#1  
Old 13-05-2018, 08:08 PM
kosborn's Avatar
kosborn (Kevin)
Registered User

kosborn is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Canberra
Posts: 495
PHD2 help

Tonight I managed a really good polar alignment but this is what my guiding graph looks like. It seems to plod along nicely but I get those big DEC spikes on both sides of the baseline. My total RMS error ranges from about 0.6" when good to over 1.1" when not. It is windy tonight - not sure if that has anything to do with it...?

Kevin
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (screenshot.png)
102.6 KB49 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-05-2018, 09:37 AM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Kevin
Those big spikes line up with a guide direction change, so are probably just PHD2 applying your designated backlash correction.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-05-2018, 03:23 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Hi Kevin,
Don't get too hang up on the RMS error, what you have is more than acceptable with your scope and camera setup in your signature.
So long as the stars are round, there's no need to lose sleep on the RMS error.
I regularly get 1-1.3" error and it doesn't affect the quality of images if I keep under 5 mins subs (which I do due to the LP and the sensitivity of the camera).
cheers
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-05-2018, 05:55 PM
kosborn's Avatar
kosborn (Kevin)
Registered User

kosborn is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Canberra
Posts: 495
Thanks for that. At 5 minute exposures I'm happy with the guiding. I tried 10 minute exposures a while ago (and would like to try again) but that didn't go well. I know there's lets of opinion about best exposure length vs gain and read noise but I still haven't got my head around that yet. In my simplistic way it seems to me that a longer exposure should get more detail in the faint areas - as long as bright areas aren't saturated and I've certainly seen some great shots from others with subs with very long exposures.

Kevin
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-05-2018, 06:37 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,888
Back in the past we seemed to go for one long exposure...manually guided so it was as much a test of endurance I guess.
I cant wait to get some long exposures in the bush with this nikon..remember my last camera was a 450 d canon ...and it worked great with long exposure so this one should be heaps better.
But I still cant get over what 30 shots get..for me two minuntes will be long exposure now...the longest I manually guided was fir one hour twenty minutes...and if not crazy to do it you were crazy after that time lini g up the cross hairs.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-05-2018, 08:35 PM
kosborn's Avatar
kosborn (Kevin)
Registered User

kosborn is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Canberra
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
Back in the past we seemed to go for one long exposure...manually guided so it was as much a test of endurance I guess.
...[snip]...
the longest I manually guided was fir one hour twenty minutes...and if not crazy to do it you were crazy after that time lini g up the cross hairs.
Alex
I'm seriously impressed! Great stamina to manually guide for over an hour!

Kevin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement