Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-10-2018, 02:21 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,866
World wide dragonfly.

I expect all know about the dragonfly project.
I am particularly fond of the idea because I had it a long time ago and someone did it proving my idea was not entirely ratbag.

Well I was thinking today what with stacking and all why could we not form a group of folk around the world all using the same gear and stack a couple of thousand multi hour contributions into one image.
Now I know it will work but no doubt members here will be able to ppint out why it wont so in anticipation I call for a committee to be formed to solve all problems ptesented

Could we do it.
Say a group with 100 mm espirts and zwo 1600 cams...or the like.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2018, 02:24 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,866
If you look at the big scopes they are now made up of many segments...one with near 800 individual mirrors...

Would separation by half a world give any advantage?
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2018, 04:41 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
Stacking multiple images together would work as long as they’re of a minimum standard otherwise the poor quality ones will muddy the pool

As for long base line imaging, this is routinely done in radio astronomy but sadly it doesn’t work in optical. The large professional telescopes with hundreds of segments work because they’re all pointing towards the same secondary mirror and hitting the same CCD. So for optical astronomy it doesn’t matter if the telescopes are across the globe or across the street.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2018, 07:32 PM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
Would separation by half a world give any advantage?
Continuous collection of data would be one advantage- it's always night somewhere.

Best
JA
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2018, 08:49 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Conceptually it would be possible to image the entire night sky, every night, using an army of robotic internetted smallish scopes. I'd make them solar powered, with a panel to charge and a battery for storage, and a wireless data connection to whatever carrier is available. Programmed to take a bunch of images suitable for stacking around local midnight and dump the images onto a server in the cloud.

Assemble enough of these scopes to provide full coverage of the sphere formed by the night sky, allowing for some overlap. This is a compromise in therms of focal length and sensor size vs the number of scopes, but definitely within the realm of doable. If each camera covers 4 square degrees it would require tad over 10,000 scopes. Programming each scope to take images of say ten portions of the sky instead of 1 per night reduces the number of scopes required by a factor of 10, say 1,000. For each chunk of sky to be imaged, lets say 10 shots at 30 seconds apiece, so each camera would take 100 shots each night, for an imaging run lasting about an hour.

Now the locations. Assuming we could install them at any point on the globe, have every scope imaging at their local zenith. That way the entire dark side sky would be covered once, every night.

However there is an issue with inaccessible or insecure locations (oceans, the poles, Himalayas and deserts etc) and locations that are hopelessly cloudy. For the cameras that would have been located in these, merely relocate them to a more suitable location where there is internet access - but still have them aimed at their designated patch of sky by hour angle and declination.

Once deployed, at the server side, stack the images from each camera for each night. The result is an image of the entire night sky, every night. With 1000 cameras producing 100 frames per night, that's 100,000 images per night requiring a potentially a few terabytes of storage per day. A petabyte per year. And the backend has to munch through this lot faster and dump the old frames than the images come in - or it will be inundated.

Now... as for what to do with that data... deploy a web application in the cloud (utilise the massive computing power in the cloud) which takes each group of 10 frames, stacks them to produce the final image for each chunk of sky and compares the images night to night for changes, eg supernovae, asteroids on collision courses with Earth, alien spacecraft... whatever.

Sounds like a plan - anyone with a server farm lying idle, and friends in high places in Google, or AWS ?

Last edited by Wavytone; 10-10-2018 at 09:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-10-2018, 09:30 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,064
Nice one Nick.

I seem to recall someone on Astrobin doing like this - because my data was included in one of the images. Used many sources to create an image. Wish I could remember the details now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2018, 05:19 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazjen View Post
Nice one Nick.

I seem to recall someone on Astrobin doing like this - because my data was included in one of the images. Used many sources to create an image. Wish I could remember the details now.
https://www.astrobin.com/119854/?nc=user
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-10-2018, 06:46 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazjen View Post
Nice one Nick.

I seem to recall someone on Astrobin doing like this - because my data was included in one of the images. Used many sources to create an image. Wish I could remember the details now.
As well as the pic that Colin posted there is a thread by Morten on the PI forum about his Crowd Sourced images:

https://pixinsight.com/forum/index.php?topic=7506.0
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-10-2018, 10:59 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,866
Thanks to all for your contributions here.

Well I am happy that the idea was reasonable and better still it is being done.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-10-2018, 11:04 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
As well as the pic that Colin posted there is a thread by Morten on the PI forum about his Crowd Sourced images:

https://pixinsight.com/forum/index.php?topic=7506.0
I like that idea.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-10-2018, 12:24 PM
CalvinKlein's Avatar
CalvinKlein (Kelvin)
Registered User

CalvinKlein is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Cudgen NSW
Posts: 171
I'm fascinated by this concept Alex. I love the idea of the Dragonfly arrays. Combining data from multiple sources makes a lot of sense !

I'm slowly working on my own triple-imaging system using a 127mm triplet refractor & 0.7x reducer with Canon 6D and a couple of F2.8 EOS lenses with cooled ASI cameras. All three have similar field of view. I regularly use the two ASI cameras & DSLR lenses together - one for mono (luminance and Ha) and the other for the Colour. Works well.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Triplet.jpg)
189.8 KB35 views
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-10-2018, 01:57 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,866
Wonderful set up there Kelvin.
Thank you for posting.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-10-2018, 07:48 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalvinKlein View Post
I'm fascinated by this concept Alex. I love the idea of the Dragonfly arrays. Combining data from multiple sources makes a lot of sense !

