#1  
Old 01-04-2017, 04:29 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Alpha Crux Lo-Res spectrum

The attached image shows Alp Crux (B0.5iv) spectrum obtained with a 207l/mm grating mounted on an ED80 using ATiK 314 camera.
The dispersion is 16.6A/pixel
A work in progress, but shows the more prominent lines.
(A B0v comparison from Miles database and the B0 planck curve for info.)
Processed using BASS Project 1.9.7
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (alpcrux190317.jpg)
70.3 KB96 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2017, 10:50 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,789
Very interesting Ken.
Going back to very low res.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2017, 12:16 PM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
very nice Ken .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2017, 12:36 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Beren,
You should be able to obtain similar, or better! results using your grating.
The dispersion of 16A/pixel is low, a target of 10A/pixel may be slightly better.
Give it a go.......
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2017, 01:21 PM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Have a bit of data to go through including Alpha crux from last week, be good to see what results I get. I used a mono ccd this time and I think from a brief process of Sirius the dispersion was 14A/pixel, I was using a 10" reflector ( not sure if this good with the spider vanes). Downloaded the bass project software too.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2017, 10:08 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Hi Ken,

Have been experimenting with different exposures for capturing spectra. I was worried that getting into non-linear region in pixel response I will be distorting spectra, but it seems that I perhaps should go for longer exposures still?

Attached is an un-calibrated spectra with two different exposures. I am still not being able to identify specific absorption lines...loving the challenge! :-)

Suavi
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Testing.jpg)
191.6 KB16 views
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2017, 11:00 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
I think I've got the calibration right. Can go and get some sleep now.. :-)
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Alpha Crux.jpg)
164.6 KB12 views
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2017, 12:53 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Suavi,
Yes, you could give it a lot more exposure without fear.
Yes, your calibration looks good.
I notice you haven't selected a binning zone (and background sky removal zones) - you should do this....Selection tab/Quick active and sub regions, use the mouse to select a strip across the spectral image.
I've made up a label set ....
Just unzip to the BASS Project folder and use the label icon (three from the top right) to load it.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Sample TypeB.zip (570 Bytes, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2017, 07:17 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Suavi,
What dispersion were you getting with your set-up?
Ken
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2017, 07:52 AM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Thank you Ken for your hints and help.

I will need experiment with adding your labels and properly orientating the spectrum and removing sky background.

Dispersion is about 4.5 A / pixel (need to work out the exact spacing to the grating).
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Alpha Crux with reference2.jpg)
101.5 KB16 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-04-2017, 07:57 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Suavi,
After calibration BASS will give you the dispersion - below the chart, right hand side...
You can then compare this dispersion with your spacing (and binning if used) to confirm.
I use TransSpec.
Attached Files
File Type: zip TransSpecV3.1.zip (21.2 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-04-2017, 10:32 AM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Thank you Ken.

BASS indicated dispersion of 0.8899 nm/pixel, or about 8.9 Angstrom/px.

A bit busy at the moment, but will certainly continue learning how to properly do low resolution spectroscopy with my telescope.

Suavi
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-04-2017, 12:02 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Suavi,
Understood!
The 8.9 A/pixel is a good starting point.
Onwards and Upwards.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement