#1  
Old 28-06-2008, 06:44 PM
darrellx's Avatar
darrellx (Darrell)
Registered User

darrellx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kulgun, Queensland
Posts: 278
Focusing with a filterwheel

Guys
Sometime ago, I asked a few questions about imaging with a DMK21 and getting it into focus with a filterwheel, etc. Well, I purchased the filter wheel and I thought I would share some stats with you. Maybe someone will find it interesting. Then I will have some questions.

I have an 8 inch Skywatcher, with a Crayford focuser
There is a total of 40mm draw on the focuser

Now with the DMK at prime focus I have 10mm of inward travel remaining on the focuser.
with a 2x barlow - 19mm of inward travel remaining
with 3x barlow - 34mm of inward travel remaining
with 5x powermate - 35mm of inward travel remaining

When I include the filterwheel (the Orion advertised as requiring an additional 20mm of focus travel), things don't work out as expected.
With the 2x barlow, I move the focuser in by only 6mm, leaving 13mm of inward travel
With the 3x barlow, I don't need to move it much at all - in by about 1 or 2 mm.
I would have thought that in each case I would have had to move the focuser in by 20mm at least. I don't understand.

The equipment was configured as
telescope; barlow; filterwheel; dmk

Darrell
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-06-2008, 07:51 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,789
You are changing the distance between the focal plane and the barlow. This will change the amount of magnification slightly and the focus position. If you used:
scope--- filter wheel-- barlow--camera
then the distances would add up as you expected.

Last edited by Terry B; 28-06-2008 at 07:51 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-06-2008, 08:44 AM
darrellx's Avatar
darrellx (Darrell)
Registered User

darrellx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kulgun, Queensland
Posts: 278
The distance from the focal plane to the barlow?? I thought the critical measurement was from the focal plane to the "last item in the line" - the camera in this case.

So is the distance from the focal plane to the barlow the important measurement because it is simply a barlow in there (and therefore I should always pay more attention to where the barlow is), or is it because it is the first "lensed" item (if thats the right word) in the line?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-06-2008, 10:46 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,345
Terry is correct. The issue is the distance from the Barlow to the chip in your case, and more so with the 5x Powermate which for some reason you didn't report back on?
Try this link http://www.televue.com/engine/page.asp?ID=42#MagChart
It shows the 5x Powermate increasing it's power with the greater distance Powermate to Chip. The 2.5x Powermate actually decreases slightly.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-07-2008, 07:46 PM
darrellx's Avatar
darrellx (Darrell)
Registered User

darrellx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kulgun, Queensland
Posts: 278
Well, I actually ran out of time. I fogged up before I got to try the PowerMate, and the viewing was quite poor. I have since tried the 5x and the movement required to bring it into focus when I add the filterwheel is very small - like 1 mm.

I have tried changing the configuration to scope-filterwheel-barlow-camera and you are right; I cannot get the smaller magnification barlows to focus.

Darrell
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement