Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz
That confirms that I was wrong, as guessed - will have a look at the data with PI, which corrects for background.
|
Ray, I will crop out the data you requested and put it on Dropbox. I'll send you the link privately. I really appreciate your willingness to take a look at this data and to help me figure it out!
Peter
PS: In your other post tonight your point is well taken about the "magnification" effect of the smaller pixels. Yes, one must compare apples to apples so to speak. Well, this is exactly what started me down this path: I take luminance at .88 arc-sec on the TEC180 with the G2-8300. The colour from the Trius on the TEC140 at .95 arc-sec. It is during the L-RGB combine (where the Trius image is scaled up to match the .88 arc-sec luminance) that I notice that many of the stars coming from the Trius are just larger than from the KAF8300 chip. Of course without a special filter blue was/is huge. But I notice it with other coloured stars as well.