Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-04-2017, 07:32 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
PHD2 need help understanding results

Hi guys,

I did a drift align through PHD2..went well but took me about an hour as it was my first time ever.
I took some screen shots of the performance from 7pm tonight in Brisbane guiding with ASI 120mm through the Orion 50mm finderscope (autoguider)

My stars look pretty good but I have no idea if these figures are Good, Bad or terrible. I don't expect high performance from Skywatcher AZ-EQ6.
Imaging through Esprit 120 840mm

I tend to look at the RA OSC it does go up to over .30 sometimes.

What should I be looking for.?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Clipboard01.jpg)
121.8 KB82 views
Click for full-size image (Clipboard02.jpg)
153.8 KB68 views

Last edited by Striker; 14-04-2017 at 07:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-04-2017, 09:11 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,982
What you're getting looks pretty good, you should be happy with those.
What you want to look at is the guide graph which looks reasonably smooth although it is kinda difficult to tell from the scale you have it at (looks almost completely flat).

The other thing to look at is the RMS values on the left hand side. Your getting around 0.5-0.6" in RA which is around what I'd get on average (and what I imagine would be average for an EQ6).

In short, what you're getting is pretty good and is what you'll get on average when it's working well and seeing is also playing nice. There are times i'd managed to get an RMS closer to 0.4" but that only happened when there were brief moments of better than normal seeing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-04-2017, 06:01 AM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
What you're getting looks pretty good, you should be happy with those.
What you want to look at is the guide graph which looks reasonably smooth although it is kinda difficult to tell from the scale you have it at (looks almost completely flat).

The other thing to look at is the RMS values on the left hand side. Your getting around 0.5-0.6" in RA which is around what I'd get on average (and what I imagine would be average for an EQ6).

In short, what you're getting is pretty good and is what you'll get on average when it's working well and seeing is also playing nice. There are times i'd managed to get an RMS closer to 0.4" but that only happened when there were brief moments of better than normal seeing.
Ok thanks Colin...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-04-2017, 09:18 AM
kens (Ken)
Registered User

kens is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 314
You should always attach the guide log rather than screen shots for an in depth analysis. But at face value, I agree with Colin that it is pretty reasonable for an EQ6
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-04-2017, 11:40 AM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
Your target star is a bit bigger than I would use.
Otherwise pretty nice looking.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-04-2017, 05:51 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by kens View Post
You should always attach the guide log rather than screen shots for an in depth analysis. But at face value, I agree with Colin that it is pretty reasonable for an EQ6
Ok cheers Ken, will check that out, I am real new to PHD2..didnt know anything about logs..just getting back into this hobby after 12 year break...lots of things have changed....lol
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-04-2017, 10:58 PM
kens (Ken)
Registered User

kens is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 314
PHD2 normally saves its log files under Documents\PHD2
The folder is configured in the "brain"
You can view the log files with PHDLogViewer and PEMPROlogviewer
The log files contain a wealth of information about your setup and the full set of data from each session. Your screenshot only shows 150 seconds of data.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-04-2017, 11:02 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
The attached summary of notes on PHD may assist you.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Pleas for help with PHD.zip (222.7 KB, 35 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-04-2017, 11:43 AM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
The attached summary of notes on PHD may assist you.
Cheers Ken, that's a good read, have saved it to read in far more detail.

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement