
Registered User

Derek Klepp is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NE NSW
Posts: 2,401
Thanks Tom
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2012, 05:50 AM
astronobob's Avatar
astronobob (Bob)
Casual Cosmos Capturer

astronobob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gold Coast SE QLD
Posts: 4,190
Nice work Tom, can note the size difference re 5 mill odd Ks closer with the 2nd ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2012, 01:53 PM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 817
Very nice!

I pasted your image into a graphics application and measured the apparent diameters North-South and East-West.

The size difference (in both orientations) between Aphelion and Perihelion images is almost exactly 1 percent.

This corresponds very well with the actual difference in earth-Sun distance - 1 percent!

Dean
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-2012, 02:52 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
Excellent montage - very cool post.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-01-2012, 07:08 PM
John Hothersall's Avatar
John Hothersall
Registered User

John Hothersall is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thornlands, Brisbane.
Posts: 1,346
Thats a great project for a forgotten fact about Earth's orbit, difference is obvious.

John.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-01-2012, 09:35 PM
Clayton's Avatar
Clayton
Rob

Clayton is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,201
Nice one Tom
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-01-2012, 09:36 PM
von Tom's Avatar
von Tom (Tom)
Registered User

von Tom is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,405
Thanks for the comments everyone. Dennis I was determined to get the perihelion Sun that day those clouds weren't going to stop me!

Dean I tried the measurement myself (about) 576 pixels/596 pixels = 96.6%
147.1 million km/ 152.1 Million km = 96.7%

I didn't really know how the comparison would look when I took the second pic and I'm glad it seems to be consistent! I had fun trying to work out how best to display it too.

Cheers,

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-01-2012, 09:50 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,716
I really enjoyed seeing this Tom - this sort of work really broadens our minds to the realities of our orbit. Amazing just how small the apparent change is. Thanks for sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-01-2012, 12:25 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,944
An excellent representation. I did something similar with the moon years ago; all on slide film. You might like to try that one next.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-01-2012, 12:30 PM
von Tom's Avatar
von Tom (Tom)
Registered User

von Tom is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,405
Thanks Paul - I got full Moon images at apogee and perigee from last year and I'm working on it

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-01-2012, 01:41 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,620
Well done. Nice to see basic science and arithmetic evolving from these images
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-01-2012, 06:54 PM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 817
Tom: our percentage figures appear to differ, but actually don't (mathematically): it just depends on whether the larger number is divided by the smaller, or vice versa...!

Dean
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-01-2012, 08:45 PM
von Tom's Avatar
von Tom (Tom)
Registered User

von Tom is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,405
Hi Dean, I understand. There's many ways to measure and calculate. I'm just glad my images are consistent with what's expected
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement