Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-08-2014, 08:35 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Sharp talons

Ok. I'm embarrassed.

Being a long time SBIG user, you'd think I'd know in which direction to attach an adaptive optics unit.

Until about 3 nights ago... err...well...no.

I was puzzling over why there seemed to be focal-plane tilt in my system....then it dawned on me I'd put the AO on 180 degrees out.

Now everything is orthogonal and wonderful

...and by the way...here is a link to probably the best H-alpha Image I've ever taken of M16.

(I hate rip-offs so....the image is watermarked.... )

Last edited by Peter Ward; 02-08-2014 at 11:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2014, 08:43 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,064
that is just jaw dropping, most excellent.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2014, 09:05 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
that is just jaw dropping, most excellent.
Much appreciated Fred.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2014, 09:12 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,902
Wow, that is stunning.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2014, 09:40 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Superb, Peter!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2014, 10:15 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
I just got chills down my spine.

WOW!

H
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2014, 10:36 PM
Spookyer's Avatar
Spookyer (Brett)
Brett P

Spookyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Dayboro
Posts: 567
Fantastic detail Peter. Took me a while to realise what the purple areas were.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2014, 10:48 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Stunning detail. Just awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2014, 10:55 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidU View Post
Stunning detail. Just awesome.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spookyer View Post
Fantastic detail Peter. Took me a while to realise what the purple areas were.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
I just got chills down my spine.

WOW!

H
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larryp View Post
Superb, Peter!
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Wow, that is stunning.

Greg.
Thanks gentlemen.

The star sizes speak for themselves, particularly given the average seeing over the Sydney basin during the last couple of nights.

As you may have guessed, a work in progress....

The web link is at about 60% res....and yes the watermark is purple
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-08-2014, 02:04 AM
Joshua Bunn's Avatar
Joshua Bunn (Joshua)
Registered User

Joshua Bunn is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albany, Western Australia
Posts: 1,463
Wow Peter, Pinpoint tiny stars, contrast and depth.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-08-2014, 06:50 AM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
The sharpness of the pillars is outstanding, and the stars are tight and round across the field. I have to ask about the background smoothness. Is that a noise reduction filter applied? Seems to have that waxy, too smooth look? Not criticising, just curious. I can only compare the backgrounds to my modest equipment, with which I see much more noise and I guess as a result, accept a more noisy background. Higher end gear must be smoother (and I've noticed that recently on one of Bert's raw images recently), but don't know to what extent.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-08-2014, 09:41 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by troypiggo View Post
The sharpness of the pillars is outstanding, and the stars are tight and round across the field. I have to ask about the background smoothness. Is that a noise reduction filter applied? Seems to have that waxy, too smooth look? Not criticising, just curious. I can only compare the backgrounds to my modest equipment, with which I see much more noise and I guess as a result, accept a more noisy background. Higher end gear must be smoother (and I've noticed that recently on one of Bert's raw images recently), but don't know to what extent.
The background smoothness is probably due a number of factors, No diffraction spikes, superb optics (the Honders ( a 12" F3.8 scope ) is fully corrected for all 5 Seidel aberrations spherical, coma, astigmatism, field curvature and distortion), the camera being at -40C, a 3nm filter, plus had a good calibration data set.

Guiding was at a modest 5Hz....hence it's pretty much all signal, no noise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Bunn View Post
Wow Peter, Pinpoint tiny stars, contrast and depth.
Ta Josh
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-08-2014, 10:23 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Hi Peter,
that's very sharp.
I am always impressed with your Astro-Physics RHA 305mm F3.8 Honders Astrograph.
What is the FWHM?

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-08-2014, 11:11 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Peter,
that's very sharp.
I am always impressed with your Astro-Physics RHA 305mm F3.8 Honders Astrograph.
What is the FWHM?

cheers
Allan
Looks to be about 1.8" (CCD inspector images attached)

0.1 arc-sec tilt in the y-axis apparently....then again, no, probably just a calibration error.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (RHAfwhm.jpg)
86.5 KB15 views
Click for full-size image (RHAcurve.jpg)
66.7 KB14 views
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-08-2014, 11:19 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Hi Peter,
That's great for FWHM.

The best I ever got in Melbourne was 2.2 arc seconds but I'm not using adaptive optics.
That's a nice flat result.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-08-2014, 12:38 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Looks very good, Peter, but hard to tell how good at 60% res. How about a small crop at 100%?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-08-2014, 02:56 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
Wow! Uber cool. Best I've seen to date at that image scale.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-08-2014, 08:30 PM
Rod771's Avatar
Rod771 (Rod)
Turn the lights off!

Rod771 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Parklea NSW
Posts: 1,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spookyer View Post
Took me a while to realise what the purple areas were.
Me too.

Fantastic Image Peter, congratulations!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-08-2014, 08:38 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
The background smoothness is probably due a number of factors, No diffraction spikes, superb optics (the Honders ( a 12" F3.8 scope ) is fully corrected for all 5 Seidel aberrations spherical, coma, astigmatism, field curvature and distortion), the camera being at -40C, a 3nm filter, plus had a good calibration data set.

Guiding was at a modest 5Hz....hence it's pretty much all signal, no noise.
Thanks for the reply. That's amazingly smooth background for no noise reduction. Almost doesn't look right and you should throw some noise in there
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement