Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward
100 hours of exposure time? Holy Mole’ !! Must be something of a record. Slick data. Very smooth...
|
Cheers Peter. Over 50hrs doesn't make much of a difference really, but if Im not processing for a while I just keep collecting anyway. Data is smoother but extra depth, on this anyway, just gets messy and hard to deal with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01
The King of NB looooong exposures is back!
All hail the King
Another Top image Fred, it’s been way too long...
|
Thanks Andy
. I have other object data saved up, just need to get round to processing which for me takes a long time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35
Nice one Fred. Did this myself some years back but you've recorded far more detail than I ever did. Not surprising I suppose with 100 hours.
Cheers
Steve
|
Thanks Steve. Yours is Ha RGB, different and WAY less time, you have appature , a luxury I dont have
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimmoW
That's magical Fred! A real rose. So schmooth...
|
Thanks Simon