Thread: Canon 6D Mk II
View Single Post
  #15  
Old 16-07-2017, 11:04 PM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 52N 6E (EU)
Posts: 1,152
Is it really true that the DR of the 6d2 is slightly less than the original ??

4K is not my thing: too large files, slow processing and I don't notice the difference, unless I sit 2 meters in front of a 2 meters wide UHD TV.

But it can be useful for cropping videos taken with a telephoto.

The tilt screen can be useful, but for AP I already use a (larger) remote screen with a USB connected Android device running DSLR controller.

Why does Canon not jump on the milf bandwagon, like the Sony A7 and A9 ?
Less moving parts, shorter flange distance and lighter and smaller body.

OK, Canon already has a mirrorless (EOS M) but they are not the best ones.

If I would buy a new camera, it would be a milf, e.g. the Sony A7R. With a Metabones adapter, it fits all Canon lenses with working AF and metering, and costs about the same.

So an EOS M Fullframe would be a better option for Canon to market.
Reply With Quote