I'm slowly working on my own triple-imaging system using a 127mm triplet refractor & 0.7x reducer with Canon 6D and a couple of F2.8 EOS lenses with cooled ASI cameras. All three have similar field of view. I regularly use the two ASI cameras & DSLR lenses together - one for mono (luminance and Ha) and the other for the Colour. Works well.
Hi Kelvin,

I'm trying to do something similar with Nikon lenses and ASI1600mm and ASI294MC cameras. At present I'm tweaking the spacing trying to improve the stars in the corners. The recent weather in Brisbane hasn't helped...

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-10-2018, 11:23 AM
CalvinKlein's Avatar
CalvinKlein (Kelvin)
Registered User

CalvinKlein is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Cudgen NSW
Posts: 171
I'd be keen to see your setup Rick. It's still early stages for me with all this but AstroPixelProcessor has made combining the different images a breeze.

Here's the setup with my Samyang 135mm / ASI1600 and Tamron 70-200 F2.8 @85mm / ASI183. (both similar FoV).

From what I've read dark skies are a necessity for the ASI183MC-Pro. The ASI1600MM-Pro on the other hand is happy imaging anywhere and under any conditions :-)

My goal for all of this is to get as much imaging information for multiple targets in the shortest possible time on the rare occasions I can get out to a true dark site.

This bad run of weather has pretty well killed my chances of getting the North America / Pelican nebula for the year - I might get one more crack next month if I can find a high location with zero light pollution to the north.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (DOHC Cabled 1 & 2.jpg)
215.3 KB21 views
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 15-10-2018, 09:12 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Hi Kelvin,

I don't have a side-by-side set up yet. I'm just testing the individual components one at a time on a Star Adventurer. I have an Astro-Physics AP900 that I'll use for the dual system.

Cameras are an ASI1600mm and ASI294mc which I'll be using with camera lenses (lots of them... Samyang 135mm f/2, Nikon 85mm f/1.4, Nikon 50mm f/1.2, Zeiss 21mm, 35mm and 100mm, etc.) and a Borg 55FL f/3.6 scope that should ship from the US shortly. At present I'm just trying to sort out spacing and tilt so that I can get decent looking stars in the corners.

I hope to do a lot of narrowband from home with the ASI1600mm and then, like you suggest, suck down photons as quickly as possible with both systems on the rare occasion that I get out to a dark site.

Cheers,
Rick.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_1031.jpg)
182.1 KB15 views
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-10-2018, 08:12 AM
CalvinKlein's Avatar
CalvinKlein (Kelvin)
Registered User

CalvinKlein is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Cudgen NSW
Posts: 171
Very nice setup with your SA Rick. I pushed mine well beyond its recommended limits before buying my EQ6-R and am keen to get back to using it again alongside my heavy mount. I was regularly able to get 5min exposures at 500mm.

I've had intermittent issues with tilt I suspect due to the ZWO EOS adapters - even with mounting the lenses to take the weight off the adapter. I couldnt justify the cost of a Geoptik locking device so I got a similar device off an Aussie eBay site that I expect will arrive today. I dont think it will be able to replace the thinner EOS-T2 EFW though as its a couple of mm too thick. Its the normal ZWO EOS-T2 I've had most trouble with anyway.

That Borg looks like an amazing weapon !!

I looked at most of the short, fast OTAs around the 350mm FL mark - most had some quirk that users were unhappy with. Others were just plain difficult to order into the country. I ended up buying a second hand Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 sports lens for similar money. It rates extremely well for sharpness out to the corners even wide open, at almost all focal lengths. I was taking a big punt as I couldnt find anyone else using one for Astro. So far I'm very impressed - and of course it makes a good wildlife / sports zoom lens during the day :-)
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Rig 1.jpg)
185.4 KB13 views
Click for full-size image (EOS T2 Locking.png)
91.7 KB11 views
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-10-2018, 09:33 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
That's a heavily loaded SA, Kelvin, and the Sigma lens looks suitably impressive.

I have one of the Geoptik adapters for Nikon but, unfortunately, it was about 1mm too thick to work with the ASI1600mm and EFW. Starizona have an adapter that looks to be good quality but it is expensive and also doesn't have enough back focus for the mono camera and filter wheel. Let me know what you think of the Geoptik look alike when it arrives.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-10-2018, 11:59 AM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,064
Rick, if your filter wheel was the ZWO one, you might be able to switch to a Xagyl FW instead - from memory it's 1 or 2 mm thinner than the ZWO version.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-10-2018, 12:49 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazjen View Post
Rick, if your filter wheel was the ZWO one, you might be able to switch to a Xagyl FW instead - from memory it's 1 or 2 mm thinner than the ZWO version.
Hi Chris,

Yes, the specs say the Xagyl filter wheels take 1mm less when used with their adapters. I have a workable solution with the ZWO EFW/Nikon adapter and some thin spacers but worth keeping in mind as a future option.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 20-10-2018, 04:11 PM
CalvinKlein's Avatar
CalvinKlein (Kelvin)
Registered User

CalvinKlein is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Cudgen NSW
Posts: 171
Hi Rick

Well I can report that the eBay Geoptik work-alike is excellent.
I managed to find a 7.5mm T2 extender (Baader - courtesy of Astro Anarchy).

So I now theoretically have a strong & squarely coupled and perfectly spaced solution to the Samyang 135mm-ZWO camera tilt, mounting and spacing problems.

It seems to be such an elegant solution to everything else I (and others) have tried.

So we have 19mm for the EOS-T2 adapter, 7.5mm for the Baader extender, 11mm for the ZWO extension ring, and 6.5mm to the sensor = 44mm total. I sure hope I have my maths and flange-focal-distance theory correct !

Hopefully tonight or tomorrow morning after 5 weeks of cloud I will get to try it out.

cheers Kelvin
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ASI183 & Samyang135mm.jpg)
194.1 KB8 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement