Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate of skies
OK, So with alt/azimuth mounts, the stars would be trailing on the edge of the lens as the field of view doesnt turn to compensate for the rotating earth.. So this means the field of view must rotate perpindicular to the axis of the starlight. This would happen on a German eq mount, and also on a eq platform, (to the extent of the size of the sector arc that was cut).
Is this right ? What does the rate of rotation of the field of view need to be ?
|
Right. And wrong
The field rotation rate for dob is variable (depends on direction where dob is pointing) but Bartel's software supports field rotator.
BTW, if you add wedge (~37° for Melbourne, ~30 for Brisbane?) under the dob mount, it will be the same as equatorial.. and you will not need field rotator.
But the whole thing will be very unstable.. dobs are designed for vertical loads only.
The better way then may be the equatorial platform. Only the tracking time is limited with this approach.
Equatorial mount does not need field rotator as there is no such effect, telescope trails correctly.
Actually, dob is simpler and cheaper to build, and is better for visual.
And for GoTo, you have to drive both motors (both axis) anyway.. so..
But for photography, I think equatorial is better in terms of results (accurate tracking etc)..