View Single Post
  #7  
Old 09-02-2018, 11:24 PM
bigjoe (JOSEPH)
Registered User

bigjoe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wavytone View Post
While 170X is possible it’s rather more than 2x per mm which is really the practical upper limit for refractors and TBH 170x is hype.

I could push my 70mm to 300X with a 1.6mm eyepiece, but there’s no point.

Can’t beat the physics of diffraction.

FWIW APM have a large selection of small APOs available from 50mm up, and assorted focal ratios, some clearly aimed at imaging while others are dual visual/imaging, the difference being the backfocus and focusser travel. Another aspect for imagers concerns all-screwed adapter rings to connect a camera - far more precise and secure than a cheap slip-fit 2” adapter. Add to that availability of 2.5” or 3” focussers including tack & pinion types able to lift heavy loads securely.
Really high mags like that Wavy , truly are only useable when splitting bright and mostly equal Double Stars ; and rarely even on the Moon in excellent seeing... so much of it is hype indeed, and useable on only a handfull of nights per year for most of us.

Still it will be a handy little scope for many, many uses.

bigjoe
Reply With Quote