Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Looks better to me too, Peter.
I found CCDInspector can give highly variable results, e.g. a series of subs of the same star field with the same filter will show big variations in curvature and tilt. The PixInsight FWHMEccentricity script also shows that individual subs vary widely. Maybe really good seeing is needed to get consistent (and useful) results? In the absence of that then an eyeball probably does a better job.
Cheers,
Rick.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Great news Peter, who would'a thought   ...and yes ultimately it is the eye that counts in the end, not a piece of software that is known to produce misleading results 
Mike |
Cheers Rick and Mike. It's been a long time in the making - quite a relief the camera was not the issue